180 likes | 247 Views
Discover GaMEP's five key initiatives and how they are driving economic development through strategic partnerships and innovative solutions. Learn about our response to previous recommendations and our commitment to continuous improvement.
E N D
GaMEP Center Review February 13, 2002
Overview • Our Organization • Five Strategic Initiatives • Previous Panel’s Recommendations and Our Response • GaMEP’s Performance
Ga Tech EDI: GaMEP’s Host Organization • Serving Existing Industry is an integral part of economic development • Strong State support for this integrated approach
Leverage • EDI leverages its complementary resources for the benefit of all sponsors • SETAAC & EDA University Center • GPAC • FaciliTech • NASA • Big Georgia Tech • A budget vs. B budget • DOE • Economic Development Programs
Five Strategic Initiatives • Integrating the strategies of our sponsors • Increasing the recognition, advocacy and support of our brand • Strategic partners • Communications • Discretionary funding
Panel Recommendations • Be a leader in the national system • High performing center • Strong, stable state support • Strong in product development • Active and involved • Ned Ellington • Sharing our products and services • 360vu participation • Being a resource to other Centers
Panel Recommendations • Move forward rapidly with reorganization • Hired EDI Manager • Hired Center Manager • Redefined Service Regions • Hired Seven New Region Managers • Integrated Service Strategy – Shared goals • Improving our Metrics and Client Engagement processes • Improving our board structure
Panel Recommendations • Set forth a specific path for success • Great people • Common vision • Reaching high • Evaluating results • Constantly Improving
Panel Recommendations • Establish priorities for metrics • We embrace the Center in Good Standing Metrics as our measure of performance • Will add additional metrics relating to: • Impact • Visibility • Revenue
Panel Recommendations • Improve Key Processes • Work teams active in metric and client engagement processes • Results show our improvement • Improved survey response • Reduced customer dissatisfaction
Panel Recommendations • Balance our focus on market penetration, economic impact and/or revenue generation as our strategy • Larger, more significant projects • Higher impacts • Integrating our product lines, approaching our client more strategically
We Believe: • We’ve performed well • But we intend to do better • We have good systems • That we aim to continuously improve • We have great people • Who will continue to be our strength • We are a leader in the MEP network • And we’re looking to leverage this for our mutual benefit