rethinking the bau energy paradigm n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Rethinking the BAU energy paradigm PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Rethinking the BAU energy paradigm

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 21

Rethinking the BAU energy paradigm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Rethinking the BAU energy paradigm. Liam Salter Head, Climate Programme WWF Hong Kong ICCC May 2007. Six principles for change. Outline. The concept of business as usual energy paradigm Technology mixes for climate protection Six principles for reform Hong Kong and the six principles

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

Rethinking the BAU energy paradigm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
rethinking the bau energy paradigm

Rethinking the BAU energy paradigm

Liam Salter

Head, Climate Programme

WWF Hong Kong

ICCC May 2007

Six principles for change

  • The concept of business as usual energy paradigm
  • Technology mixes for climate protection
  • Six principles for reform
  • Hong Kong and the six principles
  • Conclusions
thinking paradigms
Thinking ‘Paradigms’

“At any time in history there is a ruling paradigm within the constraints of which most thinking takes place.”

“When its effectiveness diminishes and it begins to break down, a paradigm shift takes place and a new paradigm comes into being.”

(Reddy, 2002)

thinking paradigms1
Thinking ‘Paradigms’
  • GROSSCON – GRowth Oriented, Supply Sided, CONsumption directed
  • DEFENDUS – DEvelopment Focused, END Use oriented, Service directed

The late Amulya Reddy

thinking paradigms2
Thinking Paradigms
  • Hard energy path – the more energy we use the better off we are
  • Soft energy path – energy is a means to social ends. Energy services are tailored to needs.

Amory Lovins


“… any plausible BAU scenario entails continuing increases in global temperatures, well beyond levels previously experienced by humankind …” (Stern Report)

IEA WEO 2004


wwf 400 ppm co 2 e
WWF 400 ppm CO2e

WWF Climate Solutions Report (2007)

common features of low carbon scenarios
Common features of low carbon scenarios
  • No technology silver bullet
  • In the short to medium term the bulk of emissions reductions come from massive improvements energy efficiency.
  • The structural shift towards a low carbon energy supply tends to dominate the reduction potential over the longer term. Preparing low carbon supply technologies for substantial increases in market share post - 2050 was a key priority in the short-medium term.
  • Key common supply technologies across many models were renewable energy and carbon capture and storage.
back to paradigm thinking
Back to paradigm thinking
  • BAU / GROSSCON / Hard Energy Path will not protect us from climate change
  • What will it take to bring these technologies to market?
  • Evidence suggests that there is no ‘policy bullet’ either
  • Require a comprehensive rethink of BAU / GROSSCON / Hard Energy Path that delivers on other energy policy objectives such as access to energy and energy security concerns
rethinking energy system drivers
Rethinking energy system drivers
  • Valuation and pricing
  • Supply vs. demand
  • Consumer participation
  • Infrastructure
  • Planning
  • Technology development

Using principles and techniques already in use today

2 caveats:

Not intended as an exhaustive list

Limitations of power sector oriented analysis

true costing in practice
True costing in practice
  • Carbon emissions trading
    • USD 24 billion in 2006 and potentially the world’s largest commodity market
    • Can deliver the true cost of carbon only if linked to ambitious compliance targets
  • Suite of measures is required to reflect even partial true cost to all consumers
    • Taxes
    • Emissions charges
    • Technology standards
  • Uncertainty often cited as the reason for avoiding a holistic approach to true costing
efficiency first
Efficiency first

Packages and tools vary by country and sector

Policy targets critical to evaluate performance of packages e.g. China’s 11 Five Year Plan

Minimum standards – appliances, buildings, automobiles

Sector specific programmes e.g. China’s top - 1000 programme

Consumer engagement and labeling

Financing schemes

Public procurement

True costs

rethinking the consumer promoting participation
Rethinking the consumer:Promoting participation

“Economics drive customers. Customers drive markets. But first, they must be informed, educated and challenged” Rose McKinney-James, former President and CEO of the Corporation for Solar Technology and Renewable Resources, Nevada.

"We must understand clearly that public participation is the right and interest of the people endowed by law. The government has the obligation to respond to and to protect this right.“ Pan Yue, SEPA Vice-Minister

participation in practice
Participation in practice
  • ‘Community Choice’

Laws passed in Massachusetts, Ohio, and New Jersey and Rhode Island in recent years,

One programme involving over half a million customers has already achieved a 33% greenhouse gas reduction in its electricity without a rate increase.

12 Californian cities, 3 million residents finalising Ordinance to achieve 40% green electricity from green power

  • Civil society watchdogs supporting power sector regulation in Maharashtra, India

1999-2000 - Civil society analysis of MSEB tariff proposals revealed accounting irregularities and allowed the regulator to insist on enhanced energy efficiency

remaining 3 principles
Remaining 3 principles
  • Decentralisation
  • Master planning
  • Bringing critical technologies to market

‘Its not that we need new ideas, but we need to stop having old ideas’.

Edwin Land

A paradigm shift using DEFENDUS or Soft Energy Path style logic is required to protect the world from climate change. ‘Tinkering around the edges’ will not bring the major shifts in technology required to cut emissions.

Paradigm shift must go beyond technology analysis and understand the system-level issues that drive technology choice

Beyond technology paradigm shift can be defined concretely in terms of specific principles which can be used as the basis for energy policy analysis and development

Can a focus on principles move us out of our ‘technology boxes’? And actually improve our ability to build consensus?

Thank You!