1 / 27

Disentangling form and content with the Dual-Source Model of probabilistic conditional reasoning

Examining the likelihood of pregnancy based on sexual intercourse using the Dual-Source Model of probabilistic conditional reasoning. Investigating the role of conditional probabilities and conditional predictions.

cdanny
Download Presentation

Disentangling form and content with the Dual-Source Model of probabilistic conditional reasoning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Beyond updating: Disentangling form and content with the dual-source model of probabilistic conditional reasoning. Henrik Singmann Christoph Klauer Sieghard Beller

  2. A girl had NOT had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is NOT pregnant? A girl is NOT pregnant. How likely is it that the girl had NOT had sexual intercourse? A girl is pregnant. How likely is it that the girl had sexual intercourse? A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant?

  3. 3 free parameters Provides conditional probabilities/predictions: P(MP) = P(q|p) = P(pq) / P(p) P(MT) = P(¬p|¬q) = P(¬p¬q) / P(¬q) P(AC) = P(p|q) = P(pq) / P(q) P(DA) = P(¬q|¬p) = P(¬p¬q) / P(¬p) A girl had NOT had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is NOT pregnant? A girl is NOT pregnant. How likely is it that the girl had NOT had sexual intercourse? A girl is pregnant. How likely is it that the girl had sexual intercourse? A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? Oaksford, Chater, & Larkin (2000) Oaksford & Chater (2007)

  4. Experimental Paradigm Full Inferences (Week 2+) Full Inferences (Week 2+) Full Inferences (Week 2+) Full Inferences (Week 2+) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? Klauer, Beller, & Hütter (2010) Singmann, Klauer, & Beller (2016)

  5. Experimental Paradigm Full Inferences (Week 2+) Full Inferences (Week 2+) Full Inferences (Week 2+) Full Inferences (Week 2+) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? Klauer, Beller, & Hütter (2010) Singmann, Klauer, & Beller (2016)

  6. Bayesian Updating Full Inferences (Week 2) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? • Role of conditional in Bayesian models: • PROB: increases probability of conditional, P(q|p) (Oaksford et al., 2000) • EX-PROB: increases probability of conditional PMP(q|p) > Pother(q|p) (Oaksford & Chater, 2007) • KL: increases P(q|p) & Kullback-Leibler distance between g and g' is minimal (Hartmann & Rafiee Rad, 2012) • Consequence of updating: Effect is content specific. ?

  7. Effect of Conditional Reduced Inferences (Week 1) Full Inferences (Week 2) If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? Klauer, Beller, & Hütter (2010, Exp. 1)

  8. Dual-Source Model (DSM) Klauer, Beller, & Hütter (2010) Singmann, Klauer, & Beller (2016) knowledge-based form-based C = content (oneforeachpandq) x = inference (MP, MT, AC, & DA)

  9. Meta-ANalysis • 7 datasets (Klauer et al., 2010; Singmann et al., 2016) • total N = 179 • reducedandfullconditionalinferencesonly • no additional manipulations • eachmodelfittedtodataofeach individual participant. meanfreeparameters: 17.3 17.7 22.1 17.7 Singmann, Klauer, & Beller (2016)

  10. Dual-Source Model (DSM) Exp. 2: validate Exp. 1: validate knowledge-based Singmann, Klauer, & Beller (2016) form-based C = content (oneforeachpandq) x = inference (MP, MT, AC, & DA)

  11. Exp. 1: Manipulating Form Conditional Inferences (Week 2/3) Biconditional Inferences (Week 2/3) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then and only then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? • 4 different conditionals • 4 inferences (MP, MT, AC, DA) per conditional • N = 31

  12. Exp. 1: Manipulating Form Conditional Inferences (Week 2/3) Biconditional Inferences (Week 2/3) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then and only then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? • 4 different conditionals • 4 inferences (MP, MT, AC, DA) per conditional • N = 31

  13. Exp. 1: Manipulating Form Conditional Inferences (Week 2/3) Biconditional Inferences (Week 2/3) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then and only then she is pregnant.A girl had sexual intercourse. How likely is it that the girl is pregnant? ns. *** • 4 different conditionals • 4 inferences (MP, MT, AC, DA) per conditional • N = 31

  14. Exp. 2: Manipulating Expertise Full Inferences, Expert (Week 2) Full Inferences, Non-Expert (Week 2) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) A nutrition scientist says: If Anne eats a lot of parsley then the level of iron in her blood will increase.Anne eats a lot of parsley. How likely is it that the level of iron in her blood will increase? A drugstore clerk says: If Anne eats a lot of parsley then the level of iron in her blood will increase.Anne eats a lot of parsley. How likely is it that the level of iron in her blood will increase? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.Anne eats a lot of parsley. How likely is it that the level of iron in her blood will increase? or • 6 different conditionals • 3 expert • 3 non-exprt • 4 inferences (MP, MT, AC, DA) per conditional • N = 47

  15. Exp. 2: Manipulating Expertise Full Inferences, Expert (Week 2) Full Inferences, Non-Expert (Week 2) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) A nutrition scientist says: If Anne eats a lot of parsley then the level of iron in her blood will increase.Anne eats a lot of parsley. How likely is it that the level of iron in her blood will increase? A drugstore clerk says: If Anne eats a lot of parsley then the level of iron in her blood will increase.Anne eats a lot of parsley. How likely is it that the level of iron in her blood will increase? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.Anne eats a lot of parsley. How likely is it that the level of iron in her blood will increase? or • 6 different conditionals • 3 expert • 3 non-exprt • 4 inferences (MP, MT, AC, DA) per conditional • N = 47

  16. Exp. 2: Manipulating Expertise Full Inferences, Expert (Week 2) Full Inferences, Non-Expert (Week 2) Reduced Inferences (Week 1) A nutrition scientist says: If Anne eats a lot of parsley then the level of iron in her blood will increase.Anne eats a lot of parsley. How likely is it that the level of iron in her blood will increase? A drugstore clerk says: If Anne eats a lot of parsley then the level of iron in her blood will increase.Anne eats a lot of parsley. How likely is it that the level of iron in her blood will increase? If a girl had sexual intercourse, then she is pregnant.Anne eats a lot of parsley. How likely is it that the level of iron in her blood will increase? or ns. * • 6 different conditionals • 3 expert • 3 non-exprt • 4 inferences (MP, MT, AC, DA) per conditional • N = 47

  17. Dual-Source Model (DSM) Exp. 2: validate Exp. 1: validate knowledge-based Oaksford & Chater, … Singmann, Klauer, & Beller (2016) form-based C = content (oneforeachpandq) x = inference (MP, MT, AC, & DA)

  18. Summary • Bayesian updating does not seem to explain effect of conditional. • Probability theory cannot function as wholesale replacement for logic as computational-level theory of what inferences people should draw (cf. Chater & Oaksford, 2001). • DSM adequately describes probabilistic conditional reasoning: • When formal structure absent, reasoning purely Bayesian (i.e., based on background knowledge only). • Formal structure provides reasoners with additional information about quality of inference (i.e., degree to which inference is seen as logically warranted). • Responses to full inferences reflect weighted mixture of Bayesian knowledge-based component and form-based component. • DSM useful and parsimonious measurement model.

  19. That was all

  20. Suppression Effects: MP Byrne (1989) Baseline Condition Disablers Condition Alternatives Condition If a balloon is pricked with a needle then it will quickly lose air.If a balloon is pricked with a knife then it will quickly lose air.A balloon is pricked with a needle. How likely is it that the balloon quickly looses air? If a balloon is pricked with a needle then it will quickly lose air.If a balloon is inflated to begin with then it will quickly lose air.A balloon is pricked with a needle. How likely is it that the balloon quickly looses air? If a balloon is pricked with a needle then it will quickly lose air. A balloon is pricked with a needle. How likely is it that the balloon quickly looses air? Additional disablers reduce endorsement to MP and MT. Additional alternatives do not affect endorsement to MP and MT.

  21. Suppression Effects: AC Byrne (1989) Baseline Condition Disablers Condition Alternatives Condition If a balloon is pricked with a needle then it will quickly lose air.If a balloon is pricked with a knife then it will quickly lose air.A balloon quickly looses air. How likely is it that the balloon was pricked with a needle? If a balloon is pricked with a needle then it will quickly lose air.If a balloon is inflated to begin with then it will quickly lose air.A balloon quickly looses air. How likely is it that the balloon was pricked with a needle? If a balloon is pricked with a needle then it will quickly lose air. A balloon quickly looses air. How likely is it that the balloon was pricked with a needle? Additional disablers do not affect endorsement to AC and DA. Additional alternatives reduce endorsement to AC and DA.

  22. Exp. 3: Procedure Full Baseline Condition Reduced Baseline Condition Full Disablers Condition Reduced Disablers Condition Full Alternatives Condition Reduced Alternatives Condition If a balloon is pricked with a needle then it will quickly lose air.If a balloon is pricked with a knife then it will quickly lose air.A balloon is pricked with a needle. How likely is it that the balloon quickly looses air? If a balloon is pricked with a needle then it will quickly lose air.If a balloon is pricked with a knife then it will quickly lose air.A balloon is pricked with a needle. How likely is it that the balloon quickly looses air? If a balloon is pricked with a needle then it will quickly lose air.If a balloon is inflated to begin with then it will quickly lose air.A balloon is pricked with a needle. How likely is it that the balloon quickly looses air? If a balloon is pricked with a needle then it will quickly lose air.If a balloon is inflated to begin with then it will quickly lose air.A balloon is pricked with a needle. How likely is it that the balloon quickly looses air? If a balloon is pricked with a needle then it will quickly lose air. A balloon is pricked with a needle. How likely is it that the balloon quickly looses air? If a balloon is pricked with a needle then it will quickly lose air. A balloon is pricked with a needle. How likely is it that the balloon quickly looses air?

  23. Total N: 167 Exp. 3: Disabling Condition Reduced Inferences (Week 1) Full Inferences (Week 2) If a person drinks a lot of coke then the person will gain weight.A person drinks a lot of coke. How likely is it that the person will gain weight? Please note:A person only gains weight if the metabolism of the person permits it, the person does not exercise as a compensation, the person does not only drink diet coke. If a person drinks a lot of coke then the person will gain weight.A person drinks a lot of coke. How likely is it that the person will gain weight? Please note:A person only gains weight if • the metabolism of the person permits it, • the person does not exercise as a compensation, • the person does not only drink diet coke.

  24. Total N: 167 Exp. 3: Disabling Condition Reduced Inferences (Week 1) Full Inferences (Week 2) If a person drinks a lot of coke then the person will gain weight.A person drinks a lot of coke. How likely is it that the person will gain weight? Please note:A person only gains weight if the metabolism of the person permits it, the person does not exercise as a compensation, the person does not only drink diet coke. If a person drinks a lot of coke then the person will gain weight.A person drinks a lot of coke. How likely is it that the person will gain weight? Please note:A person only gains weight if • the metabolism of the person permits it, • the person does not exercise as a compensation, • the person does not only drink diet coke.

  25. Total N: 167 Exp. 3: Disabling Condition Reduced Inferences (Week 1) Full Inferences (Week 2) If a person drinks a lot of coke then the person will gain weight.A person drinks a lot of coke. How likely is it that the person will gain weight? Please note:A person only gains weight if the metabolism of the person permits it, the person does not exercise as a compensation, the person does not only drink diet coke. If a person drinks a lot of coke then the person will gain weight.A person drinks a lot of coke. How likely is it that the person will gain weight? Please note:A person only gains weight if • the metabolism of the person permits it, • the person does not exercise as a compensation, • the person does not only drink diet coke. *** ** *** * *** ***

  26. Suppression Effects in Reasoning In line with formal accounts: Disablers and alternatives suppress form-based evidence for „attacked“ inferences. • In line with probabilistic accounts: Alternatives (and to lesser degree disablers) decreased the knowledge-based support of the attacked inferences. • Difference suggests that disablers are automatically considered, but not alternatives: neglect of alternatives in causal Bayesian reasoning (e.g., Fernbach & Erb, 2013). • Only disablers discredit conditional (in line with pragmatic accounts, e.g., Bonnefon & Politzer, 2010)

  27. That was all

More Related