650 likes | 912 Views
Treatment of the Common Cold with Echinacea. Christopher Theberge. Outline. Introduction Background Negative Echinacea Findings Positive Echinacea Findings Future Research Recommendations. Introduction. 2002 herbal-supplement sales of $4.28 billion dollars
E N D
Treatment of the Common Cold with Echinacea Christopher Theberge
Outline • Introduction • Background • Negative Echinacea Findings • Positive Echinacea Findings • Future Research Recommendations
Introduction • 2002 herbal-supplement sales of $4.28 billion dollars • Echinacea was 3rd leading supplement sold • Grossed $188 million in sales • “Immune system boosting” function
History • Plains Indians’ therapy for treatment of • Colds • Respiratory tract infections • Sore throats • Topically for burns and snakebites (Hobbs, C (1994) HerbalGram, 30, 33-47; Percival, SS (2000) Biochemical Pharmacology, 60, 155-158)
History • Plains Indians introduced it to European settlers • 1920’s in National Formulary • Interest dwindled with advent of anti-biotics • Brought to Europe where heavily studied • Gerhard Madaus early 1900’s • First to report pharmacological activity • Pharmaceutically prepared Echinacin® (Borchers et al (2000) The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72, 339-347)
Echinacea • Coneflower • Spiny flower heads, and cone-like receptacle • Greek for “echinos” meaning hedgehog • Part of the Native American Daisy Family (Hobbs, C (1994) HerbalGram, 30, 33-47)
Echinacea • Genus includes 9 species in US and Canada • Three primary species used medicinally • Echinacea purpurea (E. purpurea) • Echinacea angustifolia (E. angustifolia) • Echinacea pallida (E. pallida) (Borchers et al (2000) The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72, 339-347)
Echinacea • Most common forms taken include • Liquid extracts • Fresh juice of E. purpurea tops in ethanol • Spray or freeze-dried extracts in caps or tabs • Simple herb powders (Hobbs, C (1994) HerbalGram, 30, 33-47)
Pharmacology • Not standardized • “Active” components include • Caffeic and ferulic acid derivatives • Cichoric acid • Echinacoside • Polysaccharides • Alkylamides • Glycoproteins (Hobbs, C (1994) HerbalGram, 30, 33-47; Percival, SS (2000) Biochemical Pharmacology, 60, 155-158)
Pharmacology • The stimulation of non-specific defense capacities • Polymorphonuclear (PMN) neutrophil proliferation • Phagocytic and macrophage activity • Interferon production • Cytokine production • Anti-inflammation (Hobbs, C (1994) HerbalGram, 30, 33-47; Percival, SS (2000) Biochemical Pharmacology, 60, 155-158)
Echinacea • Three parts used medicinally • E. purpurea root and herb • Most commonly studied • E. angustifolia root • E. pallida root (Borchers et al (2000) The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72, 339-347)
Echinacea • Formulations vary by preparation • Parts from roots, herb, or both, and leaves • Either 3 echinacea species • Extraction procedures • Alcohol, pressed juice, tea • Addition of other plant extracts or herbals • Commonly adulterated with Parthenium (Borchers et al (2000) The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72, 339-347)
Echinacea • Plants vary by • Growing conditions • Harvest time • Genetics • Storage methods and conditions (Borchers et al (2000) The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72, 339-347)
Previous Research: Human Studies • Positive results include • Immune system stimulation • Reduction in cold symptom severity and duration • Prophylaxis of infection and colds • Anti-inflammation • Injectible Echinacin® • Topical • Liquid extracts (most useful?) • Oral administration with other plant extracts (Hobbs, C (1994) HerbalGram, 30, 33-47; O’Hara et al (1998) Archives of Family Medicine, 7, 523-536
Previous Research: Human Studies • The majority of research conducted in Germany • Mostly clinical reports • Few well-controlled human clinical trials • Heterogeneity of supplements (O’Hara et al (1998) Archives of Family Medicine, 7, 523-536)
Previous Research: Human Studies • Major flaws in research by improper use or description of • Diagnostic criteria • Randomization process • Treatment interventions • Methods for assessing outcomes • Blinding assurance • Detail of results • Quality statistics (O’Hara et al (1998) Archives of Family Medicine, 7, 523-536)
1992 Commission E approved only use of • Alcoholic root extracts of Echinacea pallida • Juice pressed from E. purpurea • External wounds • Upper respiratory tract infections • Urogenital infections Say: So I chose these studies (O’Hara et al (1998) Archives of Family Medicine, 7, 523-536)
Treatment of the Common Cold with Unrefined Echinacea A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Barrett et al., 2002 Annals of Internal Medicine, 137(12), 939-945
Purpose To determine if a dried, encapsulated, echinacea preparation would be efficacious towards treatment of the common cold
Methods • Designed for 150 subjects • At least 80% power to detect • 2 day duration benefit • Average 2 point reduction in cold symptoms on a 9-point severity scale • No valid measures for common cold • Considered clinically significant (Jaeschke et al (1989) Controlled Clinical Trials, 10, 407-415)
Methods: Inclusion Criteria • Registered students • Answer “Yes” to the question “Do you believe you are coming down with a cold?” • Report at least 2 of the 15 listed cold symptoms • 1 related to the respiratory tract
Methods: Exclusion Criteria • Having any of the listed symptoms > 36 hours • Using antibiotics, antihistamines, or decongestants • Specified chronic diseases • HIV • Autoimmune disease
Methods: Primary Outcomes • Defined by severity and duration of self-reported symptoms • Duration = number of days from enrollment to last day before subject answered “No” to “Do you think you are still sick today?” • Severity measured on 9-point Likert scale by “How sick do you feel today?” • Global severity measured by similar 9-point scale
Methods: Assessments • Nine point scale used to measure severity • 1 = very mild • 3 = mild • 5 = moderate • 7 = severe • 9 = extreme • Paper and electronic version of questionnaire each day • Adverse events monitored daily
Methods: Supplements Echinacea – unrefined dried preparation 25% E. purpurea root 50% E. angustifolia root Thyme Peppermint Citric Acid 25% E. purpurea herb 250 mg
Methods: Supplements • Four capsules = 1 g of echinacea • 6 g for the first 24 hours • 3 g for a maximum of 10 days • Placebo contained alfalfa
Methods: Statistical Analyses • Simple inspection • Frequency analysis • Analysis of variance (ANOVA) • 95% confidence intervals
Descriptive Statistics for Subjects Assessed (Adapted from: Barrett et al (2002) Annals of Internal Medicine, 137(12), 939-945)
Results from Echinacea Laboratory Analysis (Adapted from: Barrett et al (2002) Annals of Internal Medicine, 137(12), 939-945)
Results from Echinacea Laboratory Analysis • Lab 3 • First day dose increased tumor necrosis factor (TNF) • 189 ± 23 ng/L to 3679 ± 154 ng/L • Follow-up doses increased • 2347 ± 66 ng/L
Results • Mean onset time for first symptom 27 hours • Adherence rate of 92% from pill count • Results from blinding showed that • 49% in the echinacea group guessed correctly • 46% in the placebo group guessed correctly • P > 0.2
Results • No difference in cold duration between both groups • Trend towards longer duration in echinacea group • Durations ranged 2 to 10 days • Largest echinacea potential benefit of 0.22 days
Mean Cold Duration for Echinacea and Placebo Group 5.75 6.27 (Adapted from: Barrett et al (2002) Annals of Internal Medicine, 137(12), 939-945)
Adverse Effects 15 Subjects 22 Times Echinacea 8 Subjects 13 Times Placebo 7 Subject 9 Times • sleeplessness, heartburn, • nausea, stomachache, • upset stomach, bad taste stomachache, nausea, belching, thirst, abdominal pain with diarrhea (Adapted from: Barrett et al (2002) Annals of Internal Medicine, 137(12), 939-945)
Conclusions – Study 1 • Results do not support echinacea for treatment of the common cold • Effect size for 2 days’ duration and two points in average severity on 9-point scale not detected • No significant trends noted • All differences between groups could be explained by natural variability of the symptoms
Conclusions – Study 1 • The number of previous echinacea users represents its widespread use • This echinacea preparation appeared to be well-tolerated
Limitations – Study 1 • This study only shows that this preparation of echinacea was not effective • Preparation used not previously tested • May be ineffective because of bioavailability and phytochemical properties • Previous trials have used extracts rather than whole plant parts, and combinations with other herbs • Phytochemicals vary depending on harvest time, growing conditions, etc…
Limitations – Study 1 • Subjects studied may not benefit from echinacea • Previous trials have used older adults and those with a history of frequent colds • Echinacea may benefit only those who are immunocompromised • Smokers?
Limitations – Study 1 • No valid measurements for assessing the common cold • Self-reported assessments subject to bias • Alfalfa been shown effective in treatment of allerigic rhinitis (Mittman P. (1990). Planta Medica,56, 44-47)
Limitations – Study 1 • Modest-size trial and an effect size of 5% to 10% may be easily lost among natural variability of symptoms in type of subjects used • Subjects were studied for 10 days maximum • Frequency of longer illnesses is unknown • Five had symptoms 36 hours prior to study • Could have masked a benefit of echinacea given earlier for treatment of colds
The Efficacy of Echinacea Compound Herbal Tea Preparation on the Severity and Duration of Upper Respiratory and Flu Symptoms A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Lindenmuth, G. F. & Lindenmuth, E. B. 2000. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 6(4), 327-334
Purpose To test the efficacy of Echinacea herbal tea preparation on duration and severity of symptoms of scratchy throat, runny nose, and fever
Methods: Sample • Pennsylvania nursing home • Registered nurses, dietary aids, physicians, accountants, maintenance staff, administration • Eligibility criteria • Subjects who had early symptoms of a cold • Ineligibility criteria • Allergic to coneflowers, different flowering plants and pollens • Acute infections and being treated with antibiotics
Methods: Assignment • Randomized into echinacea or placebo group • Alternation for assignment to keep groups balanced • Echinacea group received Echinacea Plus® • Leaves, flowers, and stems of organically grown E. purpurea and E. angustifolia • Water soluble dry extract of E. purpurea • Flavor corrigents • 1.275 g of herbs and roots per tea bag
Methods: Assignment • Eater’s Digest® herbal preparation • Peppermint leaf, sweet fennel, ginger, rose hip, papaya leaf, alfalfa leaf, cinnamon • No caffeine or recognizable differences from echinacea blend • All tea bags individually sealed • 12 lb heat sealed Saran Wrap coating • 15 lb polyethylene surlyn layer
Supplement Instructions • Steep for 10 to 15 minutes in 8 fl. oz water • Drink 5 to 6 cups on first day of symptoms • Titrate to 1 cup by the fifth day
Methods: Questionnaire (Adapted from: Lindenmuth, GF & Lindenmuth, EB (2000) The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 6(4), 327-334)
Methods: Statistical Analysis • Two tailed t tests • 95% Confidence Intervals • Significance set at p < 0.05
95 subjects Mean Age = 39.7 Age range = 24 to 62 Echinacea Group 48 subjects Placebo Group 47 subjects 41 Women 7 Men 40 Women 7 Men (Adapted from: Lindenmuth, GF & Lindenmuth, EB (2000) The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 6(4), 327-334)
Results from Echinacea Plus® Phenolic Compound Analysis (Adapted from: Lindenmuth, GF & Lindenmuth, EB (2000) The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 6(4), 327-334)