1 / 12

Corneal Biomechanical Assessment using Dynamic Ultra High-Speed Scheimpflug Technology Non-Contact Tonometry (UHS-

Corneal Biomechanical Assessment using Dynamic Ultra High-Speed Scheimpflug Technology Non-Contact Tonometry (UHS-ST NCT): Preliminary Results. Renato Ambrósio Jr., MD, PhD* Diogo L. Caldas, MD Isaac C. Ramos, MD Rodrigo T. Santos, MD Leonardo N. Pimentel, MD Cynthia Roberts, PhD*

cicily
Download Presentation

Corneal Biomechanical Assessment using Dynamic Ultra High-Speed Scheimpflug Technology Non-Contact Tonometry (UHS-

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Corneal Biomechanical Assessment using Dynamic Ultra High-Speed Scheimpflug Technology Non-Contact Tonometry (UHS-ST NCT): Preliminary Results Renato Ambrósio Jr., MD, PhD* Diogo L. Caldas, MD Isaac C. Ramos, MD Rodrigo T. Santos, MD Leonardo N. Pimentel, MD Cynthia Roberts, PhD* Michael W. Belin, MD* Dr. Ambrósio & Dr. Belin are consultants for Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH (Wetzlar, Germany) and have received research funding and travel reimbursements

  2. Introduction: Evolution on Corneal Propedeutics • “Propedeutics” refers (in Medicine) to the collection of data about a patient by observations and examinations. • Advances are recognized on the ability for architecture or goemetrical characterization of the cornea • Keratometry, Keratoscopy, Videokeratography, Corneal Topography, Corneal Tomography

  3. Corneal Biomechanics: Relevance • From Geometrical and Optical understanding, the next step is biological evaluation: healing response and biomechanics • Ectasia mysteries* in Refractive Surgery had highlight the need for corneal biomechanical understanding • (*ie: cases with no risk factors that develop ectasia after LASIK) • Also to Customize Refractive Corneal Treatments; correctly measure IOP (intraocular pressure) and to possibly predict glaucoma risk • Corneal biomechanical evaluations were limited to in vitro studies and to mathematical finite element models until the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA-Reichert, Depew) in 2005 • New techniques are under development for evaluating biomechanics • This e-Poster presents a new system – The Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) with preliminary clinical results.

  4. The Oculus Corvis ST • Ultra High-Speed (UHS ST) Scheimpflug Technology takes 4,330 frames/sec with 8mm horizontal coverage • Monitors corneal deformation response to a symmetrically metered air pulse 1. Natural; (Ingoing Phase) 2. First Applanation (1st A) Momentum; 3 and 4. Ingoing Concavity Phase; 5. Highest Concavity Momentum; 6. Oscillation Period; (Outgoing Phase); 7. Second Applanation (2nd A) Momentum; 8. After Second Applanation; 9. Natural Back 1st Applanation, Highest Concavity and 2nd Applanation: Time and Length; Maximum Deformation; Maximum Velocity In and Out; Thickness

  5. Corvis ST: First Studies • Experiment involving contact lenses mounted on an artifical pressurized chamber (Caldas et al., ePoster ASCRS 2011) found that the deformation response is influenced by lens properties and chamber pressure. • The inspection of the actual deformation process details corneal characterization, which has a potential for distinguishing normal (A, B) and keratoconus (C, D) corneas (see video* PosterASCRS2011_clip_RAmbrosio). Natural and Highest Deformation Momentum in a Normal (A, B) and a Keratoconic (C, D) Cornea

  6. Corvis ST: Clinical Parameters • IOP: is the NCT measurement based on the 1st Applanation • 1st A-time: is the time from starting • until the first applanation • HC-time: time from starting until • Highest Concavity is reached • 2nd A-time: time from starting • until the second applanation • 1st A length: cord length of the first applanation • 2nd A length: cord length of the second applanation • Def Amp: maximum amplitude at the apex (highest concavity) • W-Dist: distance of the two “knee’s” at highest concavity (HC) • Curvature Rad HC: central concave curvature at HC • Curvature Rad normal: initial central convex curvature • Vin: corneal speed during the first applanation moment • Vout: corneal speed during the second applanation moment

  7. Clinical Study • The Corvis ST was utilized to assess corneal deformation response in one eye from 71 keratoconic patients and in one eye from 178 normal patients. • Clinical diagnosis was based on the complete eye exam, Placido-disk based corneal topography and Pentacam Corneal Tomography. • Statistically significant distributions for all parameters (Mann-Whitney, p<0.05), but with significant overlap and AUC • (area under the ROC curves) between 0.673 and 0.852

  8. Corvis Combo1: combined parameter • Joint work with “Instituto de Computação” at UFAL (Universidade Federal de Alagoas*) to develop a combined parameter (Corvis Combo1) based on a linear regression analysis, considering the effects of IOP on deformation response parameters • 0.033 * IOP - 0.004 * Pachy Apex - 0.448 * 1st A Time - 0.049 * HC Time + 0.093 * 2nd A Time + 0.026 * 1st A Length(max) - 0.105 * 2nd A Length(max) + 0.208 * Def Amp (max) - 0.619 * W-Dist - 0.021 * Curv, Rad, HC - 0.101 * Curv, Rad, Normal - 0.525 * Vin - 0.166 * Vout + 7.952 * Prof. Aydano P. Machado & J. M. Lyra, MD, PhD

  9. Clinical Study • The Corvis ST Combo1 performed statistically better (p<0.05; Pairwise ROC comparisons) than the individual parameters from the Corvis ST to distinguish 71 keratoconic eyes and 178 normal eyes (one eye per patient included) • This approach has been complementary to enhance the diagnosis of ectasia susceptibility.

  10. Clinical Correlations • There were very significant correlations (Spearman, p<0.001) between IOP and 1st Applanation Time (rho=0.94), 2nd Applanation Time (rho=-0.73), Deformation Amplitude (rho=-0.80), W-Dist (rho=-0.66), Curv Rad HC (rho=0.45), Vin (rho=-0.49), Vout (0.38) and Combo1 (rho=-0.44) • There were significant correlations (Spearman, p<0.01) between Pachymetry at the Apex and IOP (rho=0.37), 1st Applanation Time (rho=0.4) and Lengh (rho=-0.18 ), W-Dist (rho=-0.25), Curv Rad HC (rho=0.48), Vout (rho=0.3), and Combo1 (rho=-0.64) • There was a positive correlation between age and HC Time (Spearman, p=0.0039; rho=0.22)

  11. Enhanced Screening for Ectasia Susceptibility • Biomechanical data from Corvis ST enhances the capability to detect very mild cases of ectasia and also help to characterize stable cases with asymmetric bow tie and inferior steepening (ABT/IS). • 26 eyes diagnosed as FormeFruste Keratoconus (FFKC), with normal front curvature map while the fellow eye has keratoconus were examined. • 25 eyes with ABT/IS but with no other clinical or tomographic sign of ectasia were examined. • Combo1 • 24/178 (13%) normal eyes >0.21 • 9/71 (13%) keratoconic eyes <0.21 • 21/26 (80%) eyes with FFKC >0.21 • 8/25 (32%) ABT/IS cases >0.21 Kruskall-Wallis Test see video* PosterASCRS2011_clip_RAmbrosio

  12. Corvis ST: Conclusions • The inspection of corneal deformation during NCT enables biomechanical characterization • The deformation is severely influenced by IOP • Combo1 from Corvis ST provides clinically relevant parameter to enhance sensitivity and specificity to detect ectasia. • This approach is complementary to Corneal Tomography with the Pentacam for screening refractive candidates ABT with no Ectasia (A,B) x FFKC (C, D) Combo 1=0.16 Combo 1=0.31

More Related