1 / 26

Deriving galaxy ages and metallicities using 6dF

Deriving galaxy ages and metallicities using 6dF. 6dFGS Workshop April 2005 Rob Proctor (Swinburne University of Technology) Collaborators: Philip Lah (ANU) Duncan Forbes (Swinburne University of Technology) Warrick Couch (UNSW) Matthew Colless (AAO). Aim and Outline. Aim:

birch
Download Presentation

Deriving galaxy ages and metallicities using 6dF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Deriving galaxy ages and metallicities using 6dF 6dFGS Workshop April 2005 Rob Proctor (Swinburne University of Technology) Collaborators: Philip Lah (ANU) Duncan Forbes (Swinburne University of Technology) Warrick Couch (UNSW) Matthew Colless (AAO)

  2. Aim and Outline • Aim: • To test theories of galaxy formation using galactic-archeology. • Outline: • The challenges. • Our approach to them using 6dFGS data. • Some preliminary results. • The future. • Some conclusions

  3. The challenges • The age-metallicity degeneracy: • Young, metal-rich populations strongly resemble old, metal-poor populations. [Fe/H]=-0.4 1.5 Gyr 1.0 Gyr 15 Gyr 7 Gyr Age=6 Gyr , [Fe/H]=0.2 Age=12Gyr, [Fe/H]=0.0 2.0 Gyr [Fe/H]=-2.25 Models: Bruzual & Charlot (2003) Models: Sanchez-Blazquez (Ph.D. thesis); Vazdekis et al. 2005 (in prep)

  4. The challenges • Abundance-ratio variations (e.g. [Mg/Fe] †) †[X/Y]=log(NX/NY)*-log(NX/NY) • A new opportunity? • ‘’-element abundance ratios in stellar populations are indicators of the time-scale of star formation.

  5. Lick indices (Worthey 1994) 25 spectral features with a variety of sensitivities to age, overall metallicity ([Z/H]) and ‘’-element abundance ratio ([Mg/Fe]). Models of Thomas, Maraston & Korn (2004) used here. Model simple stellar populations (SSPs) with ages up to 15 Gyr and [Z/H] from -2.25 to +0.4 dex. ‘’-element abundance ratios of from -0.3 to +0.5 dex modelled using the spectral synthesis of Tripicco & Bell (1995)

  6. Breaking the degeneracy with Lick indices. • Differences in sensitivities leads to the breaking of the age/metallicity degeneracy. N=1200 Age =1 Gyr Z=-2.25 • Data require extrapolation of models in metallicity • A population apparently older than 15 Gyr. • Observational error. • Modelling uncertainties. • Horizontal-branch morphology? Z=0.5 Age=15 Gyr

  7. Our approach. • Use Lick indices to estimate luminosity-weighted age, [Fe/H], [/Fe] and [Z/H] for ~5000 6dFGS DR1 galaxies(Already ~50x larger than any previous study of its kind). • Employ as many indices as possible (up to 25) in the derivation of galaxy properties using a 2-fitting procedure (Proctor & Sansom 2002; Proctor et al. 2004a,b). • This: • Minimises effects of most reduction and calibration errors (sky-subtraction, flux calibration, stray cosmic rays, poor calibration to Lick system etc). • Minimises effects of modelling errors. • Utilises the fact that ALL indices contain SOME information about age, [Fe/H], [/Fe] and [Z/H] (Proctor et al. 2005). • Provides some of the most reliable age and metallicity estimates from integrated spectra to-date (I.e. work to low S/N).

  8. Results from 6dFGS spectra: Emission • Use emission to isolate a sample dominated by early-type galaxies. • From ~35,000 DR1 galaxies with index measurements we find: • 9000 with S/N>15 • 5000 emission free • 2000 with HII region emission • 2000 with AGN emission • 3000 with S/N>22 • 1800 emission free • 600 with HII region emission • 600 with AGN emission Ref……….. HII regions AGN H, OII and NII emission strengths supplied by Philip Lah.

  9. 6dFGS: Age with velocity dispersion • Both AGN and HII region galaxies lower velocity dispersion (mass) than the emission free. • Emission line galaxies dominate at low velocity dispersion. • Consistent with the notion that we are excluding late-type galaxies. N=7500

  10. 6dFGS: Age with velocity dispersion N=3000 • Suggests a mass-age correlation in opposite sense to hierarchical collapse models of Kauffmann (1996). • i.e. Highest mass galaxies tend to be old. • Range of ages inconsistent with models of primordial collapse. • BUT………..

  11. 6dFGS: Age with velocity dispersion N=3000 NGC 821 • “Frosting” • A busrt of SF of only a few % of galaxy mass can easily provide the majority of the sampled luminosity. e.g. NGC 821: Proctor et al. 2005

  12. 6dFGS: Age with velocity dispersion MB=-19 MB=-21 • Lines of constant luminosity estimated using FJ-relation and [M/L] models of BC03. • Sampling effects probably cause apparent age-mass relation. • Recall sample is essentially luminosity limited.. • Can infer Forbes & Ponman (1999) finding that young galaxies tend to have high luminosity for their velocity dispersion N=2500

  13. The Faber-Jackson Relation Red: Young • Confirms Forbes & Ponman (1999) finding that residuals to the FJ-relation correlate with galaxy age. • Suggests age/metallicity degeneracy has been broken. N=1500

  14. The Colour-Magnitude Relation (CMR)(The ‘red-sequence’) • Normally assumed to indicate a mass/metallicity relation and to imply a small range of ages. • Data suggest true picture not so clear-cut • However, the sample is limited to high luminosity galaxies. • (photometric bimodality becomes significant R>-17) • Nevertheless, argues against common belief that low scatter in CMR implies old ages. (At least in high luminosity galaxies)

  15. 6dFGS: Results for [Z/H] Red: Low mass Red: Young An age-metallicity relation A mass-metallicity relation [Z/H]=0.7log()-0.6log(age)-1.0 (a mass-metallicity relation that evolves with time)

  16. 6dFGS: -element abundance ratios. Red: Young Red: Low mass Pure Fe N=3500 Pure Fe Suggests less continuous SF than solar neighbourhood An [/Fe]-age relation

  17. The future. • Refine age/metallicity measurements (This is a work in progress). • Probe ages and metallicities in emission line galaxies (Consider ages<1.0 Gyr). • Investigate emission line characteristics (HII/AGN, Balmer decrements, gas metallicities). • Quantify trends in galaxy parameters (FJ-relation, CMR and age/mass/metallicity planes). • Test idea of ‘frosting’ (Compare spectroscopic results for central regions to global photometry). • Investigate variations with environment. • DR2 and DR3.

  18. Conclusions. • We have used Lick indices to break the age-metallicity degeneracy in by far the largest study of its kind to-date. • Results show trends in ALL metallicity parameters with both mass AND age. • These provide challenges to both primordial and monolithic collapse models of galaxy formation. • The 6dFGS will prove to be an invaluable testing ground for galaxy formation models. • The addition of reliable age and metallicity estimates for a large number of galaxies will significantly enhance the value of the 6dFGS.

  19. Abrat issues 1 - ?

  20. Lick indices (Worthey 1994) • Integration of stellar properties (weighted by IMF) along isochrones of given age and metallicity yields model properties for an SSP. • Spectral synthesis of Tripicco & Bell (1995) models ‘’-elements(Models used here : Thomas, Maraston & Korn 2004) Properties of single stellar populations (SSPs) are estimated using: Stellar spectral libraries (Teff, log g and [Fe/H]). Isochrones (age and [Fe/H]). A Stellar Initial Mass Function(IMF: No. with mass).

  21. Age-metallicity degeneracy1. Photometry [Fe/H]=-0.4 15 Gyr 7 Gyr 1.0 Gyr [Fe/H]=-2.25 2.0 Gyr 1.5 Gyr - Tight locus of all combinations of age and metallicity in the range 2.0 -15 Gyr, -2.25≤[Fe/H]≤-0.4(Models: Bruzual & Charlot 2003)

  22. 6dFGS: [Fe/H] results

  23. Our approach. • Estimate Age, [Fe/H], [/Fe] and [Z/H] • Use as many indices as possible (up to 25) • Thus: • Minimise effects of most errors (reduction and calibration) • Utilise the fact that ALL indices contain SOME information about age, [Fe/H] and [E/Fe].

More Related