monitoring grocott s policy n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Monitoring Grocott’s Policy: PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Monitoring Grocott’s Policy:

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 14

Monitoring Grocott’s Policy: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 104 Views
  • Uploaded on

Monitoring Grocott’s Policy:. Research Team : Thanduxolo Jika Modise Kabeli Thandy Kunene Susan Nakacwa Thando Sebesho. Research Aims:. To identify trends followed in monitoring policy To establish who is better placed for the responsibility of monitoring policy

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Monitoring Grocott’s Policy:' - cole-pollard


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
monitoring grocott s policy
Monitoring Grocott’s Policy:

Research Team:

  • Thanduxolo Jika
  • Modise Kabeli
  • Thandy Kunene
  • Susan Nakacwa
  • Thando Sebesho
research aims
Research Aims:
  • To identify trends followed in monitoring policy
  • To establish who is better placed for the responsibility of monitoring policy
  • Provide propositions for monitoring Grocott’s policy
research methods
Research Methods:

Qualitative research:

  • Interviews
  • E-mails
  • In-depth (open ended) questions
findings
Findings:
  • Grocott’s does not have a formalized document that outlines who is responsible for monitoring policy
  • Only an arbitrary level of implementation of arbitrary policy decisions exists
  • Readers have been acting as watchdogs e.g. calling-in to complain about something published
grocott s organogram
Grocott’s Organogram:

Board of Directors

Board of

Advisors

General Manager

Adverts

Editor

Publishing

advisory board
Advisory Board:

Advisory Board Members

Editorial Policy

Expert/s

Financial

Expert/s

Legal

Expert/s

Other

Expert/s

Policy Awareness

  • Focus Groups
  • Media Campaigns
  • Public Meetings
recommendations
Recommendations:
  • There should be a Qualitative Review of each issue - this will help the editor monitor the quality of the newspaper, especially in the beginning stages.
  • The Review can be as simple as passing a copy of the newspaper to all people responsible for content & production, & asking them to mark criticisms and suggestions on the copy for all to see.
recommendations continued
Recommendations continued:

Composition of the Advisory Board:

  • Should be representative

- consist of members with diff. expertise, e.g authorities in the areas of law, finance, education, editorial policy, etc.

- also, consist of different communities and social orientations in Grahamstown.

recommendations continued1
Recommendations continued:

Responsibilities:

Advisory Board (Policy Expert/s):

  • create policy awareness through media campaigns, focus groups & public meetings.
  • Sit-in & mediate on meetings to solve conflict regarding policy matters.
  • Investigate, judge or punish those responsible for lapses
recommendations continued2
Recommendations continued:

Responsibilities:

Editor:

  • clearly define & implement the editorial policy
  • establish procedures to maintain newspaper quality,
  • identify errors & problems,
  • detect trends & monitor possible failures that reflect a deterioration in quality, &
  • implement corrective actions as needed.
recommendations continued3
Recommendations continued:

Focus groups:

  • gather role players in all sectors for policy input
  • create policy awareness
  • review/assess adherence to policy - e.g. review articles on Grocott’s Mail for policy adherence.
recommendations continued4
Recommendations continued:

Radio broadcasts and press releases

  • For information broadcasts, awareness campaigns, creating a platform to call public meetings or give reminders e.g Radio Grahamstown, RMR and Grocott’s.
  • The radio stations will be mediums of giving feedback, responses and reminders.
recommendations continued5
Recommendations continued:

Public meetings

  • large scale meetings in different areas in Grahamstown.
  • should be recorded & have translators available for Xhosa or Afrikaans speakers.
  • Grocott’s Project e.g. GRAB – could use students on a voluntary basis
finally
Finally…

The Board of Advisors will, on their bi-annual meetings, submit an audit of the qualitative review to the Board of Directors.