1 / 16

“Effect of Genre, Speaker, and Word Class on the Realization of Given and New Information”

Interspeech 2006 - Pittsburgh, PA. “Effect of Genre, Speaker, and Word Class on the Realization of Given and New Information”. Agust ín Gravano & Julia Hirschberg {agus, julia}@cs.columbia.edu. Spoken Language Processing Group Columbia University. Motivation.

cheng
Download Presentation

“Effect of Genre, Speaker, and Word Class on the Realization of Given and New Information”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Interspeech 2006 - Pittsburgh, PA “Effect of Genre, Speaker, and Word Classon the Realization of Given and New Information” Agustín Gravano & Julia Hirschberg {agus, julia}@cs.columbia.edu Spoken Language Processing Group Columbia University

  2. Motivation • Speakers of American English tend to: • accent references to “new” information, and • deaccent references to “old” (or “given”) information. (Chafe 1974, Prince 1981 & 1992, inter alia) • Variation of prominence in “given” entities is strongly affected by the persistence of: • grammatical function (subject, object, etc.) and • position in the sentence. (Terken & Hirschberg, 1994) Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  3. Motivation • Possible applications: • Improve naturalness of TTS systems. • Aid ASR. • Questions: • What are other sources of variation? • What is the effect of: • speaker? • genre? • word class? Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  4. Main Results • Speakers vary the manner in which they realize differences in information status. • Speakers tend to produce “given” verbs with higher intensity than “new” verbs, both in read and spontaneous speech. Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  5. Overview • Materials and Methods • Corpus • Information status • Word classes • Features • Results • Nouns • Verbs • Discussion • Conclusions Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  6. Boston Directions Corpus • Hirschberg & Nakatani 1996 • Spontaneous and read monologues. • 9 increasingly complex direction-giving tasks: • Describe how to get to MIT from Harvard. • Method: • Spontaneous speech recorded and transcribed. • Speakers returned and read. • 4 speakers (3 male, 1 female). Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  7. Boston Directions Corpus • Mean length of tasks: • Spontaneous: 111s • Read: 84s • Excerpt from the spontaneous part of the corpus: first # enter the Harvard Square T stop # and buy a token # then proceed to get on the # Inbound um Red Line # uh subway [...] • Corpus size: • Spontaneous: ~66m • Read: ~50m • Prosody labeled using the ToBI convention. Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  8. Information Status • Prince 1981: • Entities are new when first introduced in the discourse. • Evoked entities are given. They are already in the discourse. • Simple definition: • A word w is given if in the current task there is at least one previous occurrence of a word with the same stem. • Otherwise, we say that w is new. Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  9. Word Classes • Automatically labeled the part-of-speech of all the words in the corpus using the Brill Tagger. • Categorized words into: • Nouns • Verbs • Adjectives • Adverbs • Others • Significant results only for Nouns and Verbs. Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  10. Features • Word acoustic features, extracted using Praat: • Max, mean, min pitch • Max, mean, min intensity • Pitch and intensity features were also normalized with respect to the mean value of: • ± 1 second around the target word, • ± 5 words around the target word, • the target word’s Intermediate Phrase. • Pause before and after the word. Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  11. Results: Nouns n = mean value for the new words is significantly largerthan for the given words g = mean value for the given words is significantly larger than for the new words Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  12. Results: Verbs n = mean value for the new words is significantly largerthan for the given words g = mean value for the given words is significantly larger than for the new words Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  13. Discussion: Variation of intensity in verbs • Examples: you get out of the T stop # you cross Massachusetts Avenue [...] you wanna cross Mass Ave opposite that # there's usually a bunch of cabs and and people standing around there # so # then once you've crossed it you're you're in Harvard Yard proper then you're right at the entrance to what is called the Infinite Corridor # and it's called the Infinite Corridor because it's this really long # place you can walk entirely indoors • Direct objects of ‘cross’ and ‘call’ are either deaccented or pronominalized in the second and third mentions. • With no other salient accented items in their phrases, the given mentions of these verbs are more prominent. Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  14. Discussion: Variation of intensity in verbs • Example: so you're going to have to transfer # you transfer by going to Government Center which is inbound • The increased intensity of the second mention of ‘transfer’ might be due to the change in its verb form. • Similar to Terken & Hirschberg, 1994: • Given nouns tend to be accented if they represent a different grammatical function from the first mention. Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  15. Conclusions and Future Work • Evidence of: • Speaker variation in the way they realize differences in information status. • Given verbs tend to be produced with a greater intensity than new verbs. • Nouns and verbs behave very differently. • Only preliminary results: more work needed. • Future Work: • Repeat and deepen these analyses on larger corpora of read and spontaneous speech, and in conversation. Agustín Gravano Interspeech 2006

  16. Interspeech 2006 - Pittsburgh, PA “Effect of Genre, Speaker, and Word Classon the Realization of Given and New Information” Agustín Gravano & Julia Hirschberg {agus, julia}@cs.columbia.edu Spoken Language Processing Group Columbia University

More Related