340 likes | 533 Views
Overpressure Mechanisms. Possible Scenarios. Fluid volume/mass increaseExternal stress = constant. Pore volume reductionExternal stress increase. . Overpressure. Mechanisms. A) Disequilibrium Compaction. B) Fluid Expansion. Bowers, 2002- TLE. Scientific motivation. Imaging subscale features through passive and active dynamic mechanical experiments and seismic resolutionImproving forward modellingImproving imaging techniques (often the first item is driven by the second one).
E N D
1. Porous media: recovering physical properties through dynamic forward modelling Louis de Barros
Bastien Dupuy
Stéphane Garambois
Jean Virieux
3. Scientific motivation Imaging subscale features through passive and active dynamic mechanical experiments and seismic resolution
Improving forward modelling
Improving imaging techniques
(often the first item is driven by the second one)
6. Pionner works: Biot (1941), Frenkel (1941), Gassmann (1951), Skempton (1954)
Porous-elastodynamics: Biot (1956,1962), Biot et Willis (1957)
Experimental validation: Plona (1980)
Various improvements or justifications: Auriault et al. (1985), Johnson et al. (1987), Berryman et al. (1995), Pride (2005),…
Forward problem solved by many authors following different strategies: Dai et al. (1995), Carcione et al. (1996), Haartsen et Pride (1997) both in frequency and time domains.
7. 7 Equations of poroelastodynamics I
8. 8
9. 9 Main features
10. 10
11. 11 Seismic wave modelling
12. 12 An example : the Sleipner of storage investigation in deep salt aquifer
13. 13 Wave propagation in porous media
14. 14 We may hope that the CO2 content could be estimated through wave signals (illumination k; broadband w) Deep storage of CO2
15. Forward modelling Time versus frequency formulations
Time : low memory requirement but integration stiffness (implicit integration)
Frequency : high memory requirement but nicely suited for imaging (many forward problems)
16. Motivation for DGPk Better description of the complexity of the medium
Efficiency when smooth velocity variation
17. Finite Volume approach
18. Finite volume approach
19. Complex free surface
20. Complex Boundaries
21. Extension to porous media Improve the time integration scheme
Global time integration (RK)
Local time integration (?)
Other alternatives (?)
Feasability of combining fluid & solid mechanics
22. Frequency formulation Whatever is the numerical formulation, it boils down to an algebric linear equation
A(m,w)p(x,w)=s(x,w)
If A is LU-decomposed, solving many forward problems is very efficient
27. Preliminary synthetic tests Synthetic model with body wave only
Homogeneous medium
2 circular inclusions of 20% high velocity
40m x 40m model
Spatial discretization step = 0.1m
Rickers Source centered on 88Hz
28. Preliminary synthetic tests Model and acquisition geometry
15 sources (Fz punctual forces) recorded by 36 receivers on the opposite side
The same acquisition on 4 sides of model
29. Preliminary synthetic tests Full wave inversion
Initial model homogeneous
Vp = 1 000 m/s
Vs = 500m/s
Inversion of 6 frequencies :
19.8 hz / 33.4 hz / 54.0 hz / 78.4 hz / 107.7 hz / 137.0 hz /
10 iterations per frequency
31. Preliminary synthetic tests Model and acquisition geometry
15 sources (Fz punctual forces) recorded by 36 receivers on the same side
The same acquisition on 4 sides of model
32. Preliminary synthetic tests Full wave inversion
Initial model homogeneous
Vp = 1 000 m/s
Vs = 500m/s
Inversion of 5 frequencies :
19.8 hz / 33.4 hz / 54.0 hz / 78.4 hz / 107.7 hz
10 iterations per frequency
34. WORK PLAN Formulation in 2D and 3D heterogeneous media (tuning theory through laboratory experiments)
Investigation of the « best » numerical technique for imaging processing (frequency; 2D geometry: B. Dupuy work)
Local imaging procedures (gradient; unicity: B. Dupuy work)
Applications to real data sets (to be defined)
35. Thank you