1 / 22

My Canada

My Canada. Montréal -8 hours 4.5 hours to fly 56 hours to drive To Vancouver. Griff. Gilbert. Come visit Montréal - LORNET Conference - 14-17 November, 2006. www.lornet.org. TELCERT Workshop, Sofia, Bulgaria, March 31, 2006. IDLD – Towards a Repository of Reusable Instructional Designs.

danika
Download Presentation

My Canada

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. My Canada Montréal -8 hours 4.5 hours to fly 56 hours to drive To Vancouver Griff Gilbert

  2. Come visit Montréal - LORNET Conference - 14-17 November, 2006 www.lornet.org

  3. TELCERT Workshop, Sofia, Bulgaria, March 31, 2006 IDLD – Towards a Repository of Reusable Instructional Designs Gilbert Paquette Chaire de recherche en ingénierie cognitive et éducative (CICE) Centre de recherche LICEF, Téluq-UQAM

  4. AGD 1992-1995 MOT 2.0 MISA 2.0 1995-1997 1995-1997 1997-1998 MISA Templates MISA 3.0 MOT plus 1998-1999 1999-2002 ADISA MISA 4.0 MOT+LD 2005-2006 2003-2004 IDLD Portal MISA LD ID Work at the LICEF Research Centre

  5. The IDLD Portal www.idld.org

  6. ID Methods And Tools LCMSs, Platforms Portals IMS-LD (SCORM+) Instructional Engineering Delivery LOM IMS-LD Specification – A bridge between instructional methodology and LCMS platforms Learning System Environ-ments Resources (Objects) Plan and Models

  7. Learning Design Descriptions • Narrative • Descriptive Forms • UML Representation • MOT/MISA Representation • MOT+ XML-Schemas • MOT+LD Representation • LD XML-Schema (Manifest)

  8. I Method Prerequisite C I Learning Objectives Play C Act Learner C R C C I/P C Learning Activity Activity Structure Conference Environment C C C C I/P External eMail Learning Object Unit of C Outcome Staff Learning R Indexed search Support Activity MOT+LD Graphic Language(Level A - Method)

  9. A Metadata A A A MOT+LD Graphic Language– Itemization and Metadata Staff Learner Learning Activity I I I I I Learning Object Activity Structure Item (URI) I I I eMail Support Activity Conference

  10. Media Elements Units of Learning Tools Documents Actors Leaning Design as Resources Resources Operations Designs

  11. ARIADNE LORNET NIME MERLOT EDNA In a Global Network of Repositories

  12. Using the LOM to Metatag LDs in the IDLD Repository • Granularity (LOM 1.8) • Resources, Basic UoL (Nuggets), Courses, Programs • Relations (LOM 7.0) • Between Aggregates and Component Nuggets; • Between Representation Formats • Between Examplars and Patterns (Templates) • Classifications (LOM 9.0) • Learning Design Typology (From MISA and CETIS) • Cognitive Strategy Typology (Bloom Extension)

  13. Classification des scénarios

  14. Metatagging LDs

  15. Search and Access to LDs

  16. Reusability Process • Modeling a Course and Generalizing to a Pattern (Instructional Strategy Level) • Decomposing into Nuggets or Direct Creation (Instructional Tactic Level) • Recomposition of a Course Pattern from Nuggets (New Strategy) • Specification of Course Pattern to one or more Course Examplar

  17. Step 1 – Course Pattern

  18. Step 2 – Course Pattern Decompostion into Nuggets

  19. Step 3 - Recomposition of a new Course Pattern

  20. Conclusion: Graphical Representation and Use of the LOM • Graphic Representation • Provide a Global View of an LD • Facilitate LD Construction and Reuse (Patterns, Decomposition, Recomposition, Specification) • Produice a standard LD XML manifest • Can be read in RELOAD for levels B and C • Using the LOM to Reference LDs • Search in a Global Reporitories Network • Navigation between related LDs

  21. Conclusions: LD Deployment • Building Graphic LD was easy for the four teams involved in the IDLD project, but not necessarily for the average professor • Extend the set of Graphic Learning Designs linked to Narratives and other representations • Simplify the Graphic Language by building a more intelligent parser for the production of the IMS-LD manifest and its validation • A promissing approach: to simplify and improve the design process by giving access to alternative high quality LD solutions A Invitation to Link your LDs With OURS

  22. TELCERT Workshop, Sofia, Bulgaris, March 31, 2006 IDLD – Towards a Repostiroy of Reusable Instructional Designs Gilbert Paquette Chaire de recherche en ingénierie cognitive et éducative (CICE) Centre de recherche LICEF, Téluq-UQAM www.idld.org www.licef.teluq.uquebec.ca/gp

More Related