1 / 8

Kurt W. Fisher Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy

Closeout Report on the Review Committee for the Muon g-2 Project Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory September 18, 2013. Kurt W. Fisher Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy http://www.science.doe.gov/opa/. 2.1 Beamline R. Gerig, ANL* / SC-1.

daire
Download Presentation

Kurt W. Fisher Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Closeout Report on the Review Committee for the Muon g-2 Project Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory September 18, 2013 Kurt W. Fisher Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy http://www.science.doe.gov/opa/

  2. 2.1 BeamlineR. Gerig, ANL* / SC-1 • Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements? • Does the proposed project team have appropriate management experience, design skills, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  3. 2.2 Storage RingM. Ross, SLAC* / SC-2 • Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements? • Does the proposed project team have appropriate management experience, design skills, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  4. 2.3 DetectorsW. Wisniewski, SLAC* / SC-3 • Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements? • Does the proposed project team have appropriate management experience, design skills, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  5. 2.4 EngineeringK. Fouts, SLAC* / SC-4 • Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements? • Does the proposed project team have appropriate management experience, design skills, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  6. 3. Cost and ScheduleE. Merrill, DOE/SC* / SC-5 • Do the conceptual design report and documentation appropriately support the stated cost range and project duration? • Does the proposed project team have appropriate management experience, design skills, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  7. 3. Cost and ScheduleE. Merrill, DOE/SC* / SC-5

  8. 4. Project ManagementD. Green, Retired FNAL* / SC6 • Does the proposed project team have appropriate management experience, design skills, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline? • Are ES&H aspects being properly addressed and are future plans sufficient given the project’s current stage of development? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

More Related