RRM MIB Variable Structures
130 likes | 161 Views
RRM MIB Variable Structures. Byoung-Jo "J" Kim AT&T Labs-Research. Easy things First. In the order of difficulty of Standardizing Passively Observed Parameters during normal operation CCA, RSSI, Noise Power, Frame Counts, States, MAC addresses, Beacons, etc. Trending them?
RRM MIB Variable Structures
E N D
Presentation Transcript
RRM MIB Variable Structures Byoung-Jo "J" Kim AT&T Labs-Research Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research
Easy things First • In the order of difficulty of Standardizing • Passively Observed Parameters during normal operation • CCA, RSSI, Noise Power, Frame Counts, States, MAC addresses, Beacons, etc. • Trending them? • Transfer of Parameters between STA to AP: 11h-like.. • SNMP to STA over Radio is not desired nor workable • Need Request/Response over Air • Can be used for Actively Measured Parameters • Actively Measured Parameters • May need a way to Quiet the medium • Control • AP Requesting Change of Config/Behavior of its STAs • External Entity communication via SNMP or modified IAPP? Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research
Step-by-Step Standardization? • First, Define and Add “Passively Observable” Parameters to 802.11 MIB • Standard Impact Minimal • Non-AP STAs may start recording upon request from AP • This Presentation is limited to this • While the above is being balloted • Transfer of Parameters between STA to AP • Actively Measured Parameters: extend TGh? • May Need some architectural thinking • While the above is being balloted • Work on Control Issues: Maybe a next TG • Definitely Need some architectural thinking Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research
Distinguish AP and non-AP STA in MIB? • Some parameters make sense only for APs • Some parameters make sense only for non-AP STAs • SNMP to STAs not desirable nor feasible • Current MIB does not have anything specific for AP • but all APs are STAs • RRM should distinguish them “Explicitly”? • Any implications to other part of 802.11? • RRM should distinguish them “Implicitly”? • Potentially Confusing, but fits the current 802.11 MIB Architecture mostly (11f added some AP specifics) • “This Presentation takes this approach” Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research
Passively Observed Parametersinto 802.11 MIB • Current 802.11 MIB has the following sub-branches • dot11smt, dot11mac, dot11res, dot11phy, dot11Conformance • Current 802.11 MIB has some Per-Interface Stats: dot11CountersTable) under dot11mac: • Extend/Replace with dot11macStatsTable for per Interface stats beyond the current MAC counters? • Extend doc11phy/dot11phyDSSSTable and dot11phyOFDMTable for PHY stats? • New Per-STA table is needed: dot11STAStatsTable under dot11mac & dot11phy? • One Private MIB had this under “Forwarding Table”, containing corresponding MAC addresses : Reasonable place but out of 802.11 scope? • Another Private MIB has this under “Association Table”, which excludes STA observed but not associated, or other APs • Need to include all known STAs, APs, regardless of association Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research
Before & AfterJust Examples... • Current 802.11 MIB has the following sub-branches Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research
Current 802.11 MIB has some Per-Interface Stats under dot11mac Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research
Important Suggestion! • During this Presentation • Let’s NOT Focus on Particular Variables • I’m not proposing any particular variables, just place holders • Let’s Focus on Overall Structure Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research
Update the CounterTable with macStatsTable like this? Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research
Augment like this? • Original PhyDSSSTable Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research
Augment with more types? • Original Notifications Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research
per-STA table added like this? Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research
How to move info between STA to AP? • Proprietary Methods Observed in Current Products for a few parameters • Simple IP level proprietary protocol • Proprietary extension of Management Frames • Need Info from hardware implementers • Naturally leads to Active Measurements • 11h does this for some parameters • Reported parameters from other STAs should go under dot11smt, indexed via integer containing reporters’ address and observed addresss Byoung-Jo "J" Kim, AT&T Labs-Research