90 likes | 112 Views
Explore HRM performance assessment at LT.HRA startup in 2009, exchange practices, update KPIs, improve networking, and analyze tools. Emphasize European Commission and member states' contributions.
E N D
Measurement of HRM Performance LT HRA status
Context and main goals/ambitions at the startup of LT HRA in September 2009 (Stockholm) • Main goals: • to exchange good practices in the field of HRM assessment and analyze them in the light of their use in other Member States; • to raise awareness and knowledge about HRM performance assessment various models and tools; • to involve the HR practitioners and HR Managers at the national level in the co-operation with the EUPAN (HRWG) and hence to improve networking between the HR players; • to assess and update the indicators given in the study and/or to develop own indicators. • Participants • Belgium, France, Malta, Luxembourg, European Commission, Lithuania
LT HRA - results Collection of KPI’s from LT HRA and EUPAN-members • European Commission [16 KPI] • Belgium [20 KPI] • France [20 KPI] • Austria [8 KPI] • Malta [12 KPI] • Ireland [5 KPI] • Poland [2 KPI] • Lithuania [initial input]
European Commission –KPIs • Unit average staffing • Proportion of temporarystaff • Staff established after probation period • Job satisfaction • Ratio between staff at work and vacant posts • Training daysrealised • % of Training coursesattended • Training examinationspassed [languaguecourses] • Training evaluationspositive • Regularmobility • Vacanciesfilledafterpublication • Retention of staff • Retention of newstaff • Retention of keytalents • Proportion of women newly appointed or recruited into a senior/ a middle management function • Proportion of women among newly recruited staff (AD posts)
55 DG meeting • Booklet with collected KPI’s [+/- 80] • Call to action for all EUPAN-member states to contribute with KPI used in their countries administration • Invitation to work on common KPI definitions • E.g. ROI training, Absenteeism, …