760 likes | 1.13k Views
Explore the transformative potential of telemedicine in stroke care delivery, as outlined by Dr. Tzu-Ching Wu, a renowned neurologist. Discover the key functionalities, benefits, and future prospects of teleneurology/telestroke networks. Understand why telemedicine is crucial in addressing the acute treatment of ischemic strokes and the shortage of neurologists. Learn about the innovative telestroke network models and the UT Teleneurology Program, aimed at enhancing patient care, reducing unnecessary transfers, and providing expert neurological consultations. Gain insights into the activation process of teleneurology and its role in expediting critical care for stroke patients.
E N D
Telemedicine:Transforming the Delivery of Stroke Care Tzu-Ching (Teddy) Wu, MD Associate Professor of Neurology Director of Teleneurology
Disclosure: Tzu-Ching Wu, M.D. • Dr. Tzu-Ching Wu, has no relevant financial interests to disclose
Objectives • Identify the functionality and benefits that telemedicine technology can offer to providers and patients • Review the nuts and bolts of a teleneurology/telestroke network • Discuss the keys to success • Discuss the future of teleneurology
What is Telemedicine? • “Telemedicine” term coined by Thomas Bird in 1970’s, “healing at a distance” • Telemedicine: the use of telecommunications technologies to provide medical information and services • Telephone • Fax • Email • Mobile devices/apps • Store Forward (Asynchronous) • Interactive real-time audio/video streams • Used for Telestroke/Teleneurology • Synchronous
Why is Teleneurology/Telestroke Needed? • Stroke is the fifth leading cause of death in the United States and second leading cause of death worldwide • Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disabilityin the United States • Acute ischemic stroke is a treatable disease • IV t-PA is still the only proven medical therapy for acute ischemic stroke • Narrow time window, risk of hemorrhagic conversion • (NNT 1 in 8 for near normal, 1 in 3 will improve) • Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy (IAT) recently shown to improved outcomes in certain acute ischemic stroke patients. NNT = 1 in 4 • Both treatments need to be delivered fast in order to be effective • IV t-PA under-utilized / Access to IAT
Why is Teleneurology/Telestroke Needed? • Currently ~800,000 stroke cases per year and with the aging population, incidence likely to double by 2050 • Shortage of neurologist (11%19% by 2025), including vascular neurologists • Declining number of neurologist taking hospital call and inpatient consultation • Lack to access to acute stroke expertise • Emergency room physician uncertain about administering IV t-PA without guidance from neurologist; rapidly evolving treatments with IA • Disparities in acute stroke care for rural populations • Ten times less likely to receive IV t-PA when compared to urban hospitals • Texas has one of the largest rural populations
How? • Neurologists • Technology • Audio/Video • Broadband access • PACS
Telestroke Network Model Hub(s) and Spoke • Third Party “doc in box”
Telestroke Coverage Model • Provide stroke coverage in remote hospitals that lack neurology presence • More difficult to attract neurologist to smaller markets, even more difficult for vascular trained neurologist • Hard to maintain call schedule with only a few neurologist • Provide adjunctive coverage in remote hospitals with local neurology practices/hospitalists • Enhances call schedule • Offers flexibility • Maintain outpatient practice
UT Teleneurology Program Overview Program Goals • Improve overall neurological care in the region • Solidify relationships with existing referral hospitals, increase access to Memorial Hermann System (4-Comprehensive Stroke Centers) • Avoid unnecessary transfers and encourage hospitals to keep patients who do not need a higher level of care in their own community • Educate surrounding hospitals and facilitate the transfer of patients who do need a higher level of care (i.e. Neurosurgery, endovascular or participation in research protocols otherwise not available to patients in the community) • Benefits patient, family and community hospitals
UT Teleneurology Program Overview Program Model • Provide 24/7 acute telestroke coverage • Expanded to acute teleneurology and routine teleneurology (3 spokes) • Hub (4) and Spoke (17) model + 7 Freestanding EDs • Spokes (17): 3 CSCs, 10 PSCs • Mixed Network: 9/17 within Memorial Hermann System, 8/17 outside Memorial Hermann system
Role of Teleneurology • To provide acute neurological consultative services 24/7 (Emergency room or in-hospital) to supplement current neurological coverage • Flexible coverage: 24/7 vs after hours and weekends only etc. • Examples: Potential IV-tPA/IAT candidates, cerebral hemorrhage, status epilepticus, etc • Expedite transfers to CSC hubs if needed with pre-acceptance • To provide routine/non-urgent consultations and follow ups, 7 days a week 8am to 5pm where contracted
How does Teleneurology get Activated? • Acute neurological patient identified • Page UT Teleneurology Team thru call center • Teleneurology protocol activated • TM physician to be on camera if necessary within 10 minutes of page • Evaluate Patient with bedside nurse • Give recommendations • Arrange for transfer if needed
Example Case • 20 year old no sig PMH • Citizens Medical Center • Victoria Texas • Just returned from concert • Found in bathroom @ 9:30PM not acting herself • Last seen normal 9pm • Arrived at OSH ED @ 11pm • Has been having headaches for 1 week • VS: BP: 123/74 HR: 82 RR: 16 NSR • FS: 112
Example Case • NIHSS = 13 • Expressive aphasia, right FD, Right sided hemiparesis and sensory loss • Arrival to ED @ 11:00PM • Paged TM @ 11:19PM • On Cam @ 11:29PM • TPA Bolus @ 11:35PM • Time from page to TPA = 16 minutes
Example Case • Arranged for Transfer to MHH-TMC for possible intra-arterial therapy • Angio showed no proximal occlusion • NIHSS @ 24 hrs = 2 for mild dysarthria and sensory loss • NIHSS @ discharge 1 for sensory changes
Follow up • Negative hypercoaguable work up • TTE + right to left shunt, likely PFO • TEE + interatrial septal aneurysm small fenestrated spontaneous shunting • Lower extdopplers: negative for DVT • MRV Pelvis: no DVT, severe compression of left common iliac vein by right common iliac artery, with increased left sided deep pelvis venous collateralization, may be associated with increase risk of development of DVT • She under went closure of ASD with amplatz device
Example Case • 43 year old no sig PMH • On antibiotics for facial infection • Found @ 7:30PM on the floor of kitchen by daughter “acting strange”, last seen normal at 7pm. • Exam: • Right gaze deviation • Left neglect • Left sided plegia and Left facial droop • Severe dysarthria • NIHSS = 18
Example Case • 43 yr old no sig PMH. On antibiotics for facial infection • Found @ 7:30PM on the floor of kitchen by daughter “acting strange”, last seen normal at 7pm. • Arrived at CSC ED @ 8:21PM via EMS • TM paged @ 8:30PM • TM on cam @ 8:36PM (CTH and CTA completed) • tPA bolus given @ 8:48PM (DTN: 27minutes) • IA Team activated @ 8:43PM • TICI 3 Recanalization @ 10:15PM
Pre Post
Example Case: Outcome and Work up • NIHSS = 0 next day • TEE with PFO/ASA • No DVT; Hypercoagulable labs all unremarkable • PFO closed prior to Discharge home • LOS 5 days
Benefits of Telestroke • Accurate decision making • Increase use of IV t-PA • Reduce unnecessary transfers • Comparable outcomes • Financial benefits • Research opportunities
Assess whether telemedicine consultation is superior to telephonic consultation for acute stroke treatment. • Primary outcome: Decision of thrombolytic treatment • Secondary outcome: sICH, mRS
Conclusion: Telemedicine for acute stroke treatment results in more accurate decisions when compared to telephone consultations.
Benefits of Telestroke • Accurate decision making • Increase use of IV t-PA • Reduce unnecessary transfers • Comparable outcomes • Financial benefits • Research opportunities
Telemedicine: IV t-PA Rates • Thomas Jefferson • Jan 2011-June 2012 • 1643 consults • IV t-PA rate 14% • Increase of IV t-PA use by ~55% • University of Pittsburg • March 2005-December 2008 • 12 hospital spokes • IV t-PA rate 2.8%6.3% • Choi et al. JtComm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Apr;32(4):199-205. • Compared IV t-PA rates in 2 community hospitals in Houston over 13 months • IV t-PA rates increased from 0.8% to 4.3% during telestroke project • TEMPiS project in Bavaria • 12 community hospitals with 2 hubs • IV t-PA volume increased 10x from 10 to 115 over 12 months.
Benefits of Telestroke • Accurate decision making • Increase use of IV t-PA • Reduce unnecessary transfers • Comparable outcomes • Financial benefits • Research opportunities
Reductionin Transfer • Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator Administration in Community Hospitals Facilitated by Telestroke Service • Chalouhi et al., Neurosurgery 2013 • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital developed a 28 spoke telestroke network • Jan 2011-June 2012: 1643 Total consults • 237 IV t-PA (14%), 82% increase in IV t-PA use, • Transfers decreased from 44% in first two quarter 2011 to 19% in the first two quarters of 2012.
Benefits of Telestroke • Accurate decision making • Increase use of IV t-PA • Reduce unnecessary transfers • Comparable outcomes • Financial benefits • Research opportunities
Compared outcomes for Drip and Ship vs Drip and Stay • 9/2015 to 12/2016: Total of 430 tPA-treated • 232 Drip and Ship (NIHSS = 10) • 192 Drip and Stay (NIHSS = 6) • No difference in LOS, hospital mortality, discharge disposition, 90 day mRS
Stroke outcomes worse when presenting overnight or weekends • We compared outcomes and metrics in our TM network • 9/15 to 12/16: Total 424 patients that received tPA • 268 after hours and 156 on-hours • Results: no difference in tPA administration times, complications, and 90 day outcomes • Access to stroke specialist 24/7 via TM can ensure dependable and timely clinical care regardless of time of day or day or week
Benefits of Telestroke • Accurate decision making • Increase use of IV t-PA • Reduce unnecessary transfers • Comparable outcomes • Financial benefits • Research opportunities
Financial Perspective • Hubs: increase in procedures, complex hospital admissions • Spokes: increase in reimbursement for tPA patients that stay at spoke; downstream revenue • Healthcare system: reduction in unnecessary transfers • Patients and Families: reduce unnecessary transfers (driving, parking, accommodations) • TeleStroke Network: Financial stability
Reimbursement Model • Fee-for-service models prevail for metropolitan service areas • Hospitals will pay professional fees for telemedicine coverage • Flat fee per month • “Per Click” • The professional fee model allows for “on the ground” physicians to still bill for services • Telemedicine physician does not bill patient* • Neurologists can focus on their out-patient practice • Alleviates burdensome call
Benefits of Telestroke • Accurate decision making • Increase use of IV t-PA • Reduce unnecessary transfers • Comparable outcomes • Financial benefits • Research opportunities
Telemedicine and Clinical Trials • Clinical trials completion advances in stroke treatment • Recruitment is inefficient • Barriers • Access to tertiary centers • Transfer delays • Time sensitive • Patients in rural areas excluded
Results • Between May 2013 and July 2014, 65 patients screened at the two spokes • 10 identified via TM as eligible • 1 case, insufficient time (<5 mins) for consent • Delay in study team notification • 6 of the remaining 9 (56%) agreed to participate
3 of the 6 patient received t-PA within 60 minutes of arrival • Significant t-PA and US/Sham overlap time • No SAE or major protocol deviation • One minor protocol violation • Comparable to 4 patients enrolled at hub hospital during same period of time
Barriers to Telemedicine • Technology is no longer a barrier to telemedicine • Widely available broadband internet • Reduced cost of equipment • I-Phones, IPADS, Laptops, carts • Facetime/ Skype/ Other video conferencing platforms • Competition • Healthcare market is competitive • For-Profit national providers • Financial Costs • Equipment • Physician coverage • Other resources • Credentialing • Can delay start-up by months • Buy-in by local practitioners • Emergency room physicians and nurses • Hospitalists • Neurologists
Defining the Role and Goals of the Program • Meet with stake-holders to define • Hub hospitals, program managers, physicians, department/division chair • Telestroke or Teleneurology? • Who will provide the consultative services? • UT Stroke Attendings, General Neurologist, fellows? • Community Neurologist?? • Only Emergency room or including medical floors? • Will you provide follow up consultative services? • Facilitate with transfer process? • What network model do we use?
Importance of Training (Spoke) • Pre-launch: Day long training sessions • Mock emergency stroke codes • Mock inpatient stroke codes • Nurses, physicians, techs, unit secretaries • On-going inservicing at spoke sites • IV t-PA time metrics • Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy protocols • Review recognition of stroke signs and symptoms • Educated on large vessel stroke screening tools • Review transfer process