1 / 40

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument

<?xml version="1.0"?><AllQuestions />. <?xml version="1.0"?><AllResponses />.

chancellor-swanson
Download Presentation

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. <?xml version="1.0"?><AllQuestions /> <?xml version="1.0"?><AllResponses /> <?xml version="1.0"?><Settings><answerBulletFormat>Numeric</answerBulletFormat><answerNowAutoInsert>No</answerNowAutoInsert><answerNowStyle>Explosion</answerNowStyle><answerNowText>Answer Now</answerNowText><chartColors>Use PowerPoint Color Scheme</chartColors><chartType>Horizontal</chartType><correctAnswerIndicator>Checkmark</correctAnswerIndicator><countdownAutoInsert>No</countdownAutoInsert><countdownSeconds>10</countdownSeconds><countdownSound>TicToc.wav</countdownSound><countdownStyle>Box</countdownStyle><gridAutoInsert>No</gridAutoInsert><gridFillStyle>Answered</gridFillStyle><gridFillColor>255,255,0</gridFillColor><gridOpacity>50%</gridOpacity><gridTextStyle>Keypad #</gridTextStyle><inputSource>Response Devices</inputSource><multipleResponseDivisor># of Responses</multipleResponseDivisor><participantsLeaderBoard>5</participantsLeaderBoard><percentageDecimalPlaces>0</percentageDecimalPlaces><responseCounterAutoInsert>No</responseCounterAutoInsert><responseCounterStyle>Oval</responseCounterStyle><responseCounterDisplayValue># of Votes Received</responseCounterDisplayValue><insertObjectUsingColor>Red</insertObjectUsingColor><showResults>Yes</showResults><teamColors>Use PowerPoint Color Scheme</teamColors><teamIdentificationType>None</teamIdentificationType><teamScoringType>Voting pads only</teamScoringType><teamScoringDecimalPlaces>1</teamScoringDecimalPlaces><teamIdentificationItem></teamIdentificationItem><teamsLeaderBoard>5</teamsLeaderBoard><teamName1></teamName1><teamName2></teamName2><teamName3></teamName3><teamName4></teamName4><teamName5></teamName5><teamName6></teamName6><teamName7></teamName7><teamName8></teamName8><teamName9></teamName9><teamName10></teamName10><showControlBar>All Slides</showControlBar><defaultCorrectPointValue>0</defaultCorrectPointValue><defaultIncorrectPointValue>0</defaultIncorrectPointValue><chartColor1>187,224,227</chartColor1><chartColor2>51,51,153</chartColor2><chartColor3>0,153,153</chartColor3><chartColor4>153,204,0</chartColor4><chartColor5>128,128,128</chartColor5><chartColor6>0,0,0</chartColor6><chartColor7>0,102,204</chartColor7><chartColor8>204,204,255</chartColor8><chartColor9>255,0,0</chartColor9><chartColor10>255,255,0</chartColor10><teamColor1>187,224,227</teamColor1><teamColor2>51,51,153</teamColor2><teamColor3>0,153,153</teamColor3><teamColor4>153,204,0</teamColor4><teamColor5>128,128,128</teamColor5><teamColor6>0,0,0</teamColor6><teamColor7>0,102,204</teamColor7><teamColor8>204,204,255</teamColor8><teamColor9>255,0,0</teamColor9><teamColor10>255,255,0</teamColor10><displayAnswerImagesDuringVote>Yes</displayAnswerImagesDuringVote><displayAnswerImagesWithResponses>Yes</displayAnswerImagesWithResponses><displayAnswerTextDuringVote>Yes</displayAnswerTextDuringVote><displayAnswerTextWithResponses>Yes</displayAnswerTextWithResponses><questionSlideID></questionSlideID><controlBarState>Expanded</controlBarState><isGridColorKnownColor>True</isGridColorKnownColor><gridColorName>Yellow</gridColorName></Settings> <?xml version="1.0"?><AllAnswers /> Local Public Health System Assessmentusing the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 9 Evaluate Effectiveness, Accessibility, and Quality of Personal and Population-Based Health Services

  2. 10 9.1.1 In the past three years, has the LPHS evaluated population-based health services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  3. 10 9.1.1.1 Are established criteria used to evaluate population-based health services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  4. 10 9.1.1.2 Does the evaluation determine the extent to which program goals are achieved for population-based health services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  5. 10 9.1.2 Does the LPHS assess community satisfaction with population-based health services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  6. 10 9.1.2.1 Does the assessment:Gather input from residents representing a cross-section of the community? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  7. 10 9.1.2.2 Does the assessment:Determine if residents’ needs are being met, including those groups at increased risk of negative health outcomes? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  8. 10 9.1.2.3 Does the assessment:Determine residents’ satisfaction with the responsiveness to their complaints or concerns regarding population-based health services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  9. 10 9.1.2.4 Does the assessment:Identify areas where population-based health services can be improved? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  10. 10 9.1.3 Does the LPHS identify gaps in the provision of population-based health services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  11. 10 9.1.4 Do organizations within the LPHS use the results of population-based health services evaluation in the development of their strategic and operational plans? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  12. 10 9.2.1 In the past three years, have organizations within the LPHS evaluated personal health services for the community? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  13. 10 9.2.1.1 Were the following assessed:Access to personal health services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  14. 10 9.2.1.2 Were the following assessed:The quality of personal health services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  15. 10 9.2.1.3 Were the following assessed:The effectiveness of personal health services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  16. 10 9.2.2 Are specific personal health services in the community evaluated against established standards (e.g., JCAHO, State licensure, HEDIS)? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  17. 10 9.2.3 Does the LPHS assess client satisfaction with personal health services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  18. 10 9.2.3.1 Were surveyed clients representative of past, current and potential users of services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  19. 10 9.2.4 Do organizations within the LPHS use information technology to assure quality of personal health services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  20. 10 9.2.4.1 Do organizations use electronic health records? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  21. 10 9.2.4.2 Is information technology used to facilitate communication among providers (e.g., Health Information Exchange or Regional HealthInformation Organizations)? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  22. 10 9.2.5Do organizations within the LPHS use the results of the evaluation in the development of their strategic and operational plans? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  23. 10 9.3.1 Has the LPHS identified community organizations or entities that contribute to the delivery of the Essential Public Health Services? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  24. 10 9.3.2Is an evaluation of the LPHS conducted every three to five years? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  25. 10 9.3.2.1 Does the evaluation:Assess the comprehensiveness of LPHS activities? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  26. 10 9.3.2.2 Does the evaluation:Use established standards (e.g., National Public Health Performance Standards Program)? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  27. 10 9.3.2.3 Do LPHS entities participate in the evaluation of the LPHS? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  28. 10 9.3.3 Has a partnership assessment been conducted that evaluates the relationships among organizations that comprise the LPHS (e.g., the NPHPSP or an evaluation of a partnership within the MAPP process)? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  29. 10 9.3.3.1Is the exchange of information among the organizations in the LPHS assessed? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  30. 10 9.3.3.2 Are linkage mechanisms among the providers of population-based services and personal health services assessed (e.g., referral systems, memoranda of understanding)? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  31. 10 9.3.3.3 Is the use of resources (e.g., staff, communication systems) to support the coordination among LPHS organizations assessed? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  32. 10 9.3.4 Does the LPHS use results from the evaluation process to guide community health improvements? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  33. 10 9.3.4.1 Are the results from the evaluation process used:To refine existing community health programs? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  34. 10 9.3.4.2 Are the results from the evaluation process used:To establish new community health programs? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  35. 10 9.3.4.3 Are the results from the evaluation process used:To redirect resources? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  36. 10 9.3.4.4 Are the results from the evaluation process used:To inform the community health improvement process? • No (0% or absolutely no activity) • Minimal (1% - 25%) • Moderate (26% - 50%) • Significant (51% - 75%) • Optimal (greater than 75%)

  37. Thank You! Civic Groups Schools Nursing Homes Recreation Centers Neighborhood Organizations Non-Profit Organizations EMS Home Health Hospitals Drug Treatment Laboratories Public Health Agency Mental Health Doctors Law Enforcement Faith Institutions Fire Community Health Centers Transit Tribal Health Elected Officials Employers Corrections

More Related