1 / 17

REACH BC+ R etention and E nrollment to A chieve C hildren’s H ealth and B uild C apacity

REACH BC+ R etention and E nrollment to A chieve C hildren’s H ealth and B uild C apacity. Colorado All Kids Covered School Enrollment Forum March 12, 2010. Wisconsin’s Uninsured Population. Leading the country (good and bad)

cian
Download Presentation

REACH BC+ R etention and E nrollment to A chieve C hildren’s H ealth and B uild C apacity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. REACH BC+Retention and Enrollment to Achieve Children’s Health and Build Capacity Colorado All Kids Covered School Enrollment Forum March 12, 2010

  2. Wisconsin’s Uninsured Population • Leading the country (good and bad) • 83,000 children (7 percent) were uninsured for all or part of 2008 • Among all residents, 9% of whites lacked coverage at least part of the year, compared to 20% of blacks and 34% of Hispanic/Latinos. • Among kids, the percentages are 5 for whites and 13 for blacks • Rural – 45 out of 72 counties are considered rural; 2 times more likely to be uninsured than non-Milwaukee urban counterparts

  3. REACH BC+ Goals • Help schools act on their goals of improving the overall well-being of children • Enable children to do well in school by removing barriers to health care access and thereby improving health outcomes among Wisconsin’s school children • Increase enrollment in BadgerCare+ • Engage and involve schools in promoting BadgerCare+ • Identify and reach students in need of health insurance • Establish outreach strategies and enrollment processes that all schools can adapt and use

  4. Why schools? • Families trust schools and may prefer learning about and pursuing health insurance options through more familiar environments • First point of contact/semi-captive audience • Statewide reach • If successful, would provide an institutionalized process for ongoing work • School personnel and families concerned about health

  5. Why this project, why now • Awareness among eligible families remains incomplete and there are newly eligible families all the time • Many other barriers for this population • Perceptions (income too high, insurance unnecessary) • Complicated family lives with competing priorities • Programmatic complexities (paperwork requirements, difficult to navigate alone) • Language difficulties and cultural beliefs • Information campaigns alone may not be enough

  6. Free/Reduced Price Lunch Population Students Without Health Insurance Entire Student Population FRPL Estimated Eligible Zeroing in on those in need

  7. Data Sharing: Free and Reduced Price Meals • Why coordinate? • Often identical income requirements • Willingness/ability to enroll in a public benefit program • Data suggest that 17% of those enrolled in school meal programs are uninsured and eligible for MA/SCHIP • USDA guidelines allow: • Allows sharing of information between free and reduced price meal programs and state Medicaid and SCHIP programs (does your organization qualify?) • Must offer families the opportunity to request information NOT be shared (opt out) • FRPL “determining agency” and MA/SCHIP agency must enter into a DSA

  8. Data Sharing: Health Insurance Status • School Districts may collect student health insurance status • School Districts may share health insurance status only when parents/guardians give active consent • The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) requires the following elements be included for active consent: • Name of student whose record is being released • Specify records that may be disclosed • State the purpose of the disclosure • Identify the party to whom disclosure will be made, and • Include the signature of the parent/guardian

  9. Data Sharing - Key Questions • How best to target: FRPL, HIS, both or neither? • If FRPL: • Are you considered “central to the administration of MA/SCHIP”? If not, will your state designate you as such? • Does the school district already include an “Opt-Out” question or form in its FRPL enrollment process? What, if anything, is done with that information? • What is the FRPL enrollment process? What is the school enrollment process? • If HIS • Does the district gather health insurance status from students? If not, is it willing to collect it? • How will the district obtain informed consent to share the data? • What are the timelines and deadlines for preparing these materials and forms? • What is the capacity within and without the district to provide outreach and enrollment assistance?

  10. Data Sharing: Challenges to expect, tools you can use • Challenges • Keeping it legal • Easing privacy concerns • Navigating the schools’ process(es) • Capacity, yours and theirs • Tools • CHILD Benchmark Moments • FRPL Opt-out samples • HIS collection forms • DSAs • Outreach materials

  11. Outreach Strategies • Basics • Use knowledge gained from previous efforts • Strategies may differ across school communities • School District input is crucial • Many levels of possible outreach • General outreach about BadgerCare Plus • Targeted outreach to free and reduced price meal recipients and uninsured families • Personal contact with uninsured families and/or those who request personal assistance

  12. Making School Partnerships Work 1. Assess local capacities and level of interest • What are you already doing that could be adapted to include health insurance outreach and/or enrollment assistance? • Who is there to help? Challenges: • Identifying and connecting with the right people • Navigating existing (and highly variable!) school systems

  13. Making School Partnerships Work 2. Enlist & Cultivate local partners • Make/re-affirm local connections • Provide training for MA/SCHIP enrollment Challenges: • Fostering “buy-in” • Keeping expectations realistic • Need for on-going technical assistance

  14. Making School Partnerships Work 3. Determine outreach strategies • Select and adapt materials for student population • Strategies differ through targeting specific populations, and by level of intensity of personal contact Challenges: • Choosing strategies that complement existing activities • Data sharing agreements and data sharing itself can be time intensive and complex processes

  15. Making School Partnerships Work 4. Implement outreach strategies Challenges: • Time & Energy • Following through beyond providing information 5. Assess, evaluate, modify, assess, evaluate… Challenges: • Isolating the effects of outreach efforts on changes in knowledge, attitudes, or coverage

  16. Big Demand, Early Success Pupil services staff and directors: • 66% said “Yes” that their school provides BC+ assistance • 52% said their BC+ knowledge “Not good” 45% said “good” and 3% said “Not good” • 83% would like to increase their BC+ knowledge School staff in CHILD Districts • 79% said BC+ knowledge has improved • 46% said definitely, 33% mostly yes when asked if BC+ assistance a role for schools • 50% said yes and 33% said conditionally yes when asked if they would continue BC+ outreach when CHILD ended

  17. CKF-WI as a Resource We created a toolbox to provide professionals with resources they need to identify and assist the uninsured children and adults with whom they interact every day. www.ckfwi.org/Pages/3toolboxhome.html (608) 261-1455 Michael Jacob, mbjacob@wisc.edu Erin Mader, emader@wisc.edu

More Related