1 / 27

Indonesia is the center of marine biodiversity

Comparison of dispersal in two sea stars, Linckia laevigata and Protoreaster nodosus , across a known geographic barrier. Martha Muñoz, Bola Akinronbi, and Paul Barber (BUMP). Indonesia is the center of marine biodiversity. Fish Corals Snails. Coastal margins during glacial maxima.

Download Presentation

Indonesia is the center of marine biodiversity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparison of dispersal in two sea stars, Linckia laevigata and Protoreaster nodosus, across a known geographic barrier. Martha Muñoz, Bola Akinronbi, and Paul Barber (BUMP)

  2. Indonesia is the center of marine biodiversity Fish Corals Snails

  3. Coastal margins during glacial maxima Pleistocene Sea Level Fluctuations After Voris 2002 400km

  4. Duke et al. 1999 Lavery et al. 1996 Williams & Benzie, Benzie & Williams 1997 McMillan & Palumbi 1996

  5. Linkia laevigata

  6. Williams et al. (2000).

  7. GOALS • To examine the genetic structure of Linckia laevigata across a broad geographic scale and refine the location of a biogeographic break. • To determine the degree of similarity genetic structure between Linckia laevigata and Protoreaster nodosus, which have similar larval pelagic dispersals.

  8. Protoreaster nodosus

  9. F-statistics • Fst: measure of genetic divergence by examining allelic content. • Ranges from 0-1. • “0” means there is no genetic difference between sub- and total population. • “1” means the sub- and total population are not related at all. • It is used to infer gene flow.

  10. Methods I. Sampling Sulawesi Java Papua Halmahera

  11. Methods I. Sampling in the field- Collected 377 Linckia and 115 Protoreaster from 23 localities. II. DNA extractions were performed using a 10% Chelex solution and samples were incubated overnight. III. Amplifications of mitochondrial CO-1 were performed and fragments varying from 658 to 890 base pairs were isolated.

  12. Methods IV. Isolated CO-1 fragments were sequenced on an ABI 377 using ddNTP terminator chemistry V.Resulting fragments were proofread using Sequencher software and fragment alignments were visually made. VI. Minimum-spanning trees and F-statistics were determined using Arlequin software.

  13. Linckia laevigata Minimum Spanning Tree Black Clade White Clade Gray Clade Clades were separated by 8 mutational steps.

  14. Results Linckia laevigata Relative Clade Distribution

  15. Protoreaster Haplotype Network White Clade Black Clade Gray Clade

  16. Protoreaster

  17. Linckia Protoreaster

  18. West East

  19. Fst and Genetic Variance Between Indian and Pacific Ocean Populations of Linckia

  20. Fst and Genetic Variance Between Indian and Pacific Ocean Populations of Protoreaster

  21. Fst of Linkia vs. Protoreaster

  22. Conclusions High diversity in haplotypes with some regional differentiation of clades. Protoreaster Linckia

  23. Conclusions Three major clades among Linckia and Protoreaster. Star phylogenies suggest recent range expansions. Protoreaster Linckia

  24. Conclusions Variation across a geographic gradient is positively orrelated between Protoreaster and Linckia. These similar taxa disperse and exchange genes in similar patterns.

  25. Broader Implications Similar taxa, such as Linckia and Protoreaster can display similar patterns of dispersal. Marine protected areas require ranges large enough to ensure adequate gene flow.

  26. Acknowledgments Thank you to Paul Barber, Bolanle Akinronbi, Elizabeth Jones, and Eric Crandall for support both in the laboratory and in the field. NSF for funding

More Related