790 likes | 935 Views
Some results obtained at RHIC. Anatoly Litvinenko. litvin@moonhe.jinr.ru. Outline. Introduction RHIC. Short introdaction Why we study nuclei-nuclei collisions? A few definitions. What can we expect from theory Properties of produced hadronic matter (observables)
E N D
Some results obtained at RHIC Anatoly Litvinenko litvin@moonhe.jinr.ru
Outline. • Introduction • RHIC. Short introdaction • Why we study nuclei-nuclei collisions? • A few definitions. • What can we expect from theory • Properties of produced hadronic matter (observables) • Energy density • equilibration time (elliptic flow) • jet qenching • Resonances melting (Debye scrinig) • Conclusions
2 rings, 3.8 km circumference. Polarized p and Nucleus up to Au. Top energies (each beam): 100 GeV/nucleon Au-Au. 250 GeV polarized p-p. NIM, v.499, p. 235-880, (2003)
Why the collisons of heavy nuclei is interesting? Let us see on the space – time picture of collision pre-collision QGP (?) and parton production hadron reinteraction hadron production QCD phase diagram
Rough estimation – ideal mass less gas Bosons -- 1- degree of freedom: Fermions -- 1- degree of freedom: 2 quarks 3 quarks
Qualitative Lattice QCD F. Karsch, Lecture Notes in Physics 583 (2002) 209.
Questions to be answered (experiment) • What is the value of energy density? • If the statistical equilibration is achieved? • Observables and hadronic matter properties.
Rapidity Lorens boost Pseudorapidity Transverse mass
Stopping power Net baryons distribution
Stopping power 73 ± 6GeV / nucleon
b 2R ~ 15 fm Centrality determination Participant Region Spectators Spectators Peripheral collisoin, b 2R Central collision, b = 0
Centrality classification Geometrical cross section • Value of impact parameter • In percent from the geometrical cross section Centrality Corresponds to the region impact parameter
Spectator distribution for different centrality ZDC – Zero Degree Calorimeter
QUESTION I Can we achieved enough energy density in nuclei-nuclei collisions ? Can we make some conclusion about from experiment?
Energy density and Bjorken equation Historically energy density was estimated using final for
Energy density but crossing time For and Energy density is determined using final state
QUESTION I Can we achieved enough energy density in nuclei-nuclei collisions ? Can we make some conclusion about from experiment? Yes! Bjorken equation
QUESTION II Is equilibrium state of hot and dense hadronic matter achieved? What is conclusions about from experiment?
The answer is not evident. Asymptotic freedom Big equilibration time Small coupling constant High energy density
elliptic flow Elliptic flow Space eccentricity Coordinate space asymmetry momentum space anisotropy
Elliptic flow • For big value of elliptic flow you need save space anisotropy for a long enough time • The value of elliptic flow is sensitive to the Equation of State (EoS) Importance of elliptic flow • Give information about equilibration time • Give information about EoS On the next slides shown how ensemble of free streaming particles lost space eccentricity
Sensitivity to nuclear EoS Science, Vol 298, Issue 5598, 1592-1596, 22 November 2002Determination of the Equation of State of Dense Matter Pawel Danielewicz, Roy Lacey, William G. Lynch Directed Flow: Elliptic flow:
QUESTION II Is equilibrium state of hot and dense hadronic matter achieved? What is conclusions about from experiment? The strong indication that YES.
Some designations It is not reasons to expect strong changes in observables because the transition is crossover Commonly accepted: sQGP for strongly-interacting Quark-Gluon Plasma QGP, pQGP,wQGP for weakly-interacting Quark-Gluon Plasma
Observables and space time structure of Heavy ion collisions
Observables and space time structure of Heavy ion collisions • Production of hard particles: • jets • heavy quarks • direct photons • Calculable with the tools of perturbative QCD
Observables and space time structure of Heavy ion collisions • Production of semi-hard particles: • gluons, light quarks • relatively small momentum: • make up for most of the multilplicity
Observables and space time structure of Heavy ion collisions • Thermalization • experiment suggest a fast thermalization (remember elliptic flow) • but this is still not undestood from QCD
Observables and space time structure of Heavy ion collisions • Quark gluon plasma
Observables and space time structure of Heavy ion collisions • Hot hadron gas
Particle ratio and statistical models • One assumes that particles are produced by a thermalizedsystem with temperature T and baryon chemical potential • The number of particles of mass mper unit volume is : These models reproduce the ratios of particle yields withonly two parameters
One more observable. Particle ratios N/p ratio shows baryons enhanced for pT < 5 GeV/c
JET Quenching Jet: A localized collection of hadrons which come from a fragmenting parton Modification of Jet property in AA collisions because partons propagating in colored matter lose energy. One of the possible observable The suppression of the high- hadrons In AA collisions Was predicted in a lot of works. Some of them (not all) are: • J.D.Bjorken (1982), Fermilab – PUB – 82 – 059 - THY. • M.Gyulassy and M.Palmer, Phys.Lett.,B243,432,1990. • X.-N.Wang, M.Gyulassy and M.Palmer, Phys.Rev.,D51,3436,1995. • R.Baier et al., Phys.Lett.,B243,432,1997. • R.Baier et al., Nucl.Phys.,A661,205,1999
High pT (> ~2.0 GeV/c) hadrons in NN h d A Parton distribution functions a b c Hard-scattering cross-section B h Fragmentation Function
High pT (> ~2.0 GeV/c) hadrons in NN h d A Parton distribution functions a b c Hard-scattering cross-section B h Fragmentation Function
Suppression of high-pt hadrons. Qualitatively. Nuclear modification factor From naive picture is what we get divided by what we expect.
First data in first RHIC RUN Jet Quenching ! Great! But (see the next slide)
Nuclear modifications to hard scattering Large Cronin effect at SPS and ISR Suppression at RHIC Is the suppression due to the medium? (initial or final state effect?)