1 / 26

Superpave Today

Superpave Today. Kenneth Ray Hobson, P.E. – Bituminous Engineer khobson@odot.org. City of Tulsa May 13, 2011. Overview. Asphalt Mix Design Methods Laboratory Mixture Compactors Asphalt Binders Aggregate Tests Mix Design Proof Testing Design by Traffic Volume. Overview.

danniej
Download Presentation

Superpave Today

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Superpave Today Kenneth Ray Hobson, P.E. – Bituminous Engineer khobson@odot.org City of Tulsa May 13, 2011

  2. Overview • Asphalt Mix Design Methods • Laboratory Mixture Compactors • Asphalt Binders • Aggregate Tests • Mix Design Proof Testing • Design by Traffic Volume

  3. Overview • Mix Design Notes • Future Items of Note • 2009 Std. Spec. 411 • Links Of Note

  4. Automatic Marshall Hammers

  5. Texas Gyratory Hveem Compactor

  6. Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC)

  7. Limitations of Traditional Binder Specifications • Penetration & ductility tests are purely empirical • Tests are conducted at one standard temp (i.e.. Pen @ 77ºF,Vis @ 140ºF), despite different climatic conditions • Entire range of pavement temperatures (esp. low temp’s) not considered

  8. Limitations of Traditional Binder Specifications • Asphalt cements can have different temperature and performance characteristics within same grade (Pen or Vis) • Not applicable to modified binders (more use in recent years) • E.g. Grades AC-20, PMAC-1C

  9. Superpave Asphalt Binder Specification The grading system is based on Climate PG 64 - 22 Min. pavement temperature Performance Grade Average 7-day max. pavement temperature

  10. Performance Graded Binder Specifications • Based on Mechanical Properties (DSR, BBR) • Modulus • Deflection • Load Response (Rate) • Other Tests Remain Unchanged • Mass Change, Flash Point, Elastic Recovery, etc. ER is known as PG+ Spec. • ODOT 2009 Std. Spec. 708.03 Table 708:2

  11. Aggregate Tests • Superpave similar to Hveemwith added tests: • Fine Aggregate Angularity (FAA) • Bulk Specific Gravity (used for FAA and VMA computations) • Micro-Deval (30+ MESALs)

  12. Mix Design Proof Testing • Marshall Cohesiometer • Hveem Stabilometer • Hamburg Rut Test

  13. Design by Traffic Volume • Hveem – ADT • Lab Specimens (4” diameter) Compacted the Same (275oF) • Air Void Limits Adjusted by Traffic • Superpave –ESALs in 20 Years • Lab Specimens (6” diameter) Compacted More with More Traffic (300oF) • Air Void Limits Kept Constant

  14. Mix Design Notes • Ndes – Number of SGC Gyrations at JMF Binder • Nini – Number of SGC Gyrations backcalculated from Ndes Specimens • Density Similar to That Behind Paver • Nmax – Number of SGC Gyrations at End of Pavement Life (mix design only)

  15. Future Items of Note • WMA – The Future is here now! • Provides Many Benefits • Tack Coats – 0.15 gal/SY Diluted 1:1 • Trackless Tack Emulsion – Near 100% Bonding • Pave Sprayer Applied PMCRS-1S – Near 100% Bonding

  16. 2009 Std. Spec. 411 • Table 411:2 – Calculate Density (RD) Based on Latest Gse at JMF Binder Content for Pay Factor • Table 411:4 – Binder Content (Pb) and Air Voids (AV) for Pay Factors • CPF = (4 x RD + (3 x AV) + (3 x Pb)) / 10

  17. Future Items of Note • Increased Binder Content by Special Provision • Possible Reduction in SGC Gyrations • Possible VMA Increase by 0.5%

  18. Links of Note • Construction Engineering • Standards, Specifications, Materials and Testing • http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/cnstrctengr.htm • Materials Division Contacts • http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/materials/index.htm • Materials & Testing e-Guide • http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/materials/materials.htm

  19. Links of Note • Guidelines (Binder Selection and Thickness by Type) • http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/materials/pdfs/GUIDE-01.pdf • Approved Performance Graded Binders and Others • http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/materials/htm-smap/11062p-BIT.htm • Approved Superpave Mix Designs • http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/materials/acmixportal.htm • 100 Years of Transportation 1911 – 2011 • www.okladot.state.ok.us/odot100

  20. Links of Note • Approved List of Anti-Strip Additives and WMA Technologies • http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/materials/htm-smap/11062p-ASA.htm • WMA Special Provisions • http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/c_manuals/specprov2009/pdfs/xspn411-13.pdf • http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/c_manuals/specprov2009/oe_sp_2009-708-22.pdf • WMA – Information in Detail • http://warmmixasphalt.com/

  21. Summary • Asphalt Mix Design Methods • Superpave Most Common in History • Laboratory Mixture Compactors • New SGC Compacts 6” Diameter Specimens • Asphalt Binders • Performance Graded Using Mechanical Properties • Aggregate Tests • Little Added • Mix Design Proof Testing • Rut Testing Prevents Premature Failure

  22. Summary • Design by Traffic Volume • Based on ESALs for 20 Years • Mix Design Notes • SGC Gyrations Critical for Predictive Performance • Future Items of Note • WMA – Adopted Nationwide Faster than Superpave

  23. Summary • 2009 Std. Spec. 411 • Pay Factors – Increased for Density by 10% and Removed Gradation • Links Of Note • Sources for Additional Information • Updated Daily as Applicable

  24. Special Thanks • Danny Gierhart, P.E. – Former Bituminous Engineer and Current Regional Asphalt Institute Engineer • Reynolds H. Toney, P.E., Materials Division Engineer • Audience • Especially Those with Questions

  25. Questions?

More Related