1 / 11

Using international security research networks: the Global Futures Forum

Using international security research networks: the Global Futures Forum. Jean-Louis Tiernan Sr. Coordinator, Academic Outreach Canadian Security Intelligence Service. What the GFF is. Foresight. Global knowledge network Launched by Canada and the U.S Driven by governments

brilliant
Download Presentation

Using international security research networks: the Global Futures Forum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using international security research networks:the Global Futures Forum Jean-Louis Tiernan Sr. Coordinator, Academic Outreach Canadian Security Intelligence Service

  2. What the GFF is Foresight • Global knowledge network • Launched by Canada and the U.S • Driven by governments • Involves over 40 countries • Serves security and intelligence • Steers clear of policy prescriptions • Examines transnational security issues Research Expert outreach

  3. What the GFF does To reap the benefits of networked collaboration for intelligence analysis, the GFF: • Tests current thinking, challenges analytic assumptions, widens the range of considered outcomes, and discovers questions that are not being asked; • Complements traditional intelligence analysis by creating a context to interpret classified information; • Generates collaborative insights and early warning of potential threats and opportunities that might go unrecognised by relying solely on traditional intelligence; • Enables rapid learning through real-time exchanges; • Encourages the sharing, co-creation, and integration of new analytic methodologies; • Creates non-traditional linkages among governments, academe, think-tanks and business.

  4. GFF and traditional intelligence Complementarity

  5. An evolving idea: history of the GFF The GFF is the outcome of international conferences: Singapore 2010 Prague 2006 Rome 2004 Washington 2005 Vancouver 2008

  6. How it works The General Meetings • The international conferences which led to the GFF have become interactive meeting points for the global analytic community. Hosted by a different country every year, the annual meeting, likened by some to a “mini Davos of analysis”, sets the direction of the GFF for the year ahead. It also provides a platform to examine emerging issues. Communities of interest and other substantive activities • Communities of interest (COIs), led and developed by various countries, meet between the annual meetings to discuss specific global security issues. Existing and past COIs have looked into: radicalisation, global disease, illicit trafficking, social networks, technological surprise, genocide prevention, proliferation, the practise and organisation of intelligence, economic security and strategic foresight and warning. On-line collaboration • Between face-to-face meetings, the current 1500 individual members use the password-protected site to share resources and exchange using blogs, discussion forums, wikis, etc.

  7. Role of CSIS and Canada’s place • Plans and develops the participation of Canada’s S&I community in the Forum; • Chairs informal national advisory group (PCO, CSIS, DND, CBSA, DFAIT, RCMP) to co-ordinate input; • Supports our U.S. intelligence partners in developing and expanding the Forum globally; • Sets Canadian position on governance issues; • Chairs GFF Steering Group; • Serves as strategic facilitator: Canada now most active member country.

  8. Results so far Contents point of view • Community of interest on radicalisation (Meech Lake, Brussels, Ottawa, The Hague, Singapore). Those have allowed the community to understand an issue characterised by an extreme case of information overflow. • Innovative methodologies to explore trends in radicalisation were used, including alternative scenarios. • Systems model to understand the linkages between actors and motivations in illicit trafficking (small arms, drugs, humans). Process point of view • “Early signals”: As a result of Canada’s involvement, rehearsed professional networks are now in place and can be relied on to receive updates from various capitals or research centres. • Vancouver 2008: Canada emerges as an innovator in intelligence. • Significant boost to launch CSIS Academic Outreach program in 2008.

  9. What next? Some upcoming activities • Making foresight “actionable” (U.S.) – 18-19 March • Prosperity and Security: the Challenges of Uncertain Economic Times (Canada) – 8 March and 15 April • Practise and organisation of intelligence (Denmark) – 20-22 June • Practise and organisation of intelligence (Switzerland) – early 2011 • Food security (Canada) – early 2011

  10. Some lessons learned Making networks work? Foresight is important can be discredited easily with bad planning Identify your needs as government Manage your expectations; set goals Star small and use precise focus Use GFF as an entrepreneurial lab

  11. Becoming involved www.globalfuturesforum.org Janelle Boucher boucherja@smtp.gc.ca Jean-Louis Tiernan tiernanj@smtp.gc.ca

More Related