1 / 6

Comparing Tropospheric Ozone in 2000 and 2011.

Comparing Tropospheric Ozone in 2000 and 2011. By: Aaron Jennison. Data. The data was taken from: www.georgiaair.org/amp/amp_query.html Data collected by ultraviolet photometry. Collected between March 1 to October 31. The measurements were taken in Gwinnett. Data. Data.

bethany-cervantes
Download Presentation

Comparing Tropospheric Ozone in 2000 and 2011.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparing Tropospheric Ozone in 2000 and 2011. By: Aaron Jennison

  2. Data • The data was taken from: www.georgiaair.org/amp/amp_query.html • Data collected by ultraviolet photometry. • Collected between March 1 to October 31. • The measurements were taken in Gwinnett.

  3. Data

  4. Data

  5. Reason for Difference • The collected data for 2011 had many hours where there wasn’t a measurement. • Clouds and rain affected collection of data. • It rained much less in 2000 than in 2011. • In 2000 it rained 21.77 inches and in 2011 it rained 25.43 inches in between March and October.

  6. Sources of Ozone • Industrial activity and burning of fossil fuels. • Trees, which produce isoprene. • Population growth in Gwinnett has risen from 588,448 in 2000 to 805,321 in 2010. • Yet 2011 had less hazardous days. • So trees may be contributing more to tropospheric ozone than (assumed) more pollution.

More Related