1 / 18

US-TEC Target Users: Positioning and Navigation community

US-TEC Tim Fuller-Rowell, Eduardo Araujo-Pradere, Mike Husler, Mihail Codrescu NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center and CIRES University of Colorado. US-TEC Target Users: Positioning and Navigation community Collaboration between SWPC, NGS, FSL, and NGDC

Download Presentation

US-TEC Target Users: Positioning and Navigation community

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. US-TECTim Fuller-Rowell, Eduardo Araujo-Pradere, Mike Husler, Mihail CodrescuNOAA Space Weather Prediction Center and CIRES University of Colorado NOAA GPS Workshop

  2. US-TEC Target Users: • Positioning and Navigation community • Collaboration between SWPC, NGS, FSL, and NGDC • Kalman filter over CONUS + ground-based GPS data, IRI background model, solve for receiver biases • 15-minute cadence • 15 to 30 minute latency • 2 - 3 TEC unit accuracy (~34 - 48 cm delay at L1 frequencies) NOAA GPS Workshop

  3. Product on Web page:http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/ustec/http://www.sec.noaa.gov/ustec • Vertical TEC map over CONUS updated every 15 minutes • Estimated uncertainty in TEC • Location of current data sites • Difference from 10-day average to show recent trend • Data files: • vertical TEC • slant path TEC for each GPS satellite in view recent trend uncertainty NOAA GPS Workshop

  4. US-TEC Data Sources • NDGPS Coast Guard stations including inland sites via CORS/NGDC - dual data feed for reliability • GPS/MET sites ESRL Seth Gutman • IGS stations over Canada NOAA GPS Workshop

  5. Situational awareness:TEC Gradients Use information on TEC gradients to estimate time interval needed to record dual-frequency GPS data to achieve cm level positioning accuracy quiet ionospheric conditions small gradients, shorter intervals disturbed ionospheric conditions - steeper gradients, longer intervals NOAA GPS Workshop

  6. Slant-Path TEC Maps 2-D maps of of slant path TEC over the CONUS for each GPS satellite in view updated every 15 minutes A B Sat. 1 A B Sat. 14 C A B C A B C Sat. 29 Sat. 5 C ….etc Applications: 1. Ionospheric correction for single frequency GPS 2. Support dual-frequency integer ambiguity resolution for more rapid decimeter and centimeter accuracy positioning C NOAA GPS Workshop

  7. Differential Code and Phase NOAA GPS Workshop

  8. Kalman Filter Project state, x Project error covariance, P Compute Kalman gain, K, for observation matrix, H Update state estimate with observations, z Update error covariance NOAA GPS Workshop

  9. h EOF2 EOF1 EOF3 Electron density Empirical ortho-normal mapping functions NOAA GPS Workshop

  10. Inclusion of time evolution terms Significant (1TECU ) changes in the ionosphere can occur over 4 minutes Include terms in the state vector, x, for linear time changes Append terms to the observation matrix, H, Solving for time also allows extended data windows (1 hour) NOAA GPS Workshop

  11. NOAA GPS Workshop

  12. “Differential” Validation • Integrate through US-TEC model at two different times. • Compare directly to the phase difference in the original RINEX data file. • As time separation increases, errors in US-TEC map become uncorrelated and approach true uncertainty. NOAA GPS Workshop Araujo-Pradere et al. 2006

  13. US-TEC “Differential” Validation Slant path RMSE IRI US-TEC • Validation stations not included in assimilation process • Build up statistics every 5th day over 6 months • Daily average RMSE for each site NOAA GPS Workshop

  14. Validation Statistics: “differential” TEC 2.4 TEC units

  15. Absolute validation: FORTE Fast Onboard Recording of Transient Events satellite (Los Alamos, Abe Jacobson) • Phase or arrival time as function of frequency • Separate O and X traces • Fit to k/f2 dependence provides TEC estimate • Broad-band RF receiver 30-300 MHz at 800 km altitude • Designed to monitor lightning • Pulse transmitted from Los Alamos (simulated lightning) • Possible to estimate line-of-sight TEC between transmitter and FORTE satellite • Broad-band signal/receiver eliminates phase ambiguity so produces an “absolute” TEC estimate (uncertainty estimate is about 1 to 2 TEC units) • Issues are • bending of the rays, • plasmaspheric content, and having to • sub-sample US-TEC vertical domain Frequency Time of arrival NOAA GPS Workshop

  16. Comparison of FORTE and US-TEC NOAA GPS Workshop

  17. US-TEC Validation Summary Differential TEC: Slant = 2.4 TEC units Vertical = 1.7 TEC units “Absolute” FORTE ray tracing: Slant = 2.7 TEC units Vertical = 1.9 TEC units • Estimated US-TEC slant path total electron content uncertainty < 3 TEC units (equivalent to about 45 cm of signal delay at L1 frequencies) • Estimate US-TEC vertical total electron content uncertainty < 2 TEC units (equivalent to about 30 cm of signal delay at L1 frequencies) NOAA GPS Workshop

  18. US-TEC Future Plans…. • Add FAA and other stations over CONUS and Mexico • Short-term forecast (15 to 60 minutes) to bring up to, or just beyond, real-time • TEC gradients - situational awareness • Increase cadence to 5 minutes during storms • Develop multi-regional capability - partnerships • Global capability - ISES • Longer-term forecast - combining terrestrial and space weather NOAA GPS Workshop

More Related