The family of stars
Download
1 / 50

The Family of Stars - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 143 Views
  • Updated On :

0. The Family of Stars. Chapter 9. What we can measure directly: Surface temperature and color Spectrum Apparent magnitude or intensity Diameter of a few nearby stars Distance to nearby stars. Part 1: measuring and classifying the stars. What we usually cannot :

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The Family of Stars' - cady


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
The family of stars l.jpg

0

The Family of Stars

Chapter 9


Part 1 measuring and classifying the stars l.jpg

What we can measure directly:

Surface temperature and color

Spectrum

Apparent magnitude or intensity

Diameter of a few nearby stars

Distance to nearby stars

Part 1: measuring and classifying the stars

  • What we usually cannot:

    • Distance to most stars

    • Luminosity (energy radiated per

      second)

    • Diameter and mass


Surface temperature and color indices l.jpg
Surface temperature and color indices

Color filters

Color indices:

B-V, U-B

Differences in apparent magnitudes observed

through different filters


Spectral classification of stars l.jpg
Spectral Classification of Stars

Mnemonics to remember the spectral sequence:


How to find distances to the stars l.jpg

Parallax (only for stars within ~1500 ly)

From stellar motions

For moving clusters

Using “standard candles” (model-dependent)

Using mass-luminosity relation (for main-sequence stars) or period-luminosity relations (for binaries and variable stars; model-dependent)

How to find distances to the stars?


Slide6 l.jpg

When d is too large, angles A and B become too close to 900

The larger the baseline, the longer distances we can measure


Slide7 l.jpg

The longest baseline on Earth is our orbit!

Angular shift; we can measure it directly

Apparent shift in the position of the star: parallax effect


Slide8 l.jpg

Larger shift

Smaller shift

Effect is very small: shift is less than 1 arcsec even for

closest stars

Aristotle used the absence of observable parallax to discard heliocentric system


Slide9 l.jpg

Half of the angular shift is called parallax angle p and used to define new unit of distance


Slide10 l.jpg

The parallax angle p

Small-angle formula:

Define 1 parsec as a distance to a star whose parallax is 1 arcsec

1 pc = 206265 AU = 3.26 ly

d (in parsecs) = 1/p


The trigonometric parallax l.jpg
The Trigonometric Parallax

Example:

Nearest star, a Centauri, has a parallax of p = 0.76 arc seconds

d = 1/p = 1.3 pc = 4.3 LY

With ground-based telescopes, we can measure parallaxes p ≥ 0.02 arc sec

=> d ≤ 50 pc

With Hipparcos satellite: parallaxes up to 0.002 arcsec, i.e. d up to 500 pc.

118218 stars measured!


Proper motion l.jpg
Proper Motion

In addition to the periodic back-and-forth motion related to the trigonometric parallax, nearby stars also show continuous motions across the sky.

These are related to the actual motion of the stars throughout the Milky Way, and are called proper motion.


Slide13 l.jpg

Barnard’s star: highest proper motion

10 arcsec per year, or one lunar diameter per 173 yr

Approaches us at 160 km/sec

Fourth closest star


Brightness and distance l.jpg

Apparent magnitude: tells us how bright a star looks to our eyes

Brightness and distance

Intensity, or radiation flux received by the telescope: Energy of radiation coming through unit area of the mirror per second (J/m2/s)


Brightness and distance15 l.jpg

R eyes

d

Brightness and Distance

The flux received from the star is proportional to its intrinsic brightness or luminosity (L) and inversely proportional to the square of the distance (d):

L


Slide16 l.jpg

d eyes2

d1


Intrinsic brightness or luminosity l.jpg
Intrinsic Brightness, or luminosity eyes

The flux received from the star is proportional to its intrinsic brightness or luminosity (L) and inversely proportional to the square of the distance (d):

L

__

I =

4d2

Star A

Star B

Earth

Both stars may appear equally bright, although star A is intrinsically much brighter than star B.


Brightness and distance18 l.jpg
Brightness and Distance eyes

(SLIDESHOW MODE ONLY)


Slide19 l.jpg

Recall the definition of apparent magnitude: eyes

Define the magnitude scale so that two objects that differ by

5 magnitudes have an intensity ratio of 100.

Order of terms matters!


Slide20 l.jpg

However, the apparent magnitude mixes up the intrinsic brightness of the star (or luminosity) and the effect of distance (which has nothing to do with the luminosity of the star).

Inverse square law:


Distance and intrinsic brightness l.jpg

0 brightness of the star (or luminosity) and the effect of distance (which has nothing to do with the luminosity of the star).

Distance and Intrinsic Brightness

Example:

Recall that:

Betelgeuse

App. Magn. mV = 0.41

Rigel

For a magnitude difference of 0.41 – 0.14 = 0.27, we find an intensity ratio of (2.512)0.27 = 1.28

App. Magn. mV = 0.14


Distance and intrinsic brightness 2 l.jpg

0 brightness of the star (or luminosity) and the effect of distance (which has nothing to do with the luminosity of the star).

Distance and Intrinsic Brightness (2)

Rigel is appears 1.28 times brighter than Betelgeuse,

Betelgeuse

But Rigel is 1.6 times further away than Betelgeuse

Thus, Rigel is actually (intrinsically) 1.28*(1.6)2 = 3.3 times more luminous than Betelgeuse.

Rigel


Slide24 l.jpg

Absolute Magnitude brightness of the star (or luminosity) and the effect of distance (which has nothing to do with the luminosity of the star).

A star that is very bright in our sky could be bright primarily because it is very close to us (the Sun, for example), or because it is rather distant but is intrinsically very bright (Rigel, for example). It is the "true" (intrinsic) brightness, with the distance dependence factored out, that is of most interest to us as astronomers.

Therefore, it is useful to establish a convention whereby we can compare two stars on the same footing, without variations in brightness due to differing distances complicating the issue.

Astronomers define the absolute magnitude M to be the apparent magnitude that a star would have if it were (in our imagination) placed at a distance of 10 parsecs (which is 32.6 light years) from the Earth.

To determine the absolute magnitude M the distance to the star must also be known!


Absolute magnitude l.jpg
Absolute magnitude brightness of the star (or luminosity) and the effect of distance (which has nothing to do with the luminosity of the star).

Recall that for two stars 1 and 2

Let star 1 be at a distance d pc

and star 2 be the same star brought to the distance 10 pc.

Then

m2 = M

Inverse:


The distance modulus l.jpg

0 brightness of the star (or luminosity) and the effect of distance (which has nothing to do with the luminosity of the star).

The Distance Modulus

If we know a star’s absolute magnitude, we can infer its distance by comparing absolute and apparent magnitudes:

Distance Modulus

= mV – MV

= -5 + 5 log10(d [pc])

Distance in units of parsec

Equivalent:

d = 10(mV – MV + 5)/5 pc


Slide27 l.jpg

Absolute magnitudes of two different stars 1 and 2: brightness of the star (or luminosity) and the effect of distance (which has nothing to do with the luminosity of the star).

If two stars are at the same distance of 10 pc from the earth:


Absolute magnitude 2 l.jpg

0 brightness of the star (or luminosity) and the effect of distance (which has nothing to do with the luminosity of the star).

Absolute Magnitude (2)

Back to our example of Betelgeuse and Rigel:

Betelgeuse

Rigel

Difference in absolute magnitudes: 6.8 – 5.5 = 1.3

=> Luminosity ratio = (2.512)1.3 = 3.3


Slide29 l.jpg

Organizing the Family of Stars brightness of the star (or luminosity) and the effect of distance (which has nothing to do with the luminosity of the star).

We learned how to characterize stars with many different parameters

Is there any correlationbetween stellar

luminosities, radii, temperature, and masses???


The size radius of a star l.jpg
The Size (Radius) of a Star brightness of the star (or luminosity) and the effect of distance (which has nothing to do with the luminosity of the star).

We already know: flux increases with surface temperature (~ T4); hotter stars are brighter.

But luminosity also increases with size:

Star B will be brighter than star A.

A

B

Luminosity is proportional to radius squared, L ~ R2.

Quantitatively: L = 4 p R2s T4

Surface flux due to a blackbody spectrum

Surface area of the star


Example star radii l.jpg
Example: Star Radii brightness of the star (or luminosity) and the effect of distance (which has nothing to do with the luminosity of the star).

Polaris has just about the same spectral type (and thus surface temperature) as our sun, but it is 10,000 times brighter than our sun.

Thus, Polaris is 100 times larger than the sun.

This causes its luminosity to be 1002 = 10,000 times more than our sun’s.


Slide32 l.jpg

However, star radius is not a convenient parameter to use for classification, because it is not directly measured.

Surface temperature, or spectral class is more convenient!


Organizing the family of stars the hertzsprung russell diagram l.jpg
Organizing the Family of Stars: for classification, because it is not directly measured.The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram

We know:

Stars have different temperatures, different luminosities, and different sizes.

To bring some order into that zoo of different types of stars: organize them in a diagram of

Luminosity

Temperature (or spectral type)

versus

Absolute mag.

Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram

Luminosity

or

Temperature

Spectral type: O B A F G K M


Hertzsprung russell diagram l.jpg
Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram for classification, because it is not directly measured.

1911

1913

Betelgeuse

Rigel

Absolute magnitude

Sirius B

Color index, or spectral class


Slide37 l.jpg

Stars in the vicinity of the Sun for classification, because it is not directly measured.


Slide38 l.jpg

Stars in the vicinity of the Sun for classification, because it is not directly measured.


Slide39 l.jpg

90% of the stars are on the Main Sequence! for classification, because it is not directly measured.


Slide40 l.jpg

Check whether all stars are of the same radius: for classification, because it is not directly measured.

Total radiated power (luminosity) L = T4 4R2 J/s


Slide41 l.jpg

No, they are not of the same radius for classification, because it is not directly measured.


The radii of stars in the hertzsprung russell diagram l.jpg

0 for classification, because it is not directly measured.

The Radii of Stars in the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram

Betelgeuse

Rigel

10,000 times the sun’s radius

Polaris

100 times the sun’s radius

Sun

As large as the sun


Slide43 l.jpg

Majority of stars are here for classification, because it is not directly measured.

Specific segments of the main sequence are occupied

by stars of a specific mass


Slide44 l.jpg

The mass-luminosity relation for 192 stars in double-lined spectroscopic binary systems.

L ~ M3.5much stronger than inferred from L ~ R2 ~ M2/3


Slide45 l.jpg

However, this M spectroscopic binary systems. 3.5 dependence does not go forever:

Cutoff at masses > 100 M and < 0.08 M


Slide46 l.jpg

H-R diagram for nearby+bright stars: spectroscopic binary systems.

All stars visible to the naked eye + all stars within 25 pc