430 likes | 819 Views
2. Outline. IntroductionRouting ProblemsMotivation Research ObjectivesLiterature ReviewSolution MethodsMethodologiesThe Mathematical Formulation of the MDVRPThe Electromagnetism-like Mechanism Illustrated Examples
E N D
1. 1 Talk at
Department of Industrial Engineering & Management,I-Shou University.
July. 21, 2006
B.Y. Huang
Committees: Dr. Chin-Shiuh Shieh & Dr. Nai-Chie Wei
Research Advisers: Dr. Peitsang Wu & Dr. I-Ming Chao An Electromagnetism-like Mechanism for Solving the Multiple Depot Vehicle Routing Problem My background
PhD UiO in reactive factory scheduling
Stay at Robotics Institute CMU, Steve Smith, Mark Fox, Norman Sadeh
Worked with contract research at SINTEF/SI for > 20 years
My background
PhD UiO in reactive factory scheduling
Stay at Robotics Institute CMU, Steve Smith, Mark Fox, Norman Sadeh
Worked with contract research at SINTEF/SI for > 20 years
2. 2 Outline Introduction
Routing Problems
Motivation
Research Objectives
Literature Review
Solution Methods
Methodologies
The Mathematical Formulation of the MDVRP
The Electromagnetism-like Mechanism
Illustrated Examples & Analyses
Conclusions & Future Research
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5 Traveling Salesman Problem
6. 6 Vehicle Routing Problem
7. 7 Multiple Depot VRP
8. 8 Motivation
Exciting Problem
Practical Applications
Industrial Relevance
Importance to Society
9. 9 Research Objectives Objectives
Solve the MDVRP
Good performance & be investigated
Tool
The EM algorithm
Execution
C++ program language
10. 10 Research Scope and Restrictions Network
non-directional and symmetrical network
corresponding to Euclidian Space
Depot
limitless volume of stock
needless to consider the vehicle loading time
Customer
demand quantity, place coordinate, and merchandise categories, etc., are all already known and fixed
Vehicle
needless to consider driving speed, drivers state
limited carries capacity
11. 11 Thesis Architecture
12. 12 Literature Review The MDVRP is NP-hard (Lenstra et al, 1981)
Current Methods in VRP
Exact Methods
Dynamic Programming
Langrangean relaxation
Branch & bound
Approximate Algorithms and Heuristics
Savings Algorithm (Clarke and Wright, 1964)
Route first, cluster second ; Cluster first, route second
Tabu search
Genetic algorithm
Simulated annealing
Threshold accepting, etc.
13. 13 Solution Methods for MDVRP Exact Procedure
Branch and bound
Laporte et al. (1984) customers ? 50; depots ? 8
Laporte et al. (1988) customers ? 80; depots ? 3
14. 14 Solution Methods for MDVRP Heuristic Algorithms
Savings Algorithm
Tillman (1971)
Two-Phase-Approaches
Wren and Holliday (1972) applied “cluster first, route second” way for two depots and up to 176 cities
Raft (1982) introduced 2-opt exchange procedure
Chao et al. (1993) used the "record-to-record"
Giosa et al. (1999) described the “Assignment Algorithms”
Meta-Heuristic Algorithms
Renaudl et al. (1994) introduced the tabu search heuristic
15. 15 The Mathematical Formulation of the MDVRP
16. 16
17. 17 Birbil and Fang (2003) constructed a mechanism that likes the attraction-repulsion mechanism of the electromagnetism theory.
Chiang (2005) used the EM to solve the traveling salesman problem (TSP) and the results corresponded to his expected
Yu (2005) in his thesis described the EM could suitable for the “Object Sequencing” and “Grouping Problems”
Electromagnetism-like Mechanism
18. 18 Electromagnetism-like Mechanism General Scheme
19. 19 General Scheme Initialize
20. 20 General Scheme Local search
21. 21 General Scheme Total force calculation
22. 22 General Scheme Move along the total force
23. 23 The Activity-List (AL)
The Random-Key (RK)
The EM for MDVRP
24. 24 An AL form of the EM algorithm
25. 25 The three types of the EM algorithms The prototype EM Algorithm: the original type of the EM algorithm;
The improved EM Algorithm: add a swap mechanism (The 2-Opt method) to the EM algorithm;
The intensification EM Algorithm: construct initial solutions for the improved EM algorithm.
26. 26 Characteristics of test problems
27. 27 Parameters of the EM Algorithm
28. 28 The Prototype EM Algorithm
29. 29 Results in the Prototype EM algorithm
30. 30
31. 31 The Improved EM Algorithm
32. 32 Results in the Improved EM Algorithm
33. 33
34. 34 The Intensification EM Algorithm
35. 35 Results in the Intensification EM Algorithm
36. 36
37. 37 Summary of computational results
38. 38 Summary of computational results
39. 39 Summary of computational results
40. 40 Conclusions
In our researches, The improved EM algorithm is better than the original (prototype) EM algorithm. When the improved EM algorithm accedes to the initial solutions construction method, we can improve the results.
The EM algorithm is possible to solve the MDVRP because the transportation cost is close to the best known cost.
41. 41 Future Researches Combine other meta-heuristic algorithms with the EM algorithm, the performance of the new integration may be better.
Apply other local search methods to improve the efficiency of the EM algorithm might produce better results and spend less time.
42. 42 Future Researches We can apply this method for other problems, e.g., the VRP, and VRPTW, have not be solved by this new meta-heuristic algorithm.
Combine other meta-heuristic algorithms with the EM algorithm, the performance of the new integration may be better.
43. 43