1 / 32

5. Sediment transport models

5. Sediment transport models. Settling velocity ( v f ): Stoke’s equation. Assumption: spherical particles Gravity force = drag force Particle reaches a constant settling velocity

craigcjones
Download Presentation

5. Sediment transport models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 5. Sediment transport models Huttula Lecture Set 4

  2. Settling velocity (vf): Stoke’s equation • Assumption: spherical particles • Gravity force = drag force • Particle reaches a constant settling velocity • This velocituy is dependent on: fluid viscosity (), density difference between the particle and water (s-) and particle diameter (d), • g=gravity constant= 9,81 m/s2 • Velocity range: From 0.07 m/d (clay, d=1.2 m) to 710 m/d (sand, d=200m), density=2.5 gcm-3 Huttula Lecture Set 4

  3. Settling speed in nature • Particles are seldom spherical: clay particles are like plates • Aggregation of particles happens due to the electromagnetic forces  cohesive soils (clays, mud…) • Organic compounds like humic substances have a very fragile structure  changes even in water column •  velocity from Stoke’s equation has to be corrected with empirical relations • Baba& Komar, 1981: vreal=0.761vf • In sediment transport models vf is calculated using the median particle size from a surface sediment sample Huttula Lecture Set 4

  4. Erosion or resuspension from bottom • Acting forces on a particle laying on the bottom • difference between gravity on buoyancy • drag force by the current • lifting force due to the pressure differences as caused by water flowing between particles • electromagnetic forces causing aggregation • Term 1.  density difference and particle (diameter)3 • Terms 2 and 3.  shear force caused by current and particle (diameter)2 • Shields’s empirical curve for erosion  in design of structures • A simplified erosion curve by Hjulström (erosion vs. current velocity) • In models we use most often the critical shear concept Huttula Lecture Set 4

  5. Hjulström’s curve for erosion Huttula Lecture Set 4

  6. Critical shear • Total shear () on the lake bottom = • shear by orbital movements of waves = f(wind fetch over lake, lake mean depth, wind velocity and duration)Materials\Lake Säkylän Pyhäjärvi.pdf • shear by currents •  > critical shear (cr), erosion happens with a rate a*(excess shear)b • cr, a and b are experimental values, which we calibrate during model application • values for cr: 0.008…1 Nm-2, b=1..3, a = depends on sediment • In this formulation there is no consolidation effects and bottom morphology included Huttula Lecture Set 4

  7. Calculation of sediment transport • Simple screening tools:http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/dots/doer/tools.html • Using numerical flow models for predicting the horizontal current field • Suspended solids concentration is calculated with concentration equation • Following terms in concentration equation: • advection with settling speed in vertical dimension • turbulence • mass flow from tributaries and to out flowing river • settling and deposition to bottom • erosion or resuspension from bottom Huttula Lecture Set 4

  8. Example from Mänttä 2DH flow model with BOD7 water quality compartment Sediment was light organic fibre Short term regulation at hydropower plant Huttula Lecture Set 4

  9. Example from Karhijärvi • Three different models were tested 2DH, 2DV and 3D model • Models were tested in an runoff case in Oct 1992, when heavy rains caused erosion from watershed and a heavy suspended solids load to lake • Data: winds on the lake, water current observations, turbidity observations •  3D model gave best results Huttula Lecture Set 4

  10. Mänttä: Transport model resultSediment: fibrous material Huttula Lecture Set 4

  11. Sediment transport in Tanganyika • Model simulation • lake wide circulation model boundary values (current velocity) for high resolution model at river mouths • flow model and suspended sediment transport models • SS input was estimated from historical data • real winds from atmospheric model HIRLAM (this model was used first time in tropics) Huttula Lecture Set 4

  12. 3D FLOW MODEL Calculated depth-averaged flow on 24.08.97 04:00. Huttula Lecture Set 4 Calculated depth-averaged flow on 24.08.97 20:00

  13. 3D SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODEL (A), 12:00 24.08.97 (B) 0:00 28.08.97 (C) after 22, 82 and 166 hours after the simulation start respectively. Huttula Lecture Set 4

  14. 6. Water quality models Huttula Lecture Set 4

  15. Huttula Lecture Set 4

  16. Concentration equation where, • c = concentration, qL= amount of loading release , n= length measure against release, u,v,w = x-, y- ja z- advective velocities in x-, y- ja z- directions, Dx, Dy, Dz = dispersion coefficients, R(T,c) = biogeochemical changes in concentration Huttula Lecture Set 4

  17. Application of WQ-models • We include : • Advection • Dispersion • Settling on the bottom • Bio- chemical processes • Decomposition, respiration, aeration, anaerobic release of P from the bottom • Select the most important variables concerning the problem • Oxygen, nutrients (like P,N), chlorophyll-a and some conservative substance (like Na) • Limiting factors (light, nutrients, …) must be included. Check! • Temperature corrections must be included. Check! Huttula Lecture Set 4

  18. Lake Lappajärvi WQ-model • PROBE temperature model • Materials\Effects of Climate Change....pdf • PROBE-WQ model • Materials\Lappajarvi_WQ.pdf Huttula Lecture Set 4

  19. Oxygen model Huttula Lecture Set 4

  20. Phytoplankton biomass and ToTP Huttula Lecture Set 4

  21. Huttula Lecture Set 4

  22. Huttula Lecture Set 4

  23. Huttula Lecture Set 4

  24. Huttula Lecture Set 4

  25. Huttula Lecture Set 4

  26. Interactions in EIA-SYKE-model Huttula Lecture Set 4

  27. Huttula Lecture Set 4

  28. Huttula Lecture Set 4

  29. Huttula Lecture Set 4

  30. Huttula Lecture Set 4

  31. Other WQ-model applications • Several case studies Materials\Flow_and_WQ_Models_Sarkkula.pdf • Lake Pyhäselkä • Materials\Pyhaselka.pdf • What happened to WQ after real reduction of loads? • Materials\IAWQ99.pdf Huttula Lecture Set 4

  32. Summary of WQ-model calculations • Check that you have data to describe WQ in variable discharge and loading conditions • Select those properties (variables), which describe best the effects of loading and concentrate calibration on them • Use most simple parameterization of the variables • First coefficient values from literature and by experience • Compare the calculated and observed values • Select the conditions (weather, discharge and loading) during which the effects are described ….and run the model!! Huttula Lecture Set 4

More Related