1 / 21

2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health Survey Executive Summary

2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health Survey Executive Summary. Consistent with US civilian Studies Year 2000 DoD Recruits overall are Healthier than their 1994 Counterparts: Decrease in Mean number of (D)ecayed surfaces. Decrease in Mean number of (M)issing teeth.

Download Presentation

2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health Survey Executive Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyExecutive Summary • Consistent with US civilian Studies Year 2000 DoD Recruits overall are Healthier than their 1994 Counterparts: • Decrease in Mean number of (D)ecayed surfaces. • Decrease in Mean number of (M)issing teeth. • Decrease in Mean number of (F)illed surfaces. • Decrease in number of Recruits PSR 3 or above.

  2. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyExecutive Summary (cont.) • Year 2000 Army Recruits compared to their 1994 Counterparts: • Virtually unchanged in Mean numbers of (D)ecayed surfaces and (M)issing teeth. • Decrease in Mean number of (F)illed surfaces. • Decrease in number of Recruits PSR 3 or above. • While projected per Recruit Means for DWV’s have decreased, seriousness (Class 3) of OS requirements have increased.

  3. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health Survey Year 1994 and 2000 Army Recruit Comparisons to the DoD on Significant Study Questions Study by the Tri-Service Center for Oral Heath Studies at USUHS

  4. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyConventions Used In This Summary • Significance has been calculated to the 99th percent. • A single or double Asterisk (*, **) will appear next to a value or item when statistically significant changes are noted. • A green arrow ( ) is often used to help identify findings of interest. • Tables of Mean Values will include the Confidence Interval in Brackets ( e.g.. Mean = 342.4 [313.2-371.6] ) • All values are subject to rounding in the summary charts and tables, calculations of significance were performed prior to any rounding to prevent errors. • All results were calculated using weighted values to insure true population representation by the samples.

  5. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health Survey Study Sample • For the DoD: 2711 Recruits were examined in 1994; while 4346 Recruits were examined in 2000. • For the Army: 535 Recruits were examined at Ft. Leonard Wood in 1994; for year 2000, examinations were performed at Ft. Jackson, Ft. Leonard Wood and Ft. Knox, with a total of 1672 Recruits being evaluated. • Demographics of Study Samples (race, gender, educational level, etc) were consistent with Recruit populations as a whole as reported by DMDC.

  6. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyDental Readiness • Significant INCREASE in percent of incoming 2000 Army Recruits in Dental Readiness Class 3 when compared to the 1994 Army Recruits. • No real change in 2000 DoD Recruits vs. 1994 DoD Recruits.

  7. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyMissing Teeth • Significant DECREASE in Percent of incoming 2000 Army Recruits with missing teeth compared to 1994 Army Recruits. • Significant DECREASE in the Percent of 2000 DoD Recruits with missing teeth compared to 1994 DoD Recruits.

  8. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyRestorations Needed Per Recruit • No significant change for incoming 2000 Army Recruits vs. 1994 Army Recruits. • 2000 DoD Recruits have significantly LOWER restorative needs compared to 1994 DoD Recruits.

  9. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyRestorations Needed Per Recruit (By Type) • No significant change for incoming 2000 Army Recruits vs. 1994 Army Recruits. • Significant decrease in mean number of 1&2 Surface Restorations required by 2000 DoD Recruits compared to 1994 DoD Recruits

  10. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyDental Readiness Classification Based Only On Restorative Needs No Significant Change

  11. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyPercent Distribution of Class 3 Teeth (Restorative) • Significant DECREASE in percent of 2000 Army Recruits who have 2 Class 3 Teeth compared to 1994 Army Recruits, but overall Class 3 Restorative intensity for Army Recruits is virtually unchanged. • Significant INCREASE in percent of 2000 DoD Recruits who have only 1 Class 3 Tooth compared to 1994 DoD Recruits.

  12. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyNumber of Teeth Requiring Extraction • Significant INCREASE in percent of 2000 Army Recruits who require 5 or More teeth extracted compared to 1994 Recruits. • Significant DECREASE in percent of 2000 DoD Recruits who require “No” or “1 to 2” teeth extracted, with a significant INCREASE in the percent requiring > 2 Teeth extracted when compared to the 1994 DoD Recruits.

  13. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyTypes of Extractions For Recruits With OS Treatment Needs • An INCREASE in the mean number of “Simple” extractions for 2000 Army Recruits is offset by equivalent DECREASES in “Complex” & “Impaction” extractions when comparing to the 1994 Army Recruits • INCREASES in the mean number of “Simple” & “Impaction” extractions for 2000 DoD Recruits were noted when comparing to 1994 DoD Recruits

  14. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyDental Readiness Classification Based Only On Oral Surgery Needs Note Significant INCREASE in Class 3 percentage

  15. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyPercent Distribution Of Recruits By PSR Code • Significant DECREASE in percent of 2000 Army Recruits with PSR Code 3 compared to 1994 Army Recruits • Significant DECREASE in percent of 2000 DoD Recruits with PSR Code 2 & 3 compared to 1994 DoD Recruits

  16. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyDental Readiness Classification Based Only On Periodontal Needs Note Significant Changes

  17. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyPeriodontal Sextant Readiness Classification • No Significant change for incoming 2000 Army Recruits vs. 1994 Army Recruits. • No change in 2000 DoD Recruits compared to 1994 DoD Recruits

  18. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyFixed Prosthodontic Needs • Significant DECREASE in percent of 2000 Army Recruits who require Fixed Pros Units compared to 1994 Army Recruits. • Similar significant DECREASE in percent of 2000 DoD Recruits who require Fixed Pros Units compared to 1994 DoD Recruits.

  19. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyEndodontic Needs • Significant DECREASE in percent of 2000 Army Recruits who require Endodontics compared to 1994 Army Recruits. • No Significant change in 2000 DoD Recruits compared to the 1994 DoD Recruits.

  20. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyPercent Distribution Of Endodontic Needs By Type

  21. 2000 Tri-Service Recruit Oral Health SurveyDWV’s By Discipline Note Significant changes

More Related