1 / 21

Confinement, Transport and Turbulence Properties of NSTX Plasmas

Office of Science. Supported by. Confinement, Transport and Turbulence Properties of NSTX Plasmas. College W&M Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL PPPL PSI Princeton U SNL Think Tank, Inc.

Download Presentation

Confinement, Transport and Turbulence Properties of NSTX Plasmas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Office of Science Supported by Confinement, Transport and Turbulence Properties of NSTX Plasmas College W&M Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL PPPL PSI Princeton U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Maryland U Rochester U Washington U Wisconsin Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAERI Ioffe Inst RRC Kurchatov Inst TRINITI KBSI KAIST ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep U Quebec S.M. Kaye*, R.E. Bell, B.P. LeBlanc, D. Mikkelsen, H. Park, G. Rewoldt, W. Wang (PPPL), D. Stutman, K. Tritz (JHU), F. Levinton, H. Yuh (Nova Photonics) *PPPL, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ EPS Meeting July 2-6, 2007 Warsaw, Poland 1

  2. NSTX Addresses Transport & Turbulence Issues Critical to Both Basic Toroidal Confinement and Future Devices • NSTX offers a novel view into plasma T&T properties • NSTX operates in a unique part of dimensionless parameter space: R/a, bT, (r*,n*) • Dominant electron heating with NBI: relevant to a-heating in ITER • Excellent laboratory in which to study electron transport: electron transport anomalous, ions close to neoclassical • Large range of bT spanning e-s to e-m turbulence regimes • Strong rotational shear that can influence transport • Localized electron-scale turbulence measurable (re ~ 0.1 mm) Major Radius R0 0.85 m Aspect Ratio A 1.3 Elongation k 2.8 Triangularity d 0.8 Plasma Current Ip 1.5 MA Toroidal Field BT 0.55 T Pulse Length 1.5 s NB Heating (100 keV) 7 MW bT,tot up to 40% 2

  3. This Poster Will Focus on Confinement & Transport Trends in NSTX and Their Underlying Processes • Key confinement and transport dependences established (BT, Ip, b, n*, q(r),…) • Dedicated scans have isolated Ip and BT dependences • Theory/simulations have indicated ETG and microtearing modes could be important in controlling electron transport • Localized turbulence characteristics being assessed across wide range of k (upper ITG/TEM to ETG) • Dimensionless parameter scans in bT • Studied effect of plasma shaping on b-degradation of confinement • Momentum transport studies just beginning • Momentum and ion transport decoupled in NSTX 3

  4. LRDFIT Reconstruction New Diagnostic Capabilities Have Facilitated Progress in Understanding Transport Processes Tangential micorwave scattering measures localized electron-scale turbulence 12 channel MSE[NOVA Photonics] • kr=2 (upper ITG/TEM) to ~24 (ETG) cm-1 • re ~0.01 cm • Dr ~ 6 cm • Dk ~ 1 cm-1 • Can vary location of scattering volume • (near Rmag to near edge) Important for equilibrium and microinstability calculations 4

  5. Microwave scattering system measures reduced fluctuations (n/n) in both upper ITG/TEM and ETG ranges during H-mode ~ ELMs Turbulence Measurements + Gyrokinetic Calculations Have Helped Identify Possible Sources of Transport Ion and electron transport change going from L- to H-modes Electron transport reduced, but remains anomalous Ion transport during H-phase is neoclassical - Localized measurement (axis to edge) - Excellent radial resolution (3 cm) 5

  6. Theory/Gyrokinetic Calculations Indicate Both ITG/TEM and ETG are Possible Candidates for Electron Transport GS2 calculations indicate lower linear growth rates at all wavenumbers during H- than during L-phase:ETG unstable Non-linear GTC results indicate ITG modes stable during H-phase; ci ~ neoclassical 6

  7. Dedicated H-mode Confinement Scaling Experiments Have Isolated the BT and Ip Dependences Scans carried out at constant density, injected power (4 MW) 0.50 s 0.50 s 7

  8. Dedicated H-mode Confinement Scaling ExperimentsHave Revealed Some Surprises Strong dependence of tE on BT Weaker dependence on Ip H98y,2 ~ 0.9 → 1.1 → 1.4 H98y,2 ~ 1.4 → 1.3 → 1.1 4 MW 4 MW tE,98y,2 ~ BT0.15 tE,98y,2 ~ Ip0.93 NSTX tE exhibits strong scaling at fixed q tE~Ip1.3-1.5 at fixed q tE,98y,2~Ip1.1 at fixed q 8

  9. Local Transport Studies Reveal Sources of Energy Confinement Trends Electrons primarily responsible for strong BT scaling in NSTX (tE~BT0.9) Variation in near-neoclassical ion transport primarily responsible for Ip scaling (tE~Ip0.4) Electrons anomalous Ions near neoclassical Neoclassical Neoclassical levels determined from GTC-Neo: includes finite banana width effects (non-local) 9

  10. Theory/Gyrokinetic Calculations Suggest ETG May Play an Important Role in Determining Electron Transport at Low BT ETG linearly unstable only at lowest BT - 0.35 T: R/LTe 20% above critical gradient - 0.45, 0.55 T: R/LTe 20-30% below critical gradient Non-linear simulations indicate formation of radial streamers (up to 200re):FLR-modified fluid code [Horton et al., PoP 2005] GS2 0.35 T Kim, IFS Saturated ETG level TRANSP Good agreement between experimental and theoretical saturated transport level at 0.35 T Qe (kW/m2) 10

  11. Change in High-k Scattering Spectra with r/a and BT Consistent with Variations of ce • Outboard edge measurement showsdecreaseof fluctuations at higher BT (consistent withlowerce at higher BT) • Core measurement showsincreaseof fluctuations at higher BT (consistent withhigherceat higher BT) [see Park et al., P2.045] 11

  12. Strongly Reversed Magnetic Shear L-mode Plasmas Achieve Higher Te and Reduced Transport Linear GS2 calculations indicate reduced region of mtearing instability for RS plasma (r/a=0.3) ETG stable in this region in both plasmas (see Wong, this conf) Calculated high-k-driven turbulent transport heat fluxes outside RS region consistent with inferred level (D. Mikkelsen) F. Levinton, APS 2006 12

  13. Dimensionless Parameter Scans Have Addressed High-Priority ITPA Issues – Beta Dependence of Confinement b-scan at fixed q, BT - b-dependence important to ITER advanced scenarios (Bt98y2~b-0.9) - Factor of 2-2.5 variation in bT - Degradation of tE with b weak on NSTX ne*-scan at fixed q - Factor of >3 variation in ne* -Strong increase of confinement with decreasing collisionality 20% variation in re, ne* k=2.1 d=0.6 13

  14. Power/Beta Scan Was Repeated at Lower k, d to Test Effect of Shape on Confinement Dependence • k=1.8-1.9, d~0.4; ne*, re vary ≤ 20% across scan • ELM severity increased with increasing power • Weak increase of b with power • Type III ELMs severely degrade confinement 14

  15. Confinement Exhibits Strong Degradation with bT in Weakly-Shaped Plasmas • Strong degradation of tE (tE ~ bT-1.0) • Stronger degradation of tE,th than bT,th-0.35 cannot be ruled out 15

  16. Momentum Confinement Studies • Low BT (0.35-0.55 T) operation leads to values of wExB up to the MHz range • These ExB shear values can exceed ITG/TEM growth rates by factors of 5 to 10 • Statistical studies indicate cf does not scale with ci in NSTX Due to suppression of ITG modes? 16

  17. Steady-State Momentum Transport Determined From BT, Ip Scans No anomalous pinch necessary to explain steady-state rotation data 17

  18. Core Momentum Diffusivities Up to An Order of Magnitude Lower Than Thermal Diffusivities Does cf scale with ce? What is cf,neo? (0.1-0.4 m2/s by very simple estimate) 18

  19. R~1.32 m R~1.15 m Dedicated Perturbative Momentum Confinement Experiments Recently Carried Out • Use non-resonant n=3 magnetic perturbations to damp plasma rotation; turn nRMP off for plasma spin-up • Use plasma spin-up dynamics to determine tf, cf, vpinch 19

  20. Instantaneous and Perturbative Determination of tf During Spin-up Agree • Use dL/dt = T – L/tf relation to determine instantaneous tf • Model spin-up to determine perturbative tf using L(t) = tf* [T – (T-L0/tf) * exp(-t/tf)], where L = Angular momentum T = Torque L0 = Angular momentum at time of nRMP turn-off 20

  21. Detailed Energy and Momentum Confinement Studies in NSTX Are Underway • Confinement and transport trends found to differ from those at higher R/a • Strong BT, weaker Ip scaling • Electron transport variation primarily responsible for BT scaling • Ions near neoclassical; primarily responsible for Ip scaling • Understand the source of the difference in confinement trends at different R/a (low vs high-k turbulence dominant at different R/a, BT?) • Theory indicates that high-k ETG modes could be important • Need also to consider lower-k modes in some cases (ITG/TEM) • No degradation of BtE with bT in strongly-shaped plasmas • Degradation seen in more weakly-shaped plasmas • Degradation invariably tied to change in ELM severity • Momentum transport studies are just beginning • Steady-state power balance and perturbative analyses indicate long momentum confinement times (>100 ms), with cf<<ci • Momentum diffusivity does not scale with ion thermal diffusivity • Possibly due to suppression of ITG modes in NSTX, and neoclassical transport controlling both ion heat and momentum diffusion 21

More Related