1 / 27

Luis Gustavo G de Goncalves NASA-GSFC/UMD-ESSIC INPE-CPTEC

Assessing the South American Land Data Assimilation System (SALDAS) Datasets for the LBA Model Intercomparison Project (LBA-MIP). Luis Gustavo G de Goncalves NASA-GSFC/UMD-ESSIC INPE-CPTEC

brody
Download Presentation

Luis Gustavo G de Goncalves NASA-GSFC/UMD-ESSIC INPE-CPTEC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessing the South American Land Data Assimilation System (SALDAS) Datasets for the LBA Model Intercomparison Project (LBA-MIP) Luis Gustavo G de Goncalves NASA-GSFC/UMD-ESSIC INPE-CPTEC Joao de Mattos, Dirceu Herdies, Juan Ceballos, Daniel Vila, Jim Shuttleworth, Dave Toll, Natalia Coupe, Scott Saleska

  2. Background • The LBA Model Intercomparison Project (LBA-MIP) • The South American Land Data Assimilation System (SALDAS) Forcing Datasets • SALDAS x LBA sites validation

  3. LBA-MIP Key questions • How does a comprehensive suite of models simulate vegetation function (especially carbon and water fluxes) across different sites, and in response to seasonal and interannual climatic variations? What are the different modeling approaches, mechanisms, and/or sensitivities that cause different models to behave differently? • How do model simulations compare to observations through time and across sites? • 3) Can observations be used to improve comprehensive models, revise our predictions of the fate of Amazonian forests, and their impact on global carbon cycling, under a changing climate? • Responds directly to the LBA-ECO Phase 3 “Synthesis and Integration” • Leverage from previous PILPS and MIP experience • The goalis to gain comparative understanding of ecosystem models that simulate energy, water and CO2 fluxes over the LBA area. • The taskis to subject all the models to the same forcing and experimental protocol, and compare the output. • Perform model intercomparison in 2 phases: • Single point comparison (LBA sites) • Regional comparison (model derived gridded datasets)

  4. LBA-MIP Obejctives • Acquire meteorological data from a network of eddy flux towers in the Brazilian Amazon, to provide a consistently filled continuous dataset for driving models. • Use data to drive a suit of models. • Compare simulation behavior across models. • Use the flux observations to test and improve vegetation models of Amazonian carbon and water cycling, for application to projections of climate effects on Amazonian forests. • LBA-DMIP, phase 2: Spatially continuous simulations. Focusing on ecosystem land-vegetation models that are embedded in global-scale coupled GCMs (i) drive a suite of models with spatially continuous meteorological fields; (ii) test outputs with observation data products; and (iii) use the results to improve models which may then be used make a new suite predictions for the future of Amazon forests under climate change.

  5. LBA-MIP Participant Models and Experiments

  6. LBA-MIP II South American Gridded Datasets • Preferably Reanalysis due to the larger number of observations relative to operational models • NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis 2 and ECMWF ERA40: global, low temporal and spatial resolution • CPTEC SARR (South American Regional Reanalysis): 40 Km, 6 hourly: Data derived using the modified version of the Eta model (Chou and Herdies, 1996) and the Regional Physical-space Statistical Analysis System (RPSAS) data assimilation scheme applied at 40Km horizontal resolution and 38 vertical levels. This system integrates upper air and surface observations from several sources over South America, including vertical soundings from the RACCI/LBA and SALLJEX field campaigns over the Amazon and the low-level jet regions along the Andes, respectively.

  7. LSM Atmospheric Forcing Data • Quality of land surface model (LSM) output is closely tied to the quality of the meteorological forcing data used to drive the model • SALDAS project seeks to provide accurate, near-real-time and retrospective land surface states over South America • Model and observation-based data used to create high-quality atmospheric forcing datasets • Retrospective (2000-2004, CPTEC) • Real-time (2002-Present, CPTEC)

  8. Forcing Data Specifics • 3-Hourly files • 1/8th Degree (~12.5 km) over Equator • GRIB format • C-shell scripts, Fortran programs used to automatically generate and archive forcing • Quality controlled, adjusted for terrain height • 15 Model and observation-based fields SALDAS Domain

  9. Atmospheric Forcing Fields • Model-Based Estimates of Standard Climate Station Data • Temperature ( 2 m assuming grass) • Specific Humidity ( 2 m assuming grass) • U East-West Wind Component (10 m assuming grass) • V North-South Wind Component (10 m assuming grass) • Surface Pressure ( 0 m assuming grass) • Observation-Based Data • Downward Shortwave Radiation • Precipitation

  10. Atmospheric Forcing Fields • Model-Based Estimates of Above Ground Data • Temperature • Specific Humidity • U East-West Wind Component • V North-South Wind Component • Surface Pressure • Downward Longwave Radiation • Height, h, above ground at which data applies • Altitude assumed for location • ETA coordinate represents topography as steps

  11. Terrain Height Adjustment • ETA temperature, pressure, humidity and longwave radiation adjusted for differences in ETA versus LDAS terrain height • Temperature and pressure corrected using standard lapse rate • Specific humidity and longwave radiation corrected by holding relative humidity constant

  12. Observations • Model-based data subject to model error, so observations used when possible • Radiation • GOES-CPTEC downward shortwave • GOES-CPTEC PAR (not implemented yet) • GOES-CPTEC skin temperature (not implemented yet) • Precipitation • TRMM 3B42 • GPCC + CPTEC/INMET surface observations

  13. + = Observed Radiation • GOES data processed at CPTEC/DSA (Divisao de Satelites Ambientais: Environmental Satellites Division) to create 1/25 degree, hourly, instantaneous surface downward shortwave radiation, PAR and skin temperature fields • Interpolated to 1/8th degree • GOES shortwave radiation is zenith angle corrected, used in place of ETA data when possible GL 1.2 GOES downward shortwave radiation (W/m2) SARR downward shortwave radiation (W/m2) Merged SALDAS downward shortwave radiation (W/m2)

  14. Precipitation Temporal Disaggregation Process • Description: Use of rain gauge to correct satellite bias precipitation • Spatial Resolution: 0.25 degree • Temporal Resolution: total daily precipitation • Domain: South America • Methodology: Use TRMM sub-daily precipitation pulses to dissagregate the total daily amounts. • Make use of TRMM and raingauges analysis data to form best available product—a temporally disaggregated 3-hourly value • Note: • 3B42RT data used to derive temporal disaggregation weights • Sum of hourly data values equals original total daily TRMM/gauge

  15. SALDAS x LBA Validation

  16. SALDAS x LBA Validation

  17. SALDAS x LBA Validation Pressure, Temperature, Humid and Wind

  18. SALDAS x LBA Validation Precipitation

  19. SALDAS x LBA Validation Precipitation

  20. SALDAS x LBA Validation Precipitation

  21. SALDAS x LBA Validation Precipitation

  22. SALDAS x LBA Validation Precipitation

  23. SALDAS x LBA Validation Radiation Bias increases with magnitude SWDown SWDown

  24. Forcing Data Archive SALDAS Retrospective 3-Hourly SALDAS Real Time Hourly SARR 3 Hourly ODAS 6 Hourly DSA/GOES Hourly TRMM/Gauge Precip 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 General Data Radiation Precipitation

  25. Conclusions • Model and observation based data merged to create robust, accurate 1/8th degree 3-hourly forcing data set • CPTEC-SARR/ODAS/ETA data serves as base • CPTEC-DSA/GOES, TRMM/raingauge data used to augment data set • Common set of forcing integral to SALDAS LSM intercomparisons (NOAH,SiB3,SSiB…LBA-MIP) • Five years archived, with continuing production • Validation effort proceeding

  26. Conclusions • Current SARR based forcing need improvement over LBA region based upon tower observations: • Surf Pressure average errors up to 25 hPa (K67) • Specific humidity errors up to -0.42 g/Kg • Shortwave downward radiation average errors up to 8.5 W/m2 over the region (Std=23 W/m2) • Temperature average errors up to 2.5 K (BAN) • SALDAS precipitation underestimates in most of the sites and seasons • SALDAS lower number of precipitation events higher than 20mm/3hrs relative to LBA

  27. More Info… • LBA-MIP • http://climatemodeling.org/lba-mip • “Modeleres” are welcome!! • South American LDAS Atmospheric Forcing Datasets • Atmospheric Forcing Datasets: • LBA/DIS Beija-Flor Keyword = “SALDAS” • SALDAS Webpage: • http://ldas.gsfc.nasa.gov/SALDAS

More Related