2013 Legislative Session. HB 1106 / SB5707 – Net metering changes, including third party ownership HB 1977 – Allow utilities to participate in Renewable Cost Recovery Program HB 1301 – Replacement of Renewable Cost Recovery Program
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
HB 1106 / SB5707 – Net metering changes, including third party ownership
HB 1977 – Allow utilities to participate in Renewable Cost Recovery Program
HB 1301 – Replacement of Renewable Cost Recovery Program
HB 1634 – Allows the value of solar energy systems to increase property assessment
HB 1105 – Allow Non-Profits and Tribes to host Community Solar Projects
HB 1138 – Extend Renewable Cost Recovery Program to 2023
HB 1705 – Extend Sales & Use Tax Waivers for SHW to 2018
SB 5896 – Extend Sales & Use Tax Waivers for PV to 2017
SB 5802 – Created the Climate Legislative and Executive Workgroup
SB 5882 – Extend Sales & Use Tax Waivers for PV and SHW to 2018
The Utilities and Transportation Commission conducted an 18-month-long rulemaking to streamline interconnection of distributed electric generation.
By the time it concluded in June there were already about 100 TPO net metered systems in the state.
Utilities’ concern was that the TPO’s should be considered resellers of electricity and regulated as public service companies.
The Department of Revenue proposed some changes to WAC 458-20-273 including the payment of incentives to third party owners of PV systems that are leased to customers.
On Nov 12 there was a hearing that was well attended.
On Nov 21st we heard that DOR was considering dropping the lease idea.
On Jan 7th DOR confirmed that they will remove leasing from the changes.
Final draft of rulemaking is expected on Jan 15th.
Equitable allocation of costs among customers
o Utilities must have the discretion to develop rate design consistent with cost causation
o Utilities maintain the discretion to acquire distributed generation consistent with need and avoided cost
o Recognition of the value of utility grid
o Clear communication with customers about cost, value, role, responsibility and obligations
Local decision making
o Recognition of the different value and impacts of distributed generation based on utility-specific conditions
o Implementation through utility-specific programs and/or participation
System reliability and safety
o Provide for appropriate regulation to assure clarity about the responsibilities and obligations of third-party owners
o Ensure safety of utility workers and customers while providing a robust and reliable distribution system
o Ensure consistency with federal, state, and local requirements and responsibilities
Clearly stated objectives and analysis for legislative actions
o Robust economic analysis of the costs and alternatives to achieve objectives (e.g. GHG reductions, economic development)
o Decisions are informed by a comprehensive understanding of West Coast market impacts
The net metering cap in Seattle is 20 MW of PV capacity (SMC 21.49.082).
20 MW of PV in Seattle will produce roughly 20,000 MWh of electricity / year.
When we reach that cap, SCL revenues would be reduced by roughly $1.6M, or 0.24% of 2012 retail power revenues (at today’s rates).
In return, SCL would get 20,000 MWh of clean electricity, distributed without transmission losses, and with no generator maintenance costs.
As many utilities around the country try to quash NEM, a few have honestly tried to calculate what a site-generated MWh is worth; Austin Energy pegs it at $128. To a Nissan Leaf it is $307 (if gasoline is $3.46 / gal.)
As we work with stakeholders to craft a new state incentive program, net metering remains as a crucial mechanism for keeping program costs palatable and providing a way for our utilities to fairly compensate solar customer-generators.
2014 could be the year that we come to grips with the real Value of Solar energy.
HB 2176– Also known as Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride, would allow utilities and TPOs to lease or finance solar, mandate storage for net metered systems, among other things
HB 2185 – Includes $3M appropriation for solar energy research at UW
2SHB 1301? – Replacement of Renewable Cost Recovery Program
HB 2183 – Agenda for Joint Committee on Energy Supply and Conservation
HB 1634 – Adds the value of solar energy systems to new construction that can increase assessed property value
HB 2059 – Allows voluntary procurement of 500kW renewable energy systems by utility customers