1 / 14

Calibration of the OMNIS-LPC Supernova Neutrino Detector

Calibration of the OMNIS-LPC Supernova Neutrino Detector. Outline OMNIS Experiment and Detectors Lead Slab & Plastic Scintillator Lead Perchlorate SNS2 OMNIS Calibration Experiment Goals LPC Module Event identification Event rate estimates Background rate estimates Conclusion.

coxp
Download Presentation

Calibration of the OMNIS-LPC Supernova Neutrino Detector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Calibration of the OMNIS-LPC Supernova Neutrino Detector • Outline • OMNIS Experiment and Detectors • Lead Slab & Plastic Scintillator • Lead Perchlorate • SNS2 OMNIS Calibration Experiment • Goals • LPC Module • Event identification • Event rate estimates • Background rate estimates • Conclusion Richard Talaga, Argonne

  2. OMNIS Overview Observation of Neutrinos from Galactic Supernovae • Expected Number of Supernovae: ~3 per century OMNIS: Observatory for Multiflavor Neutrinos from Supernovae • Detection of νμντ νe + antineutrinos • Identification of νe • Sensitive to different type of neutrino than Super-K • OMNIS: νe • Super-K: νe–bar • Planned Lifetime of the Experiment: ~ 50 years • Locations: WIPP and possibly DUSEL • Number of neutrino events from one Supernova ~2,200 from Galactic Center (8kpc); ~400 from far side of the Milky Way Richard Talaga, Argonne

  3. Two Types of Detectors forOMNIS • 2 kT: Lead Slabs & (Scintillators + Gd Sheets) • Four ½ kT Modules • Detect neutrons produced from ν – Pb cc & nc interactions • Number of neutrino events from 8kpc Supernova: ~1,500 • 1 kT: Lead Perchlorate Dissolved in Water • Twenty 50 -Ton modules • Detect neutrons produced from ν – Pb cc & nc interactions • Detect electrons produced from νe – Pb cc interactions • Measure the Energy spectrum ofνe events • Number of neutrino events from 8kpc Supernova: ~ 700 Richard Talaga, Argonne

  4. OMNISLead+Plastic Scintillator Detector • Detection Method: ν + Pb  X + (1 or 2 neutrons) • “prompt signal” ~1 MeV neutron excites scintillator • “delayed signal”~30μs later,thermalized n captures on Gd • Obtain a rough energy spectrum of neutrinos from rate of single neutron to double neutron events • Note: cc and nc signals are indistinguishable • Why Lead? • Large neutrino cross section and low threshold (7.4 MeV for one-neutron nc events 9.8 MeV for single neutron cc events) • High neutron production efficiency • Low neutron absorption Richard Talaga, Argonne

  5. OMNISLead Perchlorate Detector A Transparent LeadPerchlorate-Water Solution* (Pb[ClO4]2, soluble up to 80% by weight  density = 2.7) • CC Detection Method: νe + Pb  e- + Bi + (1 or 2 neutrons) • “prompt signal”e-Čerenkov ring • A 15 MeV e- travels only ~ 3cm and emits ~550 photons • “delayed signal” ~ up to 50μs later, n + Cl  γ’s (8.6 MeV) (~25 – 50 us thermalization time constant) • Measurement ofνeenergy spectrum(E νe = Epromt + ηEnthreshold) • ηEnthreshold accounts for the Q value of the interaction • Note: the detected νerepresent theenergy spectra ofνμ & ντbefore MSW transitions in the stellar medium *S.R. Elliott Phys. Rev. C62 065802 (2000) Richard Talaga, Argonne

  6. SNS2OMNIS Calibration Experiment • Goals • Demonstrate LPC to be a viable ν detector • Identify prompt e- signal from νe cc interactions • Čerenkov ring, timing • Identify delayed nsignals from Cl capture • Diffuse spray of photons from multiple gammas • Verify the νe energy spectrum from (Eprompt + ηEn threshold ) • Determine cc and nc event rates in LPC • Cross sections have been calculated for 208Pb • Expect 206Pb and 207Pb to be similar • Extract cross sections: νe ,νμand νμ Richard Talaga, Argonne

  7. OMNIS LPC Module: Glass-lined Stainless Steel Cylindrical Tank 2 m ~ 30 Tons <------------------- 3 m ------------------> Richard Talaga, Argonne

  8. OMNIS LPC Module & CC EventDetect prompt electron & delayed neutron(s) V = 10.6 m^3 Phototubes LPC weighs Prompt e- & Č ring ^ 28.6 Tons 1.5 m Delayed:n capture severalγ v Phototubes Phototubes are in water-tight enclosures Richard Talaga, Argonne

  9. CC Events: Prompt electron & delayed neutron • νe + 208Pb  e- + (207Bi+ 1n) or (206Bi+2n) n + Cl  X + γ’s (8.6 MeV) • Detection Method • Identify prompt e- path-length is only a few cm • characteristic Čerenkov “ring” • timing (< ~6 us after start of beamspill) • Identify neutron(s) via delayed delayed capture on Cl • window up to ~ 50 us after spill • Consequence: 50 us gate increases probability for cosmic ray background events Richard Talaga, Argonne

  10. NC Events: Detect the Neutrons • ν + 208Pb  (207Pb+ 1n)or(206Pb+2n) n + Cl  X + γ’s (8.6 MeV) But there is no promptneutron signal • recoil protons don’t produce Č radiation • Neutron capture signal occurs up to ~ 50 us after beam spill • Detection Method: Statistical • Look for neutron capture in window up to ~ 50 us after spill • n capture exhibits exponential time structure • Subtract signal rate not associated with beam • Understand the beam-associated neutron background • Optimize shielding between beam stop & detector • Surround LPC with boron-loaded paraffin Richard Talaga, Argonne

  11. Event Rate Estimate Rates are based on MC simulations of 4m LPC detector Rates for 3m LPC SNS2 Calibration Detector: Neutrino Flux: 1.7 x 107/s-cm^2 for each of three neutrino species • cc events: ~ 230/day (100% ε )  ~60/day with 25% ε • nc events: ~ 30/day (100% ε )  ~8/day with 25% ε These are conservative estimates “25% ε” includes geometrical and other efficiencies Richard Talaga, Argonne

  12. Background Sources • Cosmic rays • Muons: 2.5 x 108 per day 2,900 Hz • “Prompt” gate duration: 6 us after start of spill (~90% u decays) • Singles rate  1 Hz • “Delayed” gate duration: 50us after start of spill (misidentified neutron) Singles rate  8.7 Hz • Neutrons: 1.4 x106 per day  16 Hz • “Delayed” gate duration: 50 us after start of spill • Singles rate  0.05Hz • Question: What is the rate of neutrons that get captured by Cl? This is the number that really matters. • Beam-associated neutron backgrounds • 1 accidental event/day implies that 1 beam-associated neutron thermalizes and stops in detector per day. • Question: What is the expected rate of beam-associated neutrons that are captured by Cl? Richard Talaga, Argonne

  13. Background Rate Estimate • Accidental Rates: CC events • Promt = muon; Delayed = muon; 13,000 events/day • Promt = muon; Delayed = neutron: 73 events/day • Reject prompt muons with active Veto System • 99% efficient veto: muon-muon rate  1.3 events/day muon-neutron rate  0.7 events/day • Muon Č “ring” signature reduces misidentification by factor > 20 • Characteristic signature: bright (~20k-30k photons) and thick “ring” • Conclude that CC backgrounds are negligible • Accidental Rates: NC events • Delayed = muon : 752,000/day • 99.9% veto  752/day • Characteristic Č “ring” signature  ~ 40/day • Delayed = neutron: (assume all n captured) 4,300/day • Planned neutron shielding will reduce rate by x 100  43/day This can be measured & subtracted very accurately • Conclude that NC backgrounds are manageable with a 99.9% veto Richard Talaga, Argonne

  14. Conclusions • SNS2 is an excellent facility to calibrate OMNIS LPC • Expect ~80 cc and ~10 nc events per day • Cosmic raybackgrounds • Negligible for CC • Manageable for NC • Beam-associated neutron-capture rate must be low • OMNIS requires a specialized detector tank • Can’t use a multi-purpose tank for LPC • Plan to use a 3m x 2m glass-lined stainless steel tank • Might require space for external neutron absorber • A 99.9% efficient veto would be helpful in removing fake muon signals that contribute to nc measurement Richard Talaga, Argonne

More Related