1 / 31

The Captive Concept Presented by Beverley Todd JLT Insurance Management (Bermuda) Ltd.

AIPAGIA Mid-Winter Conference March 2009. The Captive Concept Presented by Beverley Todd JLT Insurance Management (Bermuda) Ltd. Presentation contents. Introduction – Beverley Todd The captive concept Why form a captive? Types of captives – applicability for AIPAGIA Members?

bozica
Download Presentation

The Captive Concept Presented by Beverley Todd JLT Insurance Management (Bermuda) Ltd.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AIPAGIA Mid-Winter Conference March 2009 The Captive ConceptPresented by Beverley ToddJLT Insurance Management (Bermuda) Ltd.

  2. Presentation contents • Introduction – Beverley Todd • The captive concept • Why form a captive? • Types of captives – applicability for AIPAGIA Members? • Agency Captives – an example • Next Steps?

  3. Introduction Beverley Todd Executive Vice President JLT Insurance Management (Bermuda) Ltd. • Born and bred Londoner! • Accountant by trade – Chartered Institute of Management Accountants • 15 years Bermuda captive management experience

  4. A captive is …… • A special purpose insurance company established to insure or reinsure the risks of its shareholder(s) and their subsidiaries or affiliated companies • A useful risk management and risk financing tool to help a company better handle the financial impact of risk exposures • Usually formed in a specialized environment or “domicile” – “onshore” or “offshore” A captive is not a magical solution to every insurance problem.

  5. Historical development of captives • 1970’s – Property hard market • 1980’s – Liability crisis • 2001 – Market crisis – WTC aftermath • 2008 – Insurer security problems – captive opportunities • Today there are over 4,458 captives worldwide • 1,405 Bermuda • 1,069 Europe • 1,984 Others (includes 24 USA States)

  6. Why form a captive? • To Reduce Costs • To Generate Underwriting Profit & Investment Income • To Optimize Risk Management • To Obtain more Information and Control • To Obtain Additional Capacity • To Obtain Direct Market Access • To Achieve Financial Stability • To Achieve Tax Efficiency

  7. Cost Reduction • Lower overhead costs than a commercial insurer’s, allowing a larger percentage of premium to be used for claims payments • Accessing the reinsurance market, which operates on a lower cost structure than direct insurers • Premiums based upon your own company’s loss experience, not on industry-wide standards • Tax advantages

  8. Underwriting Profit & Investment Income • Retention of underwriting profits and investment income that would otherwise go to the commercial market • Earned investment income on unpaid reserves

  9. Optimize Risk Management • As a separate subsidiary of the business, focuses senior management attention on risk • Ability to design a program to meet specific needs i.e. can include risks which may be currently uninsurable or cost prohibitive • Use captive surplus to fund risk improvements • Ring-fence risk funding • Use contributions to fund loss control projects

  10. Information and Control • Influence program design and cost through progressive retentions • Reliable data for reinsurance purposes • Access to loss data/reserving practice • Claims handling control • Image preservation, • Avoidance of legal precedents, • Out-of-court settlement, • Negative publicity management, • Damage limitation

  11. Additional Capacity • Can act as a direct insurer (where permitted) • Can act as a reinsurer behind a fronting company • Provides insurance coverage throughout fluctuating insurance cycles = price stabilization • As captive matures and realizes increased capital and surplus, it reduces the dependency for obtaining risk transfer through commercial markets • Strategic layer completions e.g. • Left with a gap – unable to complete property layer at lead underwriter premium

  12. Direct Market Access • Allows direct access to reinsurance markets & ART markets • Reinsurance markets are less heavily regulated, wider range of solutions – better program design • Can obtain more competitive wholesale premium quotes than primary insurers • May reduce/eliminate brokerage fees • Collection of reinsurance commissions

  13. Financial Stability • Cost of insurance is cyclical and volatile – a captive insulates owner from withdrawal of capacity by conventional markets: pollution, asbestos, flood, windstorm, terrorism…. • Uses its capacity and reservoir of earnings to stabilize premiums during harder markets – ensures that premiums are determined by company’s own loss experience, not industry-wide standard • Allows access to multi-year ART programs to spread losses across time • Dividend release can be harmonized with parent’s capital needs to reduced debt/equity ratios, tax offset….

  14. Tax Efficiency • Captive premium and loss reserves may be tax deductible expenses • Offshore captives can avoid costly and burdensome regulation by the US insurance and tax authorities in each state. • Small (i.e. under $1.2m of premium written p.a.) non-life insurance companies can elect to be taxed under IRS section 831 (b) – taxed on investment income only

  15. Captive disadvantages • Capital requirement – opportunity cost • Costs – compared to self insurance • High premiums during soft market • Risk of adverse results.

  16. Minimum Capital and Surplus Classification of Insurance Companies - Bermuda Class 1 Pure Captives Class 2 - Group / Association Captives/Agency - Captives writing less than 20% unrelated business Class 3/3A/3B General commercial companies – including SAC/RAC Class 4 Property catastrophe/ excess liability companies

  17. Types of Captive – AIPAGIA Applicability? • The main types of captives are:- • “Pure” or single parent captives • Group Captives • Agency captives • Association captives • Rent-a-captives/Segregated Accounts Companies

  18. “Pure”/Single Parent Captive Structures Insured Insured Insured Insured Captive Insures only the risks of the non-insurance owner or the owner’s subsidiary operations Reinsurer Insurer Insurer Captive Captive Captive Captive Reinsurer Reinsurer

  19. “Pure”/Single Parent Captive Structures • Applicability for AIPAGIA Members? • Fairly limited applicability due to relatively small parental risks presumed within each member agency’s portfolio • Considerations for “pure” captives – Class 1 • Single owner – single insured typically – i.e. direct agency risks • Individual Member agency with 100% ownership – thus total parental control and corresponding total captive risk • Annual premium written typically in excess of $2m • Set-up costs – minimum of $25,000 • Annual running costs of at least $100,000 pa • Minimum capital requirement - $120,000

  20. Group Captives Insured/ Agency 1 Insured/ Agency 2 Insured/ Agency 3 Insured/ Agency 4 Premium Premium Premium Premium Insurer Reinsurer Premium Jointly owned by multiple, non-related organizations to insure the risks of these different entities Insurer Reinsurer Captive Captive

  21. Group Captives • Applicability for AIPAGIA Members? • Possible applicability – i.e. members join to form the Group Captive for their own parental risks • Considerations for Group captives - Class 2 • Established by a group of individual Members rather than AIPIGIA • Shared control amongst participating members • Members obtain shares within the Group captive • Risks are shared among Group owners • Set-up costs (shared) – minimum of $25,000 • Annual (shared) premium written typically in excess of $2m • Annual running costs of at least $120,000 pa • Minimum capital and surplus of $250,000

  22. Agency Captives Owned by an insurance agency or brokerage firm so that they may reinsure a portion of their client risks Insured Insured Agent Agent Insured Captive Reinsurer Insurer Insured

  23. Agency Captives • Applicability for AIPAGIA Members? • Ideal structure for large member agencies • Considerations for agency captives - Class 2 • Individual Member agency with 100% ownership – thus total parental control • Established relationship with Fronting Insurer – although risks can also be written directly (albeit highly unlikely) • Annual premium written typically in excess of $2m • Set-up costs – minimum of $25,000 • Annual running costs of at least $120,000 pa • Minimum capital and surplus of $250,000

  24. Association Captives Owned by a trade, industry or service group for the benefit of its members Insured/ Agency 1 Insured/ Agency 2 Insured/ Agency 3 Insured/ Agency 4 Premium Premium Premium Premium Insurer Insurer Reinsurer Premium Reinsurer Captive

  25. Association Captives • Applicability for AIPAGIA Members? • Ideal structure for allAIPAGIA member agencies • Considerations for association captives - Class 2 • The Captive is established and owned by AIPAGIA rather than individual member agencies • Initial capital and operating funds obtained either via existing Association funds or via Member ‘assessments’ • Participating Members would obtain shares within the Association captive • Risks are shared among AIPAGIA participating members – strict underwriting guidelines required • Annual premium written typically in excess of $2m for entire Association captive – thus individual members annual premium can be fairly small dependant upon the number of active participants • Set-up costs – minimum of $25,000 • Annual running costs of Association captive will be at least $120,000 pa

  26. Rent-a-captives/SAC SAC owner Insured/ Agency 1/Cell 1 A company that provides' captive facilities to others for a fee Insured/ Agency 4/Cell 4 Control Insured/ Agency 3/Cell 3 Core Non-Voting Shares Cell Owner Insured/ Agency 2/Cell 2

  27. Rent-a-captives/Segregated Accounts Co.’s • Applicability for AIPAGIA Members? • AIPAGIA can establish its own RAC/SAC for its Members or alternatively Members can participate in an existing RAC/SAC structure e.g. Isosceles • Considerations for RAC/SAC captives - Class 3 • Non-owned RAC/SAC:- • No start-up costs • Relatively easy entry/exit • Typically no risk sharing among members – accounts are ‘ring fenced’ • Lower annual running costs • Risk ceded must have an aggregate limit – ‘risk gap’ must be fully secured • Annual premium written typically in excess of $500,000 • RAC/SAC sponsor has a ‘voice’ in direction of the insurance program • Owned RAC/SAC:- • AIPAGIA start-up costs will be incurred • AIPAGIA RAC/SAC will be established and maintained purely for the benefit of its members • Other segregated accounts benefits/limitations as per the non-owned RAC/SAC

  28. Agency Captives – an example • Agency Coverages • Group Disability • Group Business Overhead Insurance • Group Life • Parental Coverages • Workers compensation/GL/Auto • General Liability • Errors & Omissions • Captive Participation • Quota share of all Agency coverages – Agency business • Captive premium $2,000,000 p.a. • Errors & Omissions – Parental Business • Captive premium 250,000 p.a.

  29. Agency Captives – an example

  30. Next Steps? • Feasibility Study performed:- • Optimal captive structure – based upon current Membership • Review of members historical loss history • Cost/benefit analysis – financial projections • Taxation issues • Domicile choices • Insurance Manager Selection – coordinates - entire incorporation process – including assistance with business plan preparation, liaison with corporate lawyers and final submission to the relevant regulatory authority • Congratulations - commence captive operations!!!!

  31. Questions? THANK-YOU! QUESTIONS?

More Related