30 likes | 107 Views
Exploring the pros and cons of lowering the voting age to 18, citing concerns about youth's sense of responsibility and benefits of increased participation in democracy. The debate also discusses the impact on education, family responsibility, and overall maturity level. Should the voting age remain at 18 or be raised for a more responsible electorate?
E N D
In favour • At the age of 18 youth have no idea of responsibility towards democracy. • Reduction of voting age to 18 is a way of increasing the number of voters but by this way we can’t improve the quality of our democracy. • Immature and dependent people are carried away by unrealistic promises in rural area where people are simple honest but can be misled and duped easily. • Reduction of age to 18 for voting automatically draw students to politics. This education will be affected. • Our elders should bear this responsibility and ask the youth to share this responsibility when is mature at the age of 21.
Against • Students are already involved in politics of students union, their participation in election will make them responsible. • A girl is permitted to marry at the age of 18. If it is considered good enough for family responsibility then why can’t it be good for a responsible voter. • There is need to involve greater number of people in formation of a government in democracy. • It is not harmful because maturity level of mass has increased due to general awareness.