1 / 18

The iron ore, steel and steel products value chain

DTI RESPONSE TO IRON ORE, STEEL AND STEEL PRODUCTS VALUE CHAIN MATTERS PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF TRADE & INDUSTRY 24 AUGUST 2010. The iron ore, steel and steel products value chain. Source: DTI. The developmental gains of downstream beneficiation.

clardy
Download Presentation

The iron ore, steel and steel products value chain

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DTI RESPONSE TO IRON ORE, STEEL AND STEEL PRODUCTS VALUE CHAIN MATTERSPORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF TRADE & INDUSTRY24 AUGUST 2010

  2. The iron ore, steel and steel products value chain Source: DTI

  3. The developmental gains of downstream beneficiation Value-added, employment and investment per ton of steel along the iron ore, steel and steel products value chain Source: DTI

  4. Steel Industry Policy and Developments:Apartheid era to 2000 • 1927: Government established Iscor • Iscor treated as strategic for Apartheid industrialisation process supported by cheap electricity and extensive tariff protection • 1989: Iscor privatised and listed but with significant state shareholding via the IDC • Substantial state support for the restructuring and strengthening of SA Steel industry, especially in late 1990’s • 1996-1999: Joint venture between Iscor and IDC to build Saldhana plant (Iscor acquires full control in 2002) • S37E Tax Incentive • S37 H Tax Incentive (Strategic Investment Projects) • Intervention with US Government to avert anti-dumping duties

  5. Steel Industry Policy and Developments:2001 – 2004 • 2001: Unbundling into Iron Ore Mining (Kumba) and Steel Making (Iscor) with preservation of vertical integration through cost plus 3% access to iron ore • Unbundling of Iscor involved public developmental obligations: • To ensure the viability and cost-competitiveness of local steel production, and • To ensure a competitive steel pricing regime to support the development and deepening of value-added manufactured products in downstream industries • LNM introduced as international partner • Business Assistance Agreement (BAA): LNM to introduce efficiencies in exchange for generous fees, and right to raise shareholding • 2001 – 2004: LNM steadily raises shareholding in Iscor

  6. Steel Industry Policy and Developments:2004 – 2009 • 2004: LNM seeks Competition Tribunal approval to take majority shareholding • DTI and LNM agreement wherebye DTI supported majority LNM shareholding on the basis that “as soon as possible after attaining a majority shareholding” LNM would: • Conclude a steel pricing agreement with DTI that would replace import parity (IPP) with a sustainable, developmental pricing model that would raise the volume of downstream steel beneficiated in the SA economy for both the export and domestic markets. • Increase investment in liquid steel capacity, from 6mt/a to 9mt/a (including expansion of Saldanha Steel capacity to 2mt/a from 1.2mt/a in 2004) • The agreement acknowledged that the prevailing pricing system (import parity pricing) could not realise these downstream development objectives • LNM  Ispat  Mittal  ArcelorMittal: ArcelorMittal South Africa (AMSA)

  7. Steel Industry Policy and Developments:Import Parity Pricing – an Example Hot rolled coil domestic and export prices Source: Iscor, 2004

  8. Steel Industry Policy and Developments:2004 – 2010 • Extensive negotiations since 2004 • DTI tabled two sets of proposals • Export Parity Pricing • Basket Price comprising: • 50% match steel prices of major importers of metal and machinery products into SA • 50% average of countries in lowest quartile of global pricing • AMSA rejected either an export parity or cost-linked pricing model • 2006: AMSA unilaterally introduced “International Basket Price” system • 2009: AMSA unilaterally departs from its “International Basket Price” system • 2009: AMSA fails to convert mineral rights • 2010 • Commercial dispute between AMSA and KIO on supply arrangement • Contestation over access to mining right • AMSA introduces “iron ore surcharge” (subsequently subsumed into base steel price)

  9. Cost Structures Production Costs 2008 Q1: Hot Rolled Coil ($ per tonne) Source: MBR

  10. Pricing Hot Rolled Coil Prices (US$/Ton) 2004 – 2010 Source: MEPS, MBR, AMSA, DTI

  11. Performance of the SA iron-ore industry Iron ore sales: domestic and export 1990-2008, ‘000 tons Source: DMR

  12. Performance of the SA Steel industry Steel sales: domestic sales, exports, imports and embodied in value-added exports, tons ‘000 Source: SAISI and DTI estimates after 2008

  13. Performance of the SA Steel industry: Output Output of basic iron and steel, metal products and machinery sectors, 1990 – 2009, R’millions (2005) Source: Quantec

  14. Performance of the SA Steel industry: Employment Employment in basic iron and steel, metal products and machinery sectors, 1990 – 2009 Source: Quantec

  15. Performance of the SA Steel industry: producer prices Producer prices of basic iron and steel, metal products and machinery sectors, 1995 – 2009 (1995=100) Source:StatsSA

  16. Importance of steel pricing to downstream development Direct and indirect proportion of steel as an input into metal product and machinery sectors Source:StatsSA

  17. Importance of steel pricing to downstream development Estimated output and employment responsiveness of downstream steel firms to reductions in the domestic price of steel Source:CSID

  18. Interdepartmental Task Team • Ministers of Trade and Industry, Economic Development and Mineral Resources have established an Interdepartmental Task Team (IDTT) • The focus of this work is not on profit sharing between two companies but on giving effect to the original intent of the unbundling • IDTT’s mandate is to make recommendations on appropriate policy tools to ensure the public developmental obligations of the 2001 unbundling are given effect to and long term: • Viability and cost-competitiveness of local steel production • Competitive steel pricing to support the development and deepening of value-added manufactured products in downstream industries. • Policy tools • Mineral rights regime • Competition policy and legislation • Trade policy • Investment • Process • IDTT to develop recommendations and report back to Ministers and Portfolio Committees

More Related