revealing the heavily obscured agn population with radio selection
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Revealing the heavily obscured AGN population with radio selection

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 11

Revealing the heavily obscured AGN population with radio selection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 104 Views
  • Uploaded on

Revealing the heavily obscured AGN population with radio selection. Aim: to find ALL the AGN. Wilkes, Kuraszkiewicz , Atanas , Haas, Barthel , Willner , Leipski , Worrall Birkinshaw , Antonucci,Ogle , U.T. Cobley & all. Powerful, FRII Radio Galaxies.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Revealing the heavily obscured AGN population with radio selection' - dandre


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
revealing the heavily obscured agn population with radio selection

Revealing the heavily obscured AGN population with radio selection

Aim: to find ALL the AGN

Wilkes, Kuraszkiewicz, Atanas,

Haas, Barthel, Willner, Leipski, Worrall Birkinshaw, Antonucci,Ogle,

U.T. Cobley& all

HEAD Meeting

Chicago

powerful frii radio galaxies
Powerful, FRII Radio Galaxies
  • 3CRR, z~1-2, low-frequency radio-selected
  • High L/LEdd, log L~1045-46 ergs-1
  • Orientation is dominant variable

Cygnus A

HEAD Meeting

Chicago

chandra x ray luminosities for nl bl agn
Chandra X-ray Luminosities for NL+BL AGN

Log Hard X-ray Luminosity

Log Radio Luminosity (5GHz)

  • Radio (=AGN) Power comparable
  • X-ray (“observed”) luminosity of NL sources 10-1000* lower

HEAD Meeting

Chicago

x ray hardness ratio
X-ray Hardness Ratio

QSO

z~0.5-1, 3CRRs

NLRG

  • Simple Unification:
    • QSO – face-on: bright + soft (Γ~1.9)
    • NLRG – edge-on: faint + hard
  • Exceptions:
    • 2 QSOs + 1 NLRG: intermediate
    • 5 soft NLRG

Soft

Hard

X-ray Hardness Ratio

HEAD Meeting

Chicago

x ray luminosity is obscured
Compton ThickX-ray Luminosity is obscured
  • HR hardens as LX decreases
  • Weakest sources include 2ndcomponent: soft excess
  • Possibilities:
    • Scattered nuclear light
    • Extended emission (NLR?) (Wang et al.)
    • Jet-related (Hardcastle et al.)
  • Obscuration → decrease Lx
  • Hard to find + measure obscured sources
  • HR ≠> NH for low LX

Intermediate QSOs

Soft NLRG

QSOs

HEAD Meeting

Chicago

compton thick l oiii l x
Compton Thick? : L[OIII]/LX
  • 4 soft + 5 hard NLRGs:
    • high L([OIII]λ5007)/LX
  • → 9 Compton Thick (CT) candidates
  • X-ray absorption:
    • HR → NH~1020-23cm-2
    • L[OIII]/LX→ NH>1024.5cm-2
  • LX/LR → NHestimate for low S/N sources

Juneau et al. 2011

Edge-on Radio Core Fraction Face-on

HEAD Meeting

Chicago

x ray absorption vs radio core fraction
Radio Core FractionX-ray Absorption vs. Radio Core-Fraction
  • Strongly correlated
  • → Observed X-rays are consistent with orientation dependent obscuration of Unified Models

Edge-on

Face-on

HEAD Meeting

Chicago

n h distribution
NH Distribution
  • NLRG NH peaks at high values, >1024cm-2
  • Consistent with z<1 3CRRs

(Hardcastle et al 2009)

  • Obscured fraction ~ 0.5 higher than typical 0.1-0.3 for high Luminosity AGN
  • CT fraction ~ 0.2
  • Consistent with CXRB models (Gilli et al. 2007)

HEAD Meeting

Chicago

conclusions
Conclusions
  • Orientation alone → range of *1000 in observed LX
  • High S/N X-ray spectra required to accurately estimate intrinsic NHand LX → both generally underestimated
  • Underestimation of intrinsic LX leads to:
    • High LXAGN: unobscured, #s underestimated
    • Low LX AGN: obscured, #s overestimated
    • Thus:
      • Luminosity Functions } increase towards lower LX
      • Obscured fractions }

HEAD Meeting

Chicago

luminosity function and obscured fraction
Luminosity Function and obscured fraction

Mayo & Lawrence 2013

50% covered

Change in LF if all are CT

Obscured fraction vs LX

HEAD Meeting

Chicago

conclusions1
Conclusions
  • Luminosity Functions may be flatter, high luminosity active galaxies more numerous than currently deduced
  • A luminosity-dependent obscured fraction may not be required to explain X-ray and optical data

Take care when estimating obscuration for sources in X-ray samples

HEAD Meeting

Chicago

ad