1 / 14

Methods

Post-harvest Clean Up Crew: Flash-grazed Hogs in Organic Fruit Orchards Krista Buehrer 1 and Dr. Matthew Grieshop 1 1 Michigan State University Entomology Department. Methods. Three crops: cherry, pear, apple Two replicates 3 grazed plots/rep 3 ungrazed plots/rep Three 20m transects/plot

chancellor-dale
Download Presentation

Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Post-harvest Clean Up Crew: Flash-grazed Hogs in Organic Fruit OrchardsKrista Buehrer1 and Dr. Matthew Grieshop11 Michigan State University Entomology Department

  2. Methods • Three crops: cherry, pear, apple • Two replicates • 3 grazed plots/rep • 3 ungrazed plots/rep • Three 20m transects/plot • Ground cover measured every meter • All fruit collected from 4 random quadrats • Fruit weighed and insect presence evaluated

  3. Methods • 12 Yorkshire hogs • Hogs relatively large, all but one over 140lbs • Hogs rotated through plots every ~ 2 days

  4. Plot Layout • Plots 81 x 81 ft (0.15 acres) • Electric rope fencing with step-in posts and t-posts at the corners

  5. Ground Cover Results • Grass ground cover statistically the same in grazed and ungrazed plots before the hogs (p=0.67) • Hogs significantly decreased grass ground cover (p=0.000002)

  6. Ground Cover Results • Bare ground statistically the same in grazed and ungrazed plots before hogs (p=0.16) • Hogs significantly increased bare ground cover (p=0.000005)

  7. Ground Cover Results • Fruit ground cover statistically the same before hogs (p=0.58) • Hogs significantly decreased fruit ground cover (p=0.000000002)

  8. Ground Cover Results Ungrazed Grazed

  9. Fruit Biomass • Fruit biomass statistically the same before hogs in grazed and ungrazed plots (p=0.28) • Hogs significantly reduced fruit biomass (t=26.92, d.f.=4, p=0.000001)

  10. Fruit Biomass

  11. Conclusions • Hogs significantly impact ground cover • Hog are a potentially effective tool to reduce fruit biomass leftover from harvest • Hogs may impact a few pest insects, but more in depth study is required

  12. Conclusions • Large hogs most likely not suitable for high density orchards or trees with shallow root systems due to heavy rooting behavior

  13. Acknowledgements • Gene Garthe • Jess Piskor • Phil Kavouriaris • Emily Pochubay

More Related