1 / 37

Seep Tents Masters Project

Bren School of Environmental Science & Management. Seep Tents Masters Project. External Review. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management. Group Members. Group Project Manager—Erin Mayberry Secretary/Recorder—Wendy Stanford Treasurer—Farah Shamszadeh Data Manager—Ali Ger

brian
Download Presentation

Seep Tents Masters Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Seep Tents Masters Project External Review

  2. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Group Members • Group Project Manager—Erin Mayberry • Secretary/Recorder—Wendy Stanford • Treasurer—Farah Shamszadeh • Data Manager—Ali Ger • Client Contact—Misty Gonzales

  3. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Advisors • Faculty Advisors: • Christopher Costello • Natalie Mahowald • Project Advisor: • Mel Willis

  4. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Background • Natural gas and oil seep from the ocean floor in the Santa Barbara Channel • In 1982, ARCO installed 2 concrete and steel pyramids to capture the gas • These are the only tents in the world • The tents are currently operated by Venoco, Inc.

  5. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Background • Gas emitted is mostly methane • The seeps are considered a natural source of air pollution in the county • The Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District is exploring additional seep tents as a method to reduce methane emissions

  6. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Problem Statement • Is it environmentally advantageous to install additional seep tents to capture naturally released hydrocarbons? Further, is it economically and legally feasible to install additional seep tents?

  7. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: study area Maps courtesy of the UCSB Hydrocarbon Seeps Project http://seeps.geol.ucsb.edu/ Area studied by the UCSB Hydrocarbon Seeps Research Group

  8. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: study area • Water quality impact area • Same area as geologic study • Air quality and health impact area • Santa Barbara County, CA • Both will have specific section in final document on potential impacts outside of study area

  9. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: study area • Terrestrial impact area • Scenario 1: Assume project will use Venoco’s existing facilities • Assessment of impact of increased production levels at Venoco • Scenario 2: Engineering data from APCD include separate processing or co-generation facilities • Evaluate impacts in addition to Scenario 1

  10. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: geology • UCSB Hydrocarbon Seeps Project • Reservoir (?) • Flux (?) • Natural variation (?) • Final analysis will include low, medium, and high estimates

  11. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: seep tents • Size, number, materials and structure, placement: • Scenario 1: Determined by the results of the A.D. Little engineering estimate ordered by the APCD • Scenario 2: These data are not available. We assume that the project will duplicate the 1982 ARCO project. Design will be updated if possible.

  12. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: use of the gas • Who will use the captured gas? • Scenario 1: Gas will be sold openly on the market • Scenario 2: Venoco will contract to sell the gas exclusively to UCSB

  13. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: use of the gas • How will the captured gas be used? • Scenario 1: Gas is sold on the market, used for either heat or electricity • Scenario 2: Gas is sold to UCSB • To eliminate the need for an additional electricity generation facility, we assume the gas will be used for heating only • Scenario 3: Gas is sold to UCSB • Engineering report includes co-generation facility, gas used for heating and electricity

  14. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: use of the gas • How will the gas be processed? • Assume it is not feasible to construct a new facility to process the gas • Assume the gas will be cleaned using the processing facilities available at Venoco, Inc.’s Ellwood Onshore Facility

  15. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: use of the gas • Which pipelines will be used? • Existing pipelines from ARCO tents will be used • New tents will tap into the existing pipelines • (?) Can existing pipelines accept the increased capacity of the new tents? If not, will pipelines need to be built?

  16. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: use of the gas • How will the gas be transported to the user? • Gas will be transported via existing infrastructure

  17. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: ownership • Who legally owns the captured gas? • The gas is not fugitive gas • Owned by lessee

  18. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: planning period • When would the tents be implemented? • How long would it take to finance, get permits for, engineer, build and implement the tents? • Plan to get data from engineering study or original ARCO seep tents Environmental Impact Statement

  19. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Critical Assumptions: planning period • What is the useful life of the seep tents? • What is the life of the seeps? • Data from UCSB Hydrocarbon Seeps research group • What is the life of the tents? • Data from engineering study or original ARCO EIS

  20. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Areas of Research • Four areas of research: • Economic feasibility study (Wendy) • Legal feasibility study (Farah) • Water quality & ecologic impact study (Ali) • Air quality & climate impact study (Misty)

  21. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research II: economic feasibility • Calculate the Net Present Value of future gas sales for the next 20 years • Discover the processing sequence of the gas • Determine at what point gas is sold • Discover who has been gaining revenue from gas sales • Construct time series of past revenues • Determine the potential amount of gas captured by seep tents • Calculate potential future sales revenues of gas for the next 20 years • Perform Monte Carlo Sensitivity Analysis

  22. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research II: economic feasibility • Technology Costs • Determine what the existing infrastructure is that supports the collection and processing of seep gases • Determine whether new tents will tie into existing infrastructure or will require additional supporting construction • Estimate engineering costs of construction of seep tents • Estimate fixed costs of installation of seep tents • Discover past maintenance costs of seep tents and infrastructure • Estimate future costs of maintenance of seep tents • Estimate future costs of potential new infrastructure

  23. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research II: economic feasibility • Legal and Permitting Costs • Determine permitting fees • Estimate potential fines • Determine the value of potential emissions reduction credits

  24. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research III: legal feasibility • Objective: recommendations for the project to be consistent with applicable regulations • In the lifetime of the project there will be 4 phases: • Phase 1: Construction • Phase 2: Operation • Phase 3: Maintenance • Phase 4: Abandonment

  25. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research III: legal feasibility • Data collection • What are the federal, state and local agencies that regulate each phase of the project? • Source: Santa Barbara County Clerks’ Office • For each agency, what are the applicable policies and regulations? • Source: Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe/ Legal Research Database

  26. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research III: legal feasibility • Analysis • Is each phase of the project consistent with these policies and regulations? • If inconsistent, what are the policy and regulatory constraints on: 1. The site 2. The design 3. The operation

  27. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research IV: marine impacts • Goal: To develop a qualitative model that will predict the water quality and related marine ecology impacts of possible seep tent installation • Objectives: • Determine the fate and transport of the seep hydrocarbons • Determine present state of the seep ecology • Gather data about the measured impacts of the ARCO tents • Use the information above as inputs to predict likely impacts of new seep tent installations using the selected scenario

  28. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research IV: marine impacts • Ecology and environmental nature of the seeps • What are the surface, long shore and subsurface currents? • How do these currents affect the fate and transport of the seep hydrocarbons in the water column? • How do the hydrocarbons biodegrade? • What is the seep ecology? • What is the species composition and abundance compared to non-seep sites?

  29. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research IV: marine impacts • Impacts of seep tents on the marine ecology and water quality • Impacts of the ARCO tents? • Most likely ways that the seeps tents alter benthic ecology? • Links between the benthos and pelagic ecology? • What are the likely water quality impacts of additional seep tents? • Will there be a detectable impact of the tents on selected hydrocarbons concentrations? • How much will the tents reduce the total seep gas emissions into the atmosphere?

  30. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research V: air quality & climate • Quantify total volume of VOCs and compare them to other natural sources by obtaining information from the SBCAPCD and UCSB • What types of gas are released? • What is the area of the seepage at the surface? • What is the flux of gas from the surface? • What are other natural sources of VOCs? • What is the total quantity of other natural sources?

  31. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research V: air quality & climate • Review ozone concentrations in the county • What are the processes of ozone production? • What are typical ozone concentrations in SB throughout the seasons? • What environmental factors contribute to ozone production?

  32. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research V: air quality & climate • Determine the overall contribution of methane to global greenhouse gases emitted from the seeps using data from UCSB Geology Department • How much methane is emitted from the surface? • What is the global balance for methane? • Global Warming Potential • IPCC (impact on radiation)

  33. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research V: air quality & climate • Compare current ozone levels with estimated new levels from reduced geogenic emissions due to capture by the seep tents • Urban Airshed Model (from EPA) • Install model • Run model • Confirm that model accounts for mobile sources

  34. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research V: air quality & climate • Calculate potential impacts of VOC reductions due to tenting of geogenic sources • How much will VOCs be reduced by tenting? • How will this effect ozone production? • How will this effect county ozone levels?

  35. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Research V: air quality & climate • Estimate amount of air toxics released from the seeps • What is the flux of toluene and benzene? • What are the health risks associated with these air toxics? • What are the relative sources of these toxics in the county emissions inventory? • Determine ARCO's calculations of emissions from the seeps

  36. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Final Project Report • We will deliver a final document detailing our findings by April, 2002 • The report could be used for public review of the possible seeps tents development project

  37. Questions? Thank you for your feedback

More Related