1 / 15

Psychology of Music Learning

Psychology of Music Learning. Miksza ANXIETY. Kemp (1996). Many constructs/phenomena have been studied in relation to musician anxiety Personality, behavioral, cognitive, therapies, treatments Most commonly cited personality variable in music research. Kemp (1996). Trait vs. State

Download Presentation

Psychology of Music Learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Psychology of Music Learning Miksza ANXIETY

  2. Kemp (1996) • Many constructs/phenomena have been studied in relation to musician anxiety • Personality, behavioral, cognitive, therapies, treatments • Most commonly cited personality variable in music research

  3. Kemp (1996) • Trait vs. State • General disposition vs. response to particular situations • Are musicians pre-disposed to being anxious or are they more prone to fluctuations generated by the various situations in which they find themselves, and the demands made upon them • The two interact… • Spielberger STAI (1970) • Common measure in the field… • Cattell Second order factors • Generally considered trait, some interact more than others with state anxiety…

  4. Kemp (1996) • Cattell factors… • Second order factors • Low ego strength (vs. high) • *Shyness (vs. adventurousness) • Suspiciousness (vs. trusting) • *Guilt proneness (vs. self-assured) • Low self-sentiment (vs. high self-sentiment) • *High ergic tension (vs. low tension) • See boxes on page 88,89, and 90

  5. Kemp (1996) • Cattell ‘Anxiety’ factor nearly equivalent to Eysenck’s ‘Neuroticism’ factor • “...someone who is easily perturbed, worrying, emotional when frustrated, lax, uncontrolled, depressed, moody, hypochondriacal, shy, embitered, and of restricted interest.”

  6. Kemp (1996) • Interesting results when studying British school children and musician populations • Those in a specialist music school showing a profile of anxiety factors…. (Kemp, 1981) • Not clear whether due to environment or not (e.g., the ‘hot house’ effect) • Those in conservatory training definitely exhibiting an anxiety profile (see Table 5.1)

  7. Kemp (1996) • Convincing results with pro’s too… • Watson & Valentine (1987) • Higher on trait than in printed norms • Correlations between the two and music performance anxiety measure • Correlations with amount of professional experience • Natural tendency or dropout issues… ? • Steptoe (1989) • Professional elements beyond performance contributing to stress • Family separation, irregular hours, travel, rehearsal monotony • Quenk (1993) • Personality shifts in stressed situations • Those who are usually relatively introverted tend to begin to over-organize, over-analyze, behave obsessively, and perceive themselves as incompetent

  8. Kemp (1996) • Facilitating vs. Debilitating • Yerkes-Dodson inverted-U, optimal arousal model • Hamann & Sobaje (1983) [see actual article on reserve) • Psyching up, optimal levels, heightened sensitivity and imagination • Also interacts with level of preparation and task mastery • Anger manifests as a defense mechanism - perhaps due to low ego strength

  9. Kemp (1996) • Arousal • Many personality theories have roots in biological processes • Arousal in this case refers to the processing that the autonomic nervous system deals with • Gut feeling responses (e.g., fight or flight) that then signal higher cortical responses • Some suggest that introverts (e.g., musicians) reach higher levels of arousal quicker - more likely to suffer negative effects of over-stimulation • Symptoms - shaking, sweating, heart-rate, nausea

  10. Kemp (1996) • Self-concept • Musicians’ personal identity and personal worth wrapped up heavily with performance ability • Two patterns of behavior likely • Prima Donna behavior and intense competition, perceived positive trajectory • Heightened apprehension, self-criticism, feelings of incompetence, progressively debilitating anxiety, loss of self-worth • Musicians induce their own stress by setting high standards for themselves • Search for perfection tied to first-born status?

  11. Kemp (1996) • Catastrophizing • Fear of a ‘point of no return’ that leads to disintegration of performance • Steptoe & Fidler (1987) • Students, pros, and amateurs all imagine catastrophe scenarios • Seems mostly related to state anxiety • Related to compound effects of worrying and worrying about anxiety • Is off-task behavior, leads to lack of attention, a shift from actual concerns to self-conscious worry about physical and mental state

  12. LeBlanc (1994) • A theoretical model of performance anxiety • Highlight variables that may be of impact • Moves from preparation to commitment to perform, to presentation, to feedback • In the context of solo performance • Hierarchically organized to reflect passage of time • Citations for variables included in the model

  13. LeBlanc (1994) • General levels (4 broad rather than 11 detailed) • Background, preparation • Mood/affect, Environmental factors, Self-perception • Arousal, attention in the moment • Feedback • See model on page 61 for detailed breakdown… • See descriptions of each component on pages 60 - 66 for detailed implications…

  14. Hamann & Sobaje (1983) • The effect of debilitating vs. facilitating anxiety conditions on music performance • Speilberger STAI and STPI • 60 UNC Greely students • Conditions (in order for all?) • Low-anxiety - alone with a tape recorder • High-anxiety - jury condition with faculty • Administered self-report measures in between • Subjects grouped by… • Anxiety scores, curiosity, anger, experience • High, medium low groupings

  15. Hamann & Sobaje (1983) • Results • Differences by treatment on anxiety and anger - but not curiosity • More of each in high anxiety condition • Interaction of state/trait by condition (figure 1) • Those high in trait had higher anger scores in high anxiety condition • Interaction of yrs. formal study by condition (figure 2) • Those with a good deal of formal training had better performance scores in high anxiety condition, those with moderate formal training had better performance scores in low anxiety condition

More Related