1 / 47

Coaching for Implementation: Best Practices Perspective

Coaching for Implementation: Best Practices Perspective. George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut June 15 2011 www.pbis.org www.scalingup.org www.swis.org. www.pbis.org. PURPOSE

camila
Download Presentation

Coaching for Implementation: Best Practices Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Coaching for Implementation: Best Practices Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut June 15 2011 www.pbis.org www.scalingup.org www.swis.org

  2. www.pbis.org

  3. PURPOSE Describe coaching from perspective of capacity building & effective implementation fidelity & student outcomes • Rationale • General Framework • Examples & considerations

  4. Rationale

  5. Problem Statement “We give schools strategies & systems for improving practice & outcomes, but implementation is not accurate, consistent, or durable, & desired outcomes aren’t realized. School personnel & teams need more thanexposure, practice, & enthusiasm.”

  6. REACT to Problem Behavior WAIT for New Problem Expect, But HOPE for Implementation Select & ADD Practice Hire EXPERT to Train Practice 34 “Train & Hope”

  7. SWPBS/PBIS Lessons Learned

  8. General Framework

  9. Integrated Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES 15 Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior DATA SYSTEMS PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior

  10. Basic “Logic” Educational & Social Benefits

  11. “Coaching Considerations”

  12. General Considerations • Who’s coaching? • Who’s being coached? • Who directly & indirectly benefits from coaching? • What is being coached? • Where does coaching occur? • How are coaches prepared? • Who coaches the coaches? • How is coaching provided? • How is coaching implementation fidelity evaluated? • How is coaching effectiveness evaluated? • Are practice implementation benefits meaningful?

  13. Planning Questions

  14. SWPBS Implementation Blueprint www.pbis.org

  15. Team 35 GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: “Getting Started” Agreements Data-based Action Plan Evaluation Implementation

  16. www.scalingup.org Dean Fixsen Karen Blase UNC

  17. Implementation Stages Implementation Drivers Effective Implementation Science (SISEP) PEP –PIP Loops Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle

  18. * SchPsy * SW * SCoun * SpEd * Admin * BehSpc * Anyone w/ opportunity to coach Continuum of Coaching Functions State District School Classroom Student

  19. “Easier to coach what you know & have experienced.”

  20. Evaluation Criteria

  21. “Treatment integrity is the extent to which essential intervention components are delivered in a comprehensive and consistent manner by an interventionist trained to deliver the intervention” Sanetti & Kratochwill, in press.

  22. Competing, Inter-related National Goals • Improve literacy, math, geography, science, etc. • Make schools safe, caring, & focused on teaching & learning • Improve student character & citizenship • Eliminate bullying • Prevent drug use • Prepare for postsecondary education • Provide a free & appropriate education for all • Prepare viable workforce • Affect rates of high risk, antisocial behavior • Etc….

  23. Working Smarter

  24. Sample Teaming Matrix Are outcomes measurable?

  25. SWPBS Team Training Example

  26. Before Team Training • Review SWPBS Workbook • Verify coaching role with Coordinator • Review coaching role with Principal • Review status of team: principal, grade level representatives, special educator, counselor, parent, classified staff members (Committee Review) • Ask team to bring discipline data, behavior incident reports, ODR forms, school discipline policy, procedures for teaching SW behavior expectations, procedures for encouraging SW expectations, etc. • Review tools: Team Implementation Checklist, EBS Self-Assessment Survey, Committee Review, Action Planning

  27. During Team Training • Remind team of coaching role • Let team lead process • Document agreements • Keep team on task & reinforce progress • Remind team of big ideas (“refrigerator magnets”) from presentations • Remind team to include all staff • Prompt outcomes: Team Implementation Checklist, Team Action Plan, Committee Review, EBS Self-assessment Survey

  28. After Team Training • Acknowledge/reinforce principal & team for progress at training • Prompt team to • Meet & review PBS purpose & action plan with staff • Collect school data • Meet w/in 1 month • Complete Team Implementation Checklist 1 month later • Contact team leader 2x in first month & ask • What is planned • If assistance needed • Set schedule to attend team meeting 1x month • Monitor & assist in development & completion of teamaction plan • Review/completeCoaches Implementation Checklist • Document team & coaching accomplishments, speed bumps, challenges, solutions

  29. Coaching & Monitoring Progress: SWPBS Example

  30. Getting Started:“Team Implementation Checklist” (TIC)

  31. Big Ideas • Coaching capacity is defined as activities or functions, not person • End goal of coaching is to maximize adoption, durability, & scalability of evidence-based practice experienced by students • Coaching functions have varied levels of intensity • Coaching functions are shared responsibilities • Coaching capacity at multiple organizational levels (teacher, school, district, region, state) • Coaching implementation capacity should be planned, formal, continually monitored, and systematically evaluated

  32. Planning Questions

  33. George.sugai@uconn.edu Robh@uoregon.edu www.pbis.org

More Related