1 / 14

Semi-Empirical Mass Formula part I Classical Terms

Semi-Empirical Mass Formula part I Classical Terms. [Sec. 4.2 Dunlap]. THE FAMOUS B/A (binding energy per nucleon) CURVE. The Semi-Empirical Mass Formula is sometimes referred to as:. The Bethe – Weizsacher Mass Formula. Or just “The Mass Formula”. Hans Bethe (1906 -2005).

cili
Download Presentation

Semi-Empirical Mass Formula part I Classical Terms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Semi-Empirical Mass Formulapart IClassical Terms [Sec. 4.2 Dunlap]

  2. THE FAMOUS B/A (binding energy per nucleon) CURVE

  3. The Semi-Empirical Mass Formula is sometimes referred to as: The Bethe – Weizsacher Mass Formula Or just “The Mass Formula” Hans Bethe (1906 -2005) Carl F. von Weisächer (1912 -2007) Both interested in production of energy inside stars – both involved in A-bomb

  4. The SEMF Lets take a look at it: [Eq. 4.12] Where are constant/parameters found empirically We see an expected general form of: =Mass constituents – [Binding Energy/c2] where is the binding energy of the nucleus – given by:

  5. The SEMF gives the form for B/A A In terms of different components. Volume Surface Coulomb Asymmetry Pairing = Volume E – Surface E – Coulomb E – Asymmetry E – Pairing E

  6. The Volume Term To the first approximation the nucleus can be considered as a LIQUID made up of nucleons (neutrons and protons). In a molecular classical liquid one has to put in LATENT HEAT (L) per kg of liquid evaporated. Why? Because each molecule has to break the same number of molecular bonds on leaving the liquid. It needs energy q (eV) – depending only on nearest neighbor bonds The energy for removing A molecules is:

  7. The Volume Term What is the latent heat for a nucleon? Like a molecule in a liquid – the nucleon is only bound by nearest neighbors because the STRONG FORCE is a SHORT RANGE interaction. An approximate treatment takes there to be 12 nearest neighbors. If each bond has U (MeV) of B.E. then the total amount of B.E. is 6U (MeV) – Not 12 because we must not double count. U=2.6MeV per bond

  8. The Surface Term • If we say that the total B.E. of the nucleus is aVA then we make an ERROR • The bonding of nucleons on surface is ~50% less than those in the bulk • The density of nucleons in the “skin thickness” is ~50% less [remember electron scattering findings] q R Number of nucleons in R = where Let the number of bonds for a surface nucleon be only 6 (not 12) – B.E = 3U Taking U=2.6MeV, R0=1.2F, R=2.4F, aS=9U=23MeV. . …EXPERIMENTAL VALUE = 18MeV

  9. Adding the Surface Term So far with volume and surface term we have: NOTE: This same expression would apply to a molecular liquid drop The way to maximize the binding of a liquid drop is to minimize the surface area - that is why liquid drops tend to be SPHERICAL NOTE: So far the binding energy depends only on the number of nucleons and not on the charge Z.

  10. The Coulomb Term This term gives the contribution to the energy of the nucleus due to the potential energy of PROTONS in the nucleus This in ELECTROSTATIC energy – originating form the EM FORCE - It is a NEGATIVE B.E. because its effect is to give out energy. Lets assume that the mean distance between two nucleons in the nucleus is 5 F, then how much electrostatic energy is involved. But some protons are much closer ~ 2F V(2F) = 0.7 MeV

  11. The Coulomb Term So how can we estimate the Coulomb energy for a nucleus We can assume that in the first approximation the nucleus has a UNIFORM density of PROTONS out to radius R. The we perform an electrostatics thought experiment where we bring up small charge dq from infinity to fill up the shell between r and r+dr Infinity R Q The amount of charge we are “pushing against” is

  12. The Coulomb Term Infinity R Q Small work done =

  13. The Coulomb Term Infinity R Now we are ready to build the whole nucleus from r=0 to r=R

  14. Inclusion of the Coulomb Term Which is very close to the experimental value NOTE: Left like this the nucleus would tend to become totally neutrons – NO PROTONS.

More Related