90 likes | 107 Views
Explore findings on G20 and G8 compliance with Pittsburgh, London, and development commitments in global governance. This study delves into the change in member compliance within the G20 framework. It assesses not only G20 but also G8 and Non-G8 countries' adherence to summit commitments, shedding light on their performance regarding anti-protectionism measures. Dive into the nuanced landscape of global governance structures and the adherence to development commitments by G8 and G20 members. The research, conducted by Marina Larionova at the University Higher School of Economics in Moscow, offers valuable insights into accountability in international governance mechanisms.
E N D
Accountability in G20 Global Governance Marina Larionova University Higher School of Economics, Moscow
The main findings of the study 1 G20 compliance with Pittsburgh and London commitments
The main findings of the study 2 The change in G20 members’ compliance
The main findings of the study 3 G8 and Non-G8 compliance with Pittsburgh summit commitments
The main findings of the study 4 G8 and non-G8 compliance with 2009 London summit commitments
The main findings of the study 5 G20 average compliance with a commitment on fight against protectionism Note: according to the 2009 Aquila G8 Summit Draft Compliance Report, the average G8 compliance with this commitment slumps to -0.78 whereas G8 average compliance with the G20 commitment was assessed at a positive score of 0.11.
The main findings of the study 6 G8 compliance with development commitments
The main findings of the study 7 G20 compliance with development commitments