170 likes | 469 Views
Background. Arsenic most soluble with Eh<100 mVRelease of arsenic to anoxic groundwaters frequently reported:Bangladesh, West Bengal India, Taiwan. After Masscheleyn et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1991.Activities of As, Mn, Fe ~10-4. Winthrop, Maine, USA. Closed, unlined landfill sited in glacial till and outwashLeachate has shifted groundwater chemistry more reducing (ORP -105 mV)Sediments contain ~7 mg/kg AsSediment reducing GW = ~300 mg/L AsGroundwater extraction and33001
E N D
1. Can redox manipulations remove dissolved arsenic from groundwater? Alison R. Keimowitz1,2, Pamela Cole2,3, Brian J. Mailloux2, Martin Stute2,3, H. James Simpson1,2, Steven N. Chillrud2, Yan Zheng2,4
2. Background Arsenic most soluble with Eh<100 mV
Release of arsenic to anoxic groundwaters frequently reported:
Bangladesh, West Bengal India, Taiwan
3. Winthrop, Maine, USA Closed, unlined landfill sited in glacial till and outwash
Leachate has shifted groundwater chemistry more reducing (ORP -105 mV)
Sediments contain ~7 mg/kg As
Sediment + reducing GW = ~300 mg/L As
Groundwater extraction and treatment system ineffective
Other landfills show similar processes
4. If redox is the problem, can redox be the solution?
5. ORC® Pilot Experiment ORC– Oxygen Release Compound
Contains magnesium peroxide, phosphate and minor components
Designed to release O2 over ~6 months
1400 kg ORC injected through aquifer thickness
6. ORC® Pilot Experiment
7. ORC® Pilot Experiment– Results
8. ORC® Pilot Experiment– Results
9. ORC® Pilot Experiment 1400 kg ORC released ~330 kg O2
But what is the subsurface oxygen demand?
10. Arsenic Removal via Sulfide Precipitation?
11. Proof of Principle Previous studies have demonstrated removal of arsenic by SRB
Sulfate is high at Winthrop due to GWETS
Preliminary studies indicate that native microbial communities at Winthrop are carbon-limited
12. Experimental Setup Incubate sediment + acetate + artificial GW for ~7 weeks in reaction vessel and microcosms
Microcosms permit sediment sampling, replicate samples
Reaction vessel permits electrode monitoring, sampling from 1 reservoir
Monitor changes in water and sediment
13. Results– Acetate Respiration, Sulfate Reduction
14. Results– Metals
15. Results– pH, ORP
16. Explanation of Data?
17. Ongoing Research Characterization of sediment
Sequential extractions
XANES/EXAFS
XRD?
Characterization of microbial processes
Phospholipid fatty acids
DNA
18. Conclusions Remediation by oxidation
Opposes natural redox buffering of sediment
Remediation by further reduction
Requires C addition
pH changes reduce effectiveness (?)
Both difficult due to complex hydrogeological flowpaths
More research is warranted– in situ remediation may prove very difficult