1 / 20

Improving Transition Services through Personnel Preparation

Improving Transition Services through Personnel Preparation Michelle Parker-Katz and Lisa S. Cushing University of Illinois at Chicago Presentation at the annual meetings of the Teacher Education Division of the CEC, Grand Rapids, MI November 2012. Project SET: Transition is defined as.

bruis
Download Presentation

Improving Transition Services through Personnel Preparation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improving Transition Services through Personnel Preparation Michelle Parker-Katz and Lisa S. Cushing University of Illinois at Chicago Presentation at the annual meetings of the Teacher Education Division of the CEC, Grand Rapids, MI November 2012

  2. Project SET: Transition is defined as …the movement of students from school to adult life with a research-based focus on quality of life in the major areas of: Post-secondary education and/or training Employment Independent Living

  3. Need for Personnel Preparation A lack of special educators prepared with specific abilities in secondary transition to facilitate students’ successful movement from high school to adult life is a significant variable in poor adult outcomes for students with disabilities (Benitez, Morningstar, & Frey, 2009; Morningstar, Kim, & Clark, 2008; Blalock, Kochhar-Bryant, Test, Kohler, White, Lehmann, Bassett & Patton, 2003).

  4. Issues in Personnel Preparation for Transition The content of personnel training about transition is difficult to conceptualize and codify in that such knowledge is at the nexus of special education content, adult services content, career and vocational studies, and rehabilitation (Kim & Dymond, 2010; Kochhar-Bryant, 2003). Teachers less prepared to offer transition support in urban schools, moreover, often work with high concentrations of minority students living in poverty and attending the lowest performing schools (Pesky & Haycock, 2006). We lack a professional network that even loosely links community agencies with schools and universities (Adams & Dunn, 2004; Shaw, 2006).

  5. What is Project SET? • Five-year federal grant from U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs • Goal: prepare 56 highly qualified special educators to earn state of Illinois LBS2 certification as Transition Specialists • Outcome: personnel with knowledge about transition and leadership skills to improve transition services especially for high-need youth with disabilities and their families • How: three-fold process of 1) development of curriculum and program for personnel training, 2) development and building of a network of related personnel in schools, higher education, community, and state of Illinois, 3) evaluation and research about the goals and outcomes

  6. Project SET 2012 – 2017 Prepare 56 transition specialists in the following each year through this routine: Revise recruitment and admission as needed; build additional curriculum and program work by aligning national and state standards; admit each cohort to begin 3-sequence program in summer; graduate and entitle to the state certificate each summer after • Develop and present first annual Get Set Conference June 2013 - Begin year-long “Scholars in Residence” for early career support of transition specialists. Aim is to support all graduates through in-school and online work, and to prepare them to mentor the current SET cohort

  7. SET Personnel Training: Coursework **Scholars will participate in two additional semesters of “Specialists in Residency” which includes peer mentoring and on-the-job support**

  8. Community Conversations Dynamic networks of conversation and knowledge-sharing are focused on critical questions about a mutually important issue. Brown, J., Isaacs, D., World Café Community, Wheatley, M. J., & Senge, P. (2005). The World Café. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

  9. SET Community Conversations Organizing conversations with fellow school personnel, students, families, adult service agency personnel, community organizations, employers, and post-secondary education personnel to discuss topics such as: www.theworldcafe.com • How can we, as a community, increase, promote and support employment and self-employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities? • What steps can we take to develop a more collaborative, person-centered planning process? • How can we work together to create a collaborative team to explore/create links to provide community-based experiences for young adults in the 18-22 year old phase of transition to post-secondary life.

  10. SET Personnel Training: Cohort 1 Demographics

  11. SET Personnel Training: Cohort 1 Years Teaching

  12. SET Network: Building a sustainable network of relationships in Chicago and IL Higher Education Community Agencies/ State Organizations Schools

  13. Project SET Research

  14. Project SET Research

  15. SET Research Design and Methods • Surveys and Interviews (individual and focus groups) • Items drawn from IL State Standards for Transition Specialists, Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Transition Specialist Standards, Division on Career Development & Transition (DCDT) Transition Specialist Standards • All instruments will enable longitudinal collection of data over the five+ year period of Project SET. • Surveys being developed for community partners, and for students and their families of those candidates who complete Project SET. Interview protocols are developed for Project SET students and community agency personnel.

  16. June 2012 Baseline Data: Review • Illinois Competency Survey • There are a total of 47 competencies associated with 7 standards. • Standards and competencies incorporate Illinois State Standards, DCTC and CEC. • The survey is meant to be a self assessment of each competency. • Item responses used a 5-point Likert type scale (1 = “I have yet to learn about …” to 5 =demonstrates proficiency at the leadership level

  17. June 2012 Baseline Data: Review • Scholar Initial Interview (before entry into the program) • Four questions: What do you anticipate learning; any current challenges and/or barriers to doing transition in your setting(s); anticipate how participation in Project SET might impact work with students and families, anticipate how Project SET might impact partnerships with community stakeholders • Initial Analyses • What do you anticipate learning in Project SET that could help you build on what you do and meet your professional goals? • Enhance collaboration; provide better information to students, families, case managers; be an advocate for students; stronger and better advocate for students as they exit the high school setting; consider the curriculum and instruction that could lead to better outcomes; develop better IEP goals •  Participants see these sorts of needs in their knowledge and skills as well as in their work settings.

  18. Project SET: Further Information Project SET website at www.projectset.ed.uic.edu Tabs include: • Information about the program of study • Information about “Partners and Community Connections” • Events • Resources (national, state and local to Chicago • Publications and project research dissemination

  19. References Adams, C. L. & Dunn, R. (2005). The status of transition services for secondary students with disabilities in Illinois: Interagency coordinating council annual report for 2004-2005 to the governor and general assemble. Retrieved October 18, 2010 from http://www.isbe.net/iicc/pdf/2004-2005_annual_report.pdf. Benitez, D. T., Morningstar, M. E., & Frey, B. B. (2009). A multistate survey of special education teachers’ perceptions of their transition competencies. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32 (1), 6-16. Blalock, G., Kochhar-Bryant, C. A., Test, D. W., Kohler, P., White, W., Lehmann, J., Bassett, D., & Patton, J. (2003). The need for comprehensive personnel preparation in transition and career development: A position statement of the division on career development and transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 207-226. Kim, R. & Dymond, S.K. (2010). Special education teachers’ perceptions of benefits, barriers, and components of community-based vocational instruction. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48(5), 313–329. Kochhar-Bryant, C. (2003). Building transition capacity through personnel development: Analysis of 35 State Improvement Grants. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 161–184. Morningstar, M.E., Kim, K., Clark, G.M. (2008). Competencies of practitioners evaluating a transition personnel preparation program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31(1), 47 – 58. doi: 10.1177/088840640803100105 Pesky, H. G., & Haycock, K. (2006). Teaching inequality: How poor and minority students are shortchanged on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Education Trust. Shaw, S. (2006). Legal and policy perspectives on transition assessment and documentation. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 29(2), 108-113. doi: 10.1177/08857288060290020201

More Related