ensuring valid test results cgcs annual meeting curriculum and research directors july 13 2012 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Session Outline PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Session Outline

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 10

Session Outline - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Ensuring Valid Test Results CGCS Annual Meeting Curriculum and Research Directors July 13, 2012. Session Outline. Milwaukee and Wisconsin background Strategies to prevent violations of test security / assessment protocols Actions taken when reported violations are verified

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Session Outline' - danno

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
session outline
Session Outline
  • Milwaukee and Wisconsin background
  • Strategies to prevent violations of test security / assessment protocols
  • Actions taken when reported violations are verified
  • Response to unverified allegations of violations
background state assessment program
Background: State Assessment Program
  • Annual state test, 3-8 & 10; window opens in the last week of October and remains open until just before Thanksgiving
  • Schools have until the week after Thanksgiving to pack up test boxes and return for scoring
  • Results returned to schools in February; to the district in March
  • State historically did not provide erasure analyses or conduct investigations for reported violations of test security
preventative strategies written documentation
Preventative Strategies—Written Documentation
  • Developed Assessment Ethics Policy
  • Developed Assessment Procedure Manual, which outlinesa. Rationale for standardized assessment protocolsb. Links to policies on assessment ethics and employee code of conductc. Specific do’s and don’ts with state testingd. Appropriate test prep activities
preventative strategies pd
Preventative Strategies -- PD
  • Require annual training of all staff involved in assessment, including those who proctor, distribute, or box up test booklets
  • Require face-to-face training conducted by district staff of all designated School Assessment Coordinators and all School Leaders; they are required to train their staff at the sites (can use video supports CS provides)
  • Require sign-off documentation annually
preventative strategies analyses
Preventative Strategies -- Analyses
  • Conduct internal analyses of available data using several years of data
    • Large gains analysis
    • Erasure analysis
    • Omission analysis
  • Analyses are exploratory, not confirmatory but serve to build awareness of issues
  • Schools with higher rates of irregularities were flagged and school leaders (and their supervisors) were notified
  • Analytic procedures will be updated this summerbased on information gleaned from KS conference
actions taken
Actions Taken
  • Various reports are received, mostly calls to the Department of Research/Assessment, by school staff, who question their own practicese.g. “I didn’t cover up the word list on the wall during testing; is that ok?” or “I found a grade 4 test booklet in the old filing cabinet of the retired guidance counselor. How do I return it to you?”
  • Confirmed student cheating results in an invalidated test following established protocols
actions taken1
Actions Taken
  • Staff reports of inappropriate practices by their colleagues result in 1. report of allegation to Wisconsin DPI2. internal investigation by Administrative Accountability3. report of results of internal investigation to DPI
  • Depending on results of investigation, various personnel actions are taken with affected staff
response to unverified allegations
Response to Unverified Allegations
  • Internal allegations that are unverified may result in closer scrutiny of testing situation in the following year
  • 2012 allegation of unusual test score gains was largely refuted by an unprecedented collaboration between the CGCS, the district (and other affected member districts), UW-Madison’s Value-Added Research Center, and the Department of Public Instruction
further information
Further Information
  • MPS Assessment website:Main MPS Home Page – Departments –Research & Evaluation – Assessment
  • Or contact:Deb Lindsey, DirectorResearch and Evaluation414-475-8751