1 / 6

Work Plan for IEEE 802.16m Standard & IMT-Advanced Submission

IEEE 802.16m-09/0019. 2009-05-19. Work Plan for IEEE 802.16m Standard & IMT-Advanced Submission. Documents to be Developed in TGm. TGm will develop the following documents as part of 802.16m standardization process: System Requirements Document (SRD)

blaise
Download Presentation

Work Plan for IEEE 802.16m Standard & IMT-Advanced Submission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IEEE 802.16m-09/0019 2009-05-19 Work Plan for IEEE 802.16m Standard & IMT-Advanced Submission

  2. Documents to be Developed in TGm • TGm will develop the following documents as part of 802.16m standardization process: • System Requirements Document (SRD) • A set of possible deployment scenarios and applications of the 802.16m standard. • A set of performance targets and features that 802.16m compliantsystems shall meet or exceed. • Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) • A complete set of parameters, models, and methodologies for the link-level and system-level simulations that allow fair evaluation/comparison of various technical proposals. • Channels Models: A set of spatial channel model parameters are specified to characterize particular features of MIMO radio channels to be used for simulating technical proposals for the future 802.16m standard. • System Description Document (SDD) • Architecture and design of the 802.16m air interface amendment • Captures the core technical concepts behind the features included in the amendment • Will enable analysis and/or simulations for characterizing the coarse level performance benefits of the air interface in association with the Evaluation Methodology Document • 802.16m amendment • 802.16 IMT-Advanced Proposal

  3. Feb Oct Proposal Submission Sep Circular Letter Aug Proposal Evaluation & Consensus Building Develop Recommendation Q1 Dec Nov Mar Jan Sep Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Nov IMT.EVAL IMT.TECH Dec Jul Aug Feb Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan May Mar Apr Apr Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Jun Jan Apr Q1 TGm Timelines May May IMT Advanced Proposal Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Jul Mar May Apr Jun Jun Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Q1 Jun May Apr Mar Jul Feb Jul May Aug Oct Jun Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jun Aug Sep Oct Nov Jul May Feb Apr Dec Apr Jul Q2 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q3 Q3 Q4 Q4 Q4 System Description System Requirements Evaluation Methodology 802.16m Amendment Working Doc Letter Ballot Refinements Sponsor Ballot IMT.RSPEC ITU-R IMT Advanced IEEE 802.16m Final Proposal 2007 2010 2008 2009 Q2 Q3 Q4 IEEE 802.16 Sep ’07* Amendment Ready for IMT-Adv evaluation Jan’08* Amendment Feature Complete. EC Conditional Approval for SB. EC Conditional Approval for RevCom submission Nov ’07 Jan 09* Amendment Ready for Industry Release. RevCom submission ITU based Updates Jan ’09 Sept ’09* Nov ’08 July ’09 Jan’10 May ’10 Jun ’08 Jun ’08 ITU based potential updates Oct ’08 Jan’09 Oct ’09 Jun ’10 ITU-R WP5D 3 3 *System Requirements and Evaluation Methodology, System Description, IMT-Advanced Proposal Documents may be further updated based on ITU output (shown by dotted lines).

  4. Process for staging 802.16m Amendment feature development Feature 1 Feature 2 Feature N Feature N+1 PHY/MAC features required for IMT-Advanced for a working system P802.16m draft AWD SB WG LB Feature inclusion vote 75% 50% Final feature addition meeting 50% Amendment Feature development: -Feature developed as a RG contribution to TGm -Finally included only as a complete proposal, not a partial one -Develop as a self contained clause/subclause unless it is essential -Do not put place holders in Amendment till the feature is ready. (SDD will still have all features) -RGs should track Amendment development for consistency -WG LB recirculation scope should allow feature addition -All features have to go thru at least one WG LB recirculation RG RG RG Next Project (New PAR) RG AWD = Amendment Working Doc RG = Rapporteur Group LB = Letter Ballot SB= Sponsor Ballot

  5. Feature RG process for the Amendment • Feature Rapporteur Groups (RG) will develop contributions for adoption by TGm as per Process (in previous slide) • RGs will be authorized/re-authorized at each TGm session • TGm will provide final deadlines for completion of RG work. • RG must start with a work plan based on TGm final deadlines. • RGs must report progress at every TGm session • RG final output contribution must be complete by TGm deadlines for adoption into the AWD/Draft • RGs may meet during TGm sessions • RGs can arrange teleconferences with 7 day advance notice • RGs conduct straw polls for decision making • RGs are open to all participants

  6. Amendment Feature RG timelines 6

More Related