1 / 25

Presentation by: Sanjun Chen Noah Harris Haley Lai Nicolas Tollie

Alpha. Global Asset Allocation. Presentation by: Sanjun Chen Noah Harris Haley Lai Nicolas Tollie. Introduction. Industries Factors. Scoring. Results. Conclusions. Agenda. Agenda. Introduction Methodology Industry Manufacturing Services Finance Transportation/Utilities

colin-gates
Download Presentation

Presentation by: Sanjun Chen Noah Harris Haley Lai Nicolas Tollie

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Alpha Global Asset Allocation Presentation by: Sanjun Chen Noah Harris Haley Lai Nicolas Tollie 0

  2. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Agenda Agenda • Introduction • Methodology • Industry • Manufacturing • Services • Finance • Transportation/Utilities • Factors • 1-Year EPS Growth • Forward E/P • Dividend Yield • Inventory Turnover • Scored Strategy Returns • Subjective Estimates • Conclusions 1

  3. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Introduction Establishing Long-Short Trading Strategy • Objective • Generate positive returns • Limit risk through hedging • Quantitative stock screen • Industry driven • Find predictive powers on positive and negative returns • Select factors with strong predictive powers • Go long stocks in top quintile • Go short stocks in bottom quintile 2

  4. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Methodology Description of parameters used for screening process • Sample • US equities listed on both NYSE and NASDAQ • Monthly data • In-sample time frame: 1990 – 1999 • Out-of-sample time frame: 2000 – 2004 • Selected Industries with at least 100 companies • Allocated factors into quintiles based on selected criteria • Rebalanced and resorted each month • Analyzed output and performance over time 3

  5. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Factors Description of Factors • Forward E/P: Expected next twelve months earnings over current price • Dividend Yield: Dividend Yield from Factset • EPS Growth: (IBES projection for next twelve months – This year earning)/ This year earning • Inventory Turnover: Sales/Inventory 4

  6. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Industries Chosen 5

  7. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Manufacturing 1-Year EPS Growth is a fairly good factor for Equal and Value Weighted • Quintile 4 Significant • Quintile 1 not consistently enough best performing portfolio, and quintile 5 not consistently enough worst performing portfolio 3.5 1.5 6

  8. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Manufacturing Forward E/P is a good factor for Equal Weighted • Quintile 5 Significant • Quintile 1 not consistently enough worst performing portfolio 4.5 7

  9. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Scoring Subjective Scoring of different Factors 8

  10. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Out-of-Sample Results Manufacturing 9

  11. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Out-of-Sample Results Services 10

  12. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Out-of-Sample Results Finance 11

  13. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Out-of-Sample Results Trans/Utilities 12

  14. Introduction Industries Factors Scoring Results Conclusions Conclusions? • Scoring Screens • Mixed to poor results out of sample • Conflicting performance of equal and value weighted screens • Good performances (Manufacturing equal weighted, Utility weighted). Luck? • Possible Improvements • More conservative scoring – only score factors that perform consistently across equal & value weighted • Industry groups too broad - test sub-groups • Bad in-sample/ out-of-sample time periods selections 90-99 Boom, 2000-2004 Bust • Test more factors • Use optimizer to modify scores • Benchmark performances vs. industry indices 13

  15. Manufacturing Dividend is a good factor for Equal and Value Weighted • Quintile 5 Significant • Quintile 1 and 2 give fairly poor performing portfolios -1.5 -1.5 2.5 -3 2.5 14

  16. Manufacturing Inventory Turnover is a good factor for Equal and Value Weighted • Quintile 5 Great performance for Equal, Worst for Value Weighted 4 3 -3.5 15

  17. Services 1-Year EPS Growth is a fairly good factor for Equal and Value Weighted • Quintile 1 generally poor performing portfolio • Quintile 4 consistently great performing portfolio -1 3 -2.5 2 16

  18. Services Forward E/P is a fairly good factor for Equal and Value Weighted • Quintile 1 poor performing portfolio most of the time -2 -2 -1.5 1.5 17

  19. Services Dividend is a good factor for Equal Weighted • Quintile 1 Significant poor performance -2.5 18

  20. Finance 1-Year EPS Growth is a fairly good factor for Equal Weighted • Quintile 2 generally poor performing portfolio -1 19

  21. Finance Forward E/P is a fairly good factor for Equal and Value Weighted • Quintile 4 poor performing portfolio most of the time for Equal Weighted • Quintile 1 good performance for Value Weighted -1.5 1.5 20

  22. Finance Dividend is a good factor for Equal • Quintile 1 Significant good performance 2 -1 1 1 21

  23. Finance Inventory Turnover is a fairly good factor for Value Weighted • Quintile 5 fairly consistent good performance for Value Weighted -1.5 2 22

  24. Trans/Utilities Dividend is a good factor for Equal • Quintile 2 consistently poor performance; Quintile 5 consistently great performance -4 4.5 23

  25. Trans/Utilities Inventory Turnover is a fairly good factor for Value Weighted • Quintile 5 fairly consistently poor performance for Value Weighted -3 -2.5 24

More Related