1 / 16

Automatic Photo Annotator

Automatic Photo Annotator. Bryan Klimt May 10, 2005. Photo Annotator. Photos must be labeled with keywords to enable effective search Hand labeling photos is a tedious process Automatic Photo Annotator labels incoming photos based on statistical learning

Download Presentation

Automatic Photo Annotator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Automatic Photo Annotator Bryan Klimt May 10, 2005

  2. Photo Annotator • Photos must be labeled with keywords to enable effective search • Hand labeling photos is a tedious process • Automatic Photo Annotator labels incoming photos based on statistical learning • Annotator then learns from user corrections

  3. Most common keywords • Colors or Patterns • sky, water, trees, cloud, hazy • People • bryan, amy, shyam • Locations • china, italy, pisa, tiantan, florence, firenze, beijing, lucca

  4. Types of Classifiers • Color-based methods • color histograms • cumulative color histograms • Face-based methods • Face detection • Face recognition • Time-based methods • k Nearest Neighbors

  5. Color-based Performance

  6. Cumulative Color

  7. Why does “color” fail? • Photos that are mislabeled (because the feature is not the focus of the photo). • Photos with similar color-patterns, but of completely different subjects.

  8. Hazy?

  9. Water?

  10. Face-based Performance

  11. Faces

  12. Faces?

  13. Time-based Results

  14. Final Results

  15. Conclusions • Time-based annotator performed best • Color-based annotator has inherent limits • Face-based annotator may become important with more training data

  16. Future Work • Hybrid Methods • Pattern-based annotators • Improving face recognizer with unlabeled data?

More Related