1 / 30

Electromagnetic NDT

Electromagnetic NDT. Veera Sundararaghavan. Research at IIT-madras. Axisymmetric Vector Potential based Finite Element Model for Conventional,Remote field and pulsed eddy current NDT methods. Two dimensional Scalar Potential based Non Linear FEM for Magnetostatic leakage field Problem

brant
Download Presentation

Electromagnetic NDT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electromagnetic NDT Veera Sundararaghavan

  2. Research at IIT-madras • Axisymmetric Vector Potential based Finite Element Model for Conventional,Remote field and pulsed eddy current NDT methods. • Two dimensional Scalar Potential based Non Linear FEM for Magnetostatic leakage field Problem • Study of the effect of continuous wave laser irradiation on pulsed eddy current signal output. • Three dimensional eddy current solver module has been written for the World federation of NDE Centers’ Benchmark problem. The solver can be plugged inside standard FEM preprocessors. • FEM based eddy current (absolute probe) inversion for flat geometries. Inversion process is used to find the conductivity profiles along the depth of the specimen.

  3. Electromagnetic Quantities • E – Electric Field Intensity Volts/m • H – Magnetic Field Intensity Amperes/m • D – Electric Flux density Coulombs/m2 • B – Magnetic Flux density Webers/m2 • J – Current density Amperes/m2 • -Charge density Coulombs/m3 m-Permeability - B/H e-Permittivity - D/E s-Conductivity - J/E

  4. Classical Electromagnetics Maxwell's equations Ñ x H = J + dD / dt Ampere’s law Ñ x E = - dB / dt Faraday’s law Ñ.B = 0 Magnetostatic law Ñ.D = r Gauss’ law Constitutive relations B = mH D = eE J = sE

  5. Interface Conditions • E1t = E2t • D1n-D2n = ri • H1t-H2t = Ji • B1n = B2n 1 2 Boundary conditions • Absorption Boundary Condition - Reflections are eliminated by dissipating energy • Radiation Boundary Condition – Avoids Reflection by radiating energy outwards

  6. Material Properties • Field Dependence: • eg. B = m(H)* H • Temperature Dependence: • Eg. Conductivity Material Classification • Dielectrics • Magnetic Materials - 3 groups • Diamagnetic (m < 1) • Paramagnetic (m >= 1) • Ferromagnetic (m >> 1)

  7. Potential Functions Scalar: If the curl of a vector quantity is zero, the quantity can be represented by the gradient of a scalar potential. Examples: Ñ x E = 0 => E = - ÑV Vector: If the field is solenoidal or divergence free, then the field can be represented by the curl of a vector potential. Examples: Primarily used in time varying field computations Ñ.B = 0 => B = Ñ x A

  8. Derivation of Eddy Current Equation Magnetic Vector Potential : B = ÑxA Ñx E = - dB / dt => Faraday’s Law Ñx E = - Ñx dA / dt => E = - dA / dt - ÑV J = sE => J = - s dA / dt + JS Ampere’s Law: Ñ x H = J + dD / dt Assumption 1: => at low frequencies (f < 5MHz) displacement current (dD / dt) = 0 H = B/m => H = ÑxA/ m Assumption 2 : => Ñ.A = 0 (Continuity criteria) Final Expression: (1/m) Ñ 2(A) = -JS + s(dA /dt)

  9. Electromagnetic NDT Methods • Leakage Fields • (1/m) Ñ 2(A) = -JS • Absolute/Differential Coil EC • & Remote Field EC • (1/m) Ñ 2(A) = -JS + jswA • Pulsed EC • & Pulsed Remote Field EC • (1/m) Ñ 2(A) = -JS + s(dA /dt)

  10. Principles of EC Testing Opposition between the primary (coil) & secondary (eddy current) fields . In the presence of a defect, Resistance decreases and Inductance increases.

  11. Differential Coil Probe in Nuclear steam generator tubes

  12. Pulsed EC

  13. FEM Forward Model (Axisymmetric) Governing Equation: m- Permeability (Tesla-m/A), s- Conductivity (S), A - magnetic potential (Tesla-m), w - the frequency of excitation (Hz), Js – current density (A/m2) Energy Functional: dF(A)/dAi = 0 ------ Final Matrix Equation z rm zm r Triangular element

  14. 5 6 8 7 1 2 4 3 4 3 1 2 FEM Formulation(3D) Governing Equation : (1/m) Ñ 2(A) = -JS + jswA Energy Functional F(A) = ò (0.5niBi2 – JiAi + 0.5jwsAi2)dV, i = 1,2,3 No. of Unknowns at each node : Ax,Ay,Az No. of Unknowns per element : 8 x 3 = 24 Energy minimization dF(A)/dAik = 0,k = x,y,z For a Hex element yields 24 equations, each with 24 unknowns. Final Equation after assembly of element matrices [K][A]= [Q]where [K] is the complex stiffness matrix and [Q] is the source matrix Solid Elements: Magnetic Potential, A = SNiAi

  15. Derivation of the Matrix Equation(transient eddy current) • Interpolation function: A(r,z,t) = [N(r,z)][A(t)]e [S][A] + [C][A’] = [Q] where, [S]e = ò (1/m) [DN]T[DN] dv [C]e = òs [DN]T[DN] dv [Q]e = òJs[DN]Tdv

  16. Time Discretisation • Crank-Nicholson method A’(n+1/2) = ( A(n+1)-A(n) ) / Dt A(1/2) = (A(n+1)+A(n) ) / 2 • substituting in the matrix equation [C] + [S] [A]n+1 = [Q] + [C] - [S] [A]n Dt 2 Dt 2

  17. 2D-MFL (Non-linear) Program Parameter Input Flux leakage Pattern

  18. Flux contours –MFL

  19. Results : Differential Coil Probe

  20. Flux contours Differential Probe Absolute Probe (DiffPack)

  21. Effect of Frequency

  22. Effect of Material Properties Reluctance = 1 Reluctance = 200 Reluctance = 40 Reluctance = 20

  23. Effect of Lift off L = 1 mm L = 2 mm L = 3mm L = 4 mm Increasing lift off

  24. RFEC Results

  25. Effect of Defect shape 1 4 3 2 2 1 3 4

  26. Pulsed Eddy Current : Diffusion Process Input : square pulse (0.5 ms time period) Total time : 2 ms

  27. Results : Transient Equation Input current density v/s time step Gaussian Input Output voltage of the coil

  28. Validation – 3D ECT problem L (3D model) = 2.08796 x 10-4 H L (Axi-symmetric model) = 2.09670 x 10-4 H Error = 0.42 % Axisymmetric mesh (left) and the 3D meshed model(right)

  29. Eddy Current WFNDEC Benchmark Problem

  30. Benchmark Problem

More Related