1 / 11

A Brief Introduction to the CLIC Study

A Brief Introduction to the CLIC Study. W. Wuensch TUM visit 8-6-2009. What is the CLIC study? A collaboration lead by CERN to develop the technology for a next generation high-energy physics facility – TeV range e- /e+ linear collider.

cargan
Download Presentation

A Brief Introduction to the CLIC Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Brief Introduction to the CLIC Study W. Wuensch TUM visit 8-6-2009

  2. What is the CLIC study? • A collaboration lead by CERN to develop the technology for a next generation high-energy physics facility – TeV range e-/e+ linear collider. • ECM should cover range from ILC to LHC maximum reach and beyond  ECM = 0.5-3 TeV, • L > few 1034 cm-2with acceptable background and energy spread • Design compatible with maximum length ~ 50 km • Affordable! • Total power consumption < 500 MW • Physics motivation: • "Physics at the CLIC Multi-TeV Linear Collider: report of the CLIC Physics Working Group,“ • CERN report 2004-5 • Present goal: • Demonstrate all key feasibility issues and document in a CDR by 2010 http://clic-study.web.cern.ch/CLIC-Study/

  3. CLIC Layout 3 TeV

  4. Two-beam module All 3D models made by A. Samoshkin

  5. The CLIC world wide collaboration Ankara University (Turkey) BINP (Russia) CERN CIEMAT (Spain) Cockcroft Institute (UK) Gazi Universities (Turkey) IRFU/Saclay (France) JINR (Russia) JLAB (USA) KEK (Japan) LAL/Orsay (France) LAPP/ESIA (France) NCP (Pakistan) North-West. Univ. Illinois (USA) Oslo University (Norway) PSI (Switzerland), Polytech. University of Catalonia (Spain) RRCAT-Indore (India) Royal Holloway, Univ. London, (UK) SLAC (USA) Uppsala University (Sweden) Helsinki Institute of Physics (Finland) IAP (Russia) IAP NASU (Ukraine) Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (Spain) INFN / LNF (Italy) J.Adams Institute, (UK) EPAC 2008 CLIC / CTF3 G.Geschonke, CERN 5

  6. Primary areas of accelerator R&D in the CLIC study • Beam physics – Overall machine design and optimization. Complex simulations of many the effects which can drive instabilities. Ensure sub-nm final beam size, 0.2 degree phase stability. • CTF3 experimental facility – drive beam generation, accelerator physics, high beam powers and efficiency, operation and protection. • High-power rf structures – X-band structures with 150 MW generation and 100 MV/m acceleration. Structure design to prototype testing. • High-precision mechanical alignment and stabilization – Microns and sub-nanometer respectively. System design and demonstration. • Subsystem design and integration • Cost studies

  7. Some areas of collaboration on areas of potential interest to TUM, • RF structure development • Electromagnetic computation – rf design, wakefields, HOM damping, rf components • Test structure program – fabrication, high-power testing • Fundamental breakdown physics studies – simulation, experiment and development of scaling laws • Precision manufacture and assembly – micron tolerances in complex 3-D geometries, mechanical control, mass production • Phase stabilization – 0.2 degree at 12 GHz (14 µm, 50 fs) timing stability over large distances, 10’s of km, and times, hundreds of µsec. RF structure design, phase detection, beam-feedback implementation. • Active alignment – 5-10 µm precision over distances up to 100 m or so. • Mechanical stabilization – 1 nm in the 4000 main linac quadrupoles and 0.1 nm in the final focusing quadrupoles. • Instrumentation – Huge numbers, 100s of thousands, of signals from beam position monitors, profile monitors, rf signals.

  8. Two T18_VG2.4_DISC Structures Structure for SLAC Test Structure for KEK Test

  9. Unloaded Gradient at Different Conditioning Times For Constant Breakdown Rate C. Adolphsen

  10. PETS high power tests at SLAC 11. 424 GHz PETS measurements after final assembly Assembly of the eight PETS bars. 11.424 GHz PETS ready PETS installed into the ASTA test area at SLAC

  11. ASTA PETS processing history Example of the pulses envelopes in ASTA 130 MW “short” 133 ns TBTS PETS, 140 ns flat, 25 minutes. 103 MW “long” 266 ns In general, the PETS has been processing up in power well. • Beginning 12.05.09 processing of PETS with 133 ns we end up with 180MW on evening of 20.05.09 • 21.05.09 widened pulse to 266n s and have processed up to 103MW so far. • Vacuum activity mostly in output end of PETS structure. Jim Lewandowski (SLAC) PETS 1st run (winter 2008/09) PETS 2nd run (May 2009…) 200 266 ns 133 ns 266 ns 180 160 153 MW (CLIC 0.5 TeV target) 135 MW (CLIC 3 TeV target) Power [MW] 12.05.09 210 Hours 150 Hours

More Related