1 / 13

Induction and Deduction

Induction and Deduction. Inductive Reasoning. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence. You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion about things you haven’t seen or heard

chione
Download Presentation

Induction and Deduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Induction and Deduction

  2. Inductive Reasoning • Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence. • You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion about things you haven’t seen or heard • The intellectual movement from limited facts (a sample) to a general conviction is called an inductive leap

  3. Inductive reasoning cont’d • For a claim to be credible the sample must be: 1.Known 2.Suffiecient 3. representative

  4. Is the sample known?

  5. Is the sample sufficient?

  6. Is the sample representative?

  7. Occam’s Razor • Occam’s Razor: the maxim that when a body of evidence exists, the simplest conclusion that expresses all of it is probably the best. • Maxim: 1. a general truth, fundamental principle, or rule of conduct

  8. Deduction

  9. Deduction • Opposite of induction • Deduction moves from a general truth to a specific example • Vehicle of deduction is the syllogism

  10. Syllogism • This is an argument that takes 2 existing truths(premise) and puts them together to create a new truth • Classic Example: • MAJOR PREMISE: All men are mortal • MINOR PREMISE: Socrates is a man • CONCLUSION: Socrates is mortal

  11. Conditions of a Reliable deductive argument • The premises must be true • The terms must be unambiguous • The syllogistic form must be valid

  12. Major and Minor premises • Premises in a syllogism must be true • Major premise is derived from induction • Minor premise is derived from using the 5 senses (taste, touch, hear, smell, see)

  13. Syllogism language • The terms of a deductive argument must be clear and consistent • If definitions change within a syllogism, arguments can become fallacious

More Related