1 / 29

COBY HOOGKAMP PROJECT COORDINATION FOLKERT KUIPERS INTERREG COORDINATION ALBERT RUITER

COBY HOOGKAMP PROJECT COORDINATION FOLKERT KUIPERS INTERREG COORDINATION ALBERT RUITER CONTROLLER FINANCIAL EXPERT IMAN HAMDOUNA PROJECT ASSISTENT ANNE DE VRIES PROJECTMANAGER. Subject Presentator. INTRODUCTION PROJECT EWM CHANCES/CHALLENGES.

claral
Download Presentation

COBY HOOGKAMP PROJECT COORDINATION FOLKERT KUIPERS INTERREG COORDINATION ALBERT RUITER

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. COBY HOOGKAMP PROJECT COORDINATION • FOLKERT KUIPERS INTERREG COORDINATION • ALBERT RUITER CONTROLLER FINANCIAL EXPERT • IMAN HAMDOUNA PROJECT ASSISTENT • ANNE DE VRIES PROJECTMANAGER

  2. Subject Presentator • INTRODUCTION • PROJECT EWM • CHANCES/CHALLENGES

  3. STRONG REGIONAL COHESION IN WASTE ACTIVITIES • PROVINCE ORGANIZED MAIN PLAYERS WASTE FIELD • FRISIAN WASTE ALLIANCE

  4. PARTNERS IN THE FRISIAN WASTE ALLIANCE AFVALSTURING FRYSLÂN NV • MIX OF GOVERNMENT/COMPANIE • ALL WASTE ACTIVITIES VAN DER WIEL HOLDING BV • METHANE RECOVERY • INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE CARTESIUS INSTITUUT • UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE • SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROVENCE FRYSLAN • ORGANISATION/COORDINATION

  5. The Province of Fryslân: Interreg projects

  6. Partners 1- Province of Fryslân, Regional; public authority. Leeuwarden; The Netherlands. 2- Afvalsturing Friesland N.V; Public equivalent body Leeuwarden; The Netherlands. 3- South East England Regional Assembly; Regional public authority. Guildford; United Kingdom. 4- PartneRing Adur and Worthing Services; local puplic authority. United Kingdom. 5- Surrey Country Councel; local public authority; Kingston upon Thames; United Kingdom. 6- Environment Agency; National public authority Worthing; United Kingdom. 7- Recycling Institute; public equivalent body Edinburgh; United Kingdom. 8- Polva City Government; local public authority Polva; Estonia. 9- University of Debrecen Center for Environmental Management and Policy; Public equivalent body; Debrecen; Hungary. 10- Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of Polish Academy of Sciences; public equivalent body; Krakow; Poland 11- Waste Disposal Company Halle-Lochau; Public eqqivalent body; Dolnitz; Germany. 12- Lag Appennino Genovese; Public equivalent body; Genova; Italy.

  7. Objectives Objectives Main objectives: • Develop innovative solutions for waste disposal. • Realise environmental friendly and cost effective regional waste management systems. Sub objectives: • New methods to decrease the amount of waste & increase the precentage of waste collected seperately and reused. • Improved more cost effective organization structures & Introduce new strategies on regional sale. • Co-operation between the partners of the project & develop a European partnership. • Overcome culture barries and build up a sustainable environment. • Main objectives: • Develop innovative solutions for waste disposal. • Realise environmental friendly and cost effective regional waste management systems. • Sub objectives: • New methods to decrease the amount of waste. • New methods to increase the precentage of waste collected seperately and reused. • Improved more cost effective organization structures. • Introduce new strategies on regional sale. • Co-operation between the partners of the project. • Developing a European partnership of regional partners. • Overcome culture barries and build up a sustainable environment.

  8. INTERREG PROJECTS INTERREG III B (LEADPARTNER) • NOLIMP (NORTH SEA REGIONAL LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE) • MOPARK (MOBILITY & NATIONAL PARKS) • SHARED SPACE (TRANSPORTATION) • FARMERS FOR NATURE • BIO ENERGY ( TESTING TECHNICS) • WATERCITY INTERNATIONAL

  9. Problem description GROWING WASTE PRODUCTION DIFFERENT RULES LEAD TO DIFFERENT SOLUTION FOR DISPOSAL WASTE SEARCHES CHEAPEST WAYS; LANDFILLING TECHNOLOGICAL & ORGANISATIONAL EXPERIENC ARE NEEDED TO DEVELOP NEW SOLUTIONS INTERREGIONAL COOPERATION IS NEEDED FOR IMPROVEMENT OF WASTE MANAGEMENT .

  10. Objectives Objectives Main objectives: • Develop innovative solutions for waste disposal. • Realise environmental friendly and cost effective regional waste management systems. Sub objectives: • New methods to decrease the amount of waste & increase the precentage of waste collected seperately and reused. • Improved more cost effective organization structures & Introduce new strategies on regional sale. • Co-operation between the partners of the project & develop a European partnership. • Overcome culture barries and build up a sustainable environment. • Main objectives: • Develop innovative solutions for waste disposal. • Realise environmental friendly and cost effective regional waste management systems. • Sub objectives: • New methods to decrease the amount of waste. • New methods to increase the precentage of waste collected seperately and reused. • Improved more cost effective organization structures. • Introduce new strategies on regional sale. • Co-operation between the partners of the project. • Developing a European partnership of regional partners. • Overcome culture barries and build up a sustainable environment.

  11. The four components in the project: 1- Overall Management and co-ordination:Province of Fryslân 2- Landfill and reuse: Waste Disposal Company Halle-Lochau 3- Separate collection: LAG Appennino Genovese 4- Organisation structure of Waste Management: Recycling Institute Edinburgh.

  12. Three phases to ensure innovative improvements . Three phases to ensure innovative improvements • 1- Each regoin will describe the important regional factors for the problem. • 2- Each region will use input from the other regions to generate possible solutions for the defined problem. • 3- Each region will work out one or two innovative solutions. Phase 1 Each region will describe the important regional factors for the problem. Phase 2 Each region will use input from the other regions to generate possible solutions for the defined problem. Phase 3 Each region will work out one or two innovative solutions.

  13. Three phases to ensure innovative improvements . RESULTS • (FEASIBILITIES) STUDIES, APPLICATIONS; • RECYCLING ACTIVITIES, • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESMENT • HANDLE PUBLIC RESISTANCE, • IMPROVEMENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE FIELD OF 3 MAIN THEMES • APPLICATION OF NEW INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • COSTS & BENEFITS OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO IMPROVE SEPARATE COLLECTION • PLAN NEW RECYCLING ACTIVITIES AT LANDFILL • DATABASE WITH REGIONAL INFORMATION • 1- Each regoin will describe the important regional factors for the problem. • 2- Each region will use input from the other regions to generate possible solutions for the defined problem. • 3- Each region will work out one or two innovative solutions.

  14. Communication Communication • The partners will set up a communication programme for the whole project. • The results will be communicated between the partners . • The brochures and articles will inform every interested person. • Articles in specialist journal will inform interested people. • The website will inform the partners, interested personen and organisations. • The main documents of the project will be translated into the language of the participating region Brochure Articles Seminars Translation Annual meetings Excurions Reports Newsletter Website

  15. Problem description • High amount of production and consumption lead to growing waste production in all European countries. • Waste is disposed of by landfilling in most European countries. • The rules in European countries differ, some waste companies choose acheap solutions which not always friendly for the disposal. • Technological and organisational experiences is needed to develop and find new solutions of waste management.

  16. Contribution to the objectives of the Interreg IIIC Programme Contribution to the objectives of the Interreg IIIC Programme • Exchange about waste disposal . • Plans for innovation on the issues of landfill and reuse. • Separate collection and cost effective organisations structures for management. • Co-operation among regions from different Interreg zones on waste management. • Website that provides the partners the opportunity to collect information about development. Exchange about waste disposal . Plans for innovation on the issues of landfill and reuse. Separate collection and Cost effective organisations structures for management. Co-operation among regions from different Interreg zones on waste management.

  17. Coordination and management Co-ordination and management • Asteering Group: Consists of two members of each partner. • The lead partner is Fryslân: • Wil provide aproject secretariat, project manager, project officer and financial controller. • Is responsible for the overall project activities. • Wil stimulate the partners to keep in contact with each other. • Lead partner contacts wil cover all project activities and stimulate the project progress. Province Fryslan (lead partner) provides: • project secretariat, project manager, project officer and financial controller. • Is responsible for the overall project activities. • stimulates the partners to keep in contact with each other & the project progress.

  18. Budget and duration Budget and duration Management Organisation €289.210 Landfill & Reuse € 299.452 Separate Collection € 457.184 Waste management € 331.426 Total budget: € 1.377.272 ERDF funding; € 843.654 National funding: € 533.618,- The project starts in July 2004, & finish in April 2007. The total budget: € 1.377.272,00 ERDF funding : € 843.654,00 National funding: € 533.618,00

  19. Budget and duration Budget for each component 1- Overall Management and co-ordination:Province of Fryslân € 290.000 (21 %) 2- Landfill and reuse: Waste Disposal Company Halle-Lochau € 300.000 (21,7%) 3- Separate collection: LAG Appennino Genovese € 457.000 (33,2%) 4- Organisation structure of Waste Management: Recycling Institute Edinburgh. € 330.000 (33,2%) The total budget: € 1.377.272,00 ERDF funding : € 843.654,00 National funding: € 533.618,00

  20. CHANCES/CHALLANGES EUROPEAN POLICY/RULES DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS INTERREG IV

  21. EUROPEAN POLICY/RULES • EU RULES LANDFILL DIRECTIVE • LANDFILL BAN (FOR RECYCLING WASTE) • TAX LANDFILLING

  22. COHESION REPORT • Is 34% of EU budget • About 50-50 between current and new Member States • More than ¾ of the budget for regions and Member States lagging behind in development • important subjects • innovation and the knowledge society • environment and risk prevention

  23. Skien/Porsgrunn Göteborg Stockton - on - Tees/ Middlesbrough Odense Malmö Leeuwarden Emden Sneek Norwich

  24. COHESION REPORT EU (February 2004) • presents proposals for reformed cohesion policy after 2007 • EU budget 2000-2006 € 108.5 billion PER YEAR for EU25, € 37 billion for structural actions • Financial Perspectives 2007-2013€ 146.4 billion PER YEAR for EU27, € 48 billion for structural actions

  25. Water City International – City of Leeuwarden WCI-I WCI-II investments now Euro 150.000 2.2 miljoen 17 miljoen the snowball-effect

  26. INTERREG III C EWM • FINISHED APRIL 2007 RESULTS • FEASIBILITY STUDIES • PLANS INNOVATIVE ACTION & PILOTS INTERREG IV • PREPARATION OF PROJECTS 2007 • APPLICATION ROUND starts 1/1/2008

  27. UNITED WE SOLVE WASTE PROBLEMS

More Related